Title: RE: [PEN-L:27739] Re: Re: Imperialism in decline?
Ulhas:9. Foreign policy issues are not important domestic politics. Why should they be important? We are free and independent nation. Marxists, particularly of anti-imperialist variety, don't appreciate that calling independent nations
Title: RE: [PEN-L:27741] RE: Re: Re: Imperialism in decline?
Ulhas:9. Foreign policy issues are not important domestic politics. Why should they be important? We are free and independent nation. Marxists, particularly of anti-imperialist variety, don't appreciate that calling independent
How does this comport with Vandana Shiva's dire tales of Indian
farmers miserably exploited by international agribusiness and the
gene modifiers?
Doug
Ulhas was writing about rich farmers, not the poor majority. Why he did is
anybody's guess. It is like asking somebody about the situation of
Doug Henwood :
How does this comport with Vandana Shiva's dire tales of Indian
farmers miserably exploited by international agribusiness and the
gene modifiers?
The question Doug asked was about the WTO and its impact on Indian farmers.
So I answered accordingly. Poor farmers hardly have any
Ulhas:
The question Doug asked was about the WTO and its impact on Indian farmers.
So I answered accordingly. Poor farmers hardly have any surpluses to be
affected by the WTO. Doug's question was not about the state of poor and
marginal farmers.
Subject: Massive mobilisation in India against the
New Delhi, Jan 11, 2000
While more than 200 activists were staging a demonstration outside,
three protestors sneaked into a heavily guarded venue session of the
Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) Partnership Meet 2000, here
today. WTO Director General Mike Moore had just finished speaking
Ulhas Joglekar wrote:
Is Lenin's theory of imperialism relevant today?
The minute Japan and the EU begin an arms buildup and fight with the
U.S. for influence in the so-called South, and U.S., EU, and Japanese
capitalists withdraw their investments in each other - maybe.
Doug
Doug Henwood wrote:
Ulhas Joglekar wrote:
Is Lenin's theory of imperialism relevant today?
The minute Japan and the EU begin an arms buildup and fight with the
U.S. for influence in the so-called South, and U.S., EU, and Japanese
capitalists withdraw their investments in each other -
Title: RE: [PEN-L:27654] Re: Re: Re: Re: Imperialism in decline?
Ulhas: And what is Imperialism in the first place?
Imperialism, as Marxists use that term, refers to a social system of international domination, of most countries by others. (Unlike in other perspectives, it is not simply
Devine, James:
Ulhas:And what is Imperialism in the first place?
Imperialism, as Marxists use that term, refers to a social system of
international domination, of most countries by others. (Unlike in other
perspectives, it is not simply a policy, a decision by government
officials.) Originally
The problem is that whatever their faults may be (and I personally thinktheir work is pretty worthless), it is bizarre to accuse Hardt/Negri oflacking a dialectical approach. It might be better to say that theirerror is dialectics run wild, escaped from all grounding in empiricalreality.
thanks,
From: Nancybrumback:
thanks, carrol, for your response. however, the question was what is a
dialectical approach in the first place?
And what is Imperialism in the first place?
Ulhas
12 matches
Mail list logo
