Nonsense, occasional vindictive silliness never hurt anything. I spent
a great of deal of time on another list having to explain why I did
not want Clinton impeached by the right wing. An occassional reminder
that he is one of the bad guys, that we are defending him on civil
liberties grounds, as
Quoth Gar Lipow:
Jim Hurd on another lists proposed he accept voluntary chemical
castration as the price of staying in office... I suggested the
surgical kind would probably be more acceptable to Clinton, as he is
used to trading his balls for political power.
James Devine wrote:
from
Jim Hurd on another lists proposed he accept voluntary chemical
castration as the price of staying in office... I suggested the
surgical kind would probably be more acceptable to Clinton, as he is
used to trading his balls for political power.
James Devine wrote:
from SLATE: Forget censure.
from SLATE: Forget censure. Forget impeachment. How about putting the Big
Creep to work clearing roadside trash or dishing out soup kitchen grub?
David Plotz proposes a community-service sentence for Clinton.
Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://clawww.lmu.edu/Departments/ECON/jdevine.html
Jim Devine wrote,
Tom, I think this is much too simple. The US wanted to defend its empire
against any kind of nationalist revolt, especially those which were
left-leaning in any way. The invasion of the Dominican Republic in 1965 had
nothing to do with demographics. The US leaders thought that
Frank Durgin ponders, in part:
.
Net farm income in 1993 was $43.6 billion. The US Department of
Agriculture's budget that year was $63 Billion.
[I]f in addition to the $63 billion
spent by the Federal Department
Does anyone know if there is a source that gives US combined state
spending. What I have in mind here is if in addition to the $63 billion
spent by the Federal Department of Agriculture one added total state
spending governments it would all come to a pretty lofty sum. I would like
to be able to
Folloiwng are what I consider some very significant US Farm Statistics
Total number of farms in US in 1992: 1,925,000
The largest 16,000 (0.8% of all US farms) accounted for 33% of all farm
sales.
The largest 47,000 (2.4 % of all US farms) accounted for 45.9% of all farm
sales.
The largest
"What did you do during the war, daddy?"
"I went to graduate school, my son."
There are two ways to look at the 1A selective service classification. You
could view 1A as the point of the whole exercise and you'd be wrong. Or you
could view 1A as an admission of failure to comply with the
Confirmation of reading: your message -
Date:25 Sep 98 18:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEN-L:239] Re: Disgruntled
Was read at 12:35, 25 Sep 98.
BY HEATHER CHAPLIN
The very real problems of the modern-day workplace -- stagnant salaries,
long hours, economic disparity, demoralizing conditions, eroding civil
liberties -- have been trivialized in the incredibly unfunny world of
"Dilbert" and essentially ignored by the business pages.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--9899F104A2815202FC5F2D0F
Albert V. Krebs wrote:
The
AGRIBUSINESS
EXAMINER Issue #4 September 24, 1998
Montioring Corporate Agribusiness From A Public Interest Perspective
A.V. Krebs
Utterly disgraceful, isn't it!! Imagine---people actually having a stronger
sense of community and humanity and devotion to family than of avarice,
narrow self-interest, and the capitalist work ethos.
My vision of socialism is a system where all work is valued but family and
community come
"and it's one, two, three, what are we fightin' for?
don't know and ah don't give a damn, next stop is viet nam"
what good is poetics?
Back in Davis in 1966 I took a course called Rhetoric. Thought it would be
something like public speaking. The national debate topic that year was
something
Tribes seek to restore spirit by restoring buffalo
_
BY JODI RAVE Lincoln Journal Star
CROW AGENCY, Mont. Leroy Stewart grew up in the Big Horn Mountains,
always with his grandfather, always close to the land.
BY HEATHER CHAPLIN
I met Daniel Levine when I was working at my first real post-college job. I
was an editorial assistant at a Bay Area business paper, and while I have
since learned to kiss the very ground that working environment was built
on, at the time I was shocked and appalled by the
At 23:00 24/09/98 -0700, you wrote:
michael perelman wrote,
A couple of days ago NPR had a story about Native Americans being poor
employees because their family obligations are too strong. They are too
prone to take time off to help a friend or family member in need.
Yup. Key lines of
Regrading Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: (etc.)
Max's note on the political implication of relative incomes are important.
Missing from our chat, though, are the kinds of real vulnerabilites (and on
the upside, potentials) that accompany (or not!) various levels of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/24/98 3:03:39 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
everyone else gets a smidgen richer, then, yes, most people
would feel poorer. Even Adam Smith agreed.
but it isn't 'everyone' else. it's only 1 out of 10 or is it
Friends,
I agree completely with Tom. I have been working for 30 years and the
employer expects more work now than when I began. I get so pissed off
at all of the deals being made, the hypocrisy, the lack of respect for
good work that i literally drive myself crazy, into such a depressed
state
michael perelman wrote,
A couple of days ago NPR had a story about Native Americans being poor
employees because their family obligations are too strong. They are too
prone to take time off to help a friend or family member in need.
Yesterday, I went to a memorial service for a good friend
21 matches
Mail list logo
