[PEN-L] On Windows of Opportunity

2006-12-02 Thread Angelus Novus
--- Yoshie Furuhashi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 A social
 movement, especially
 one with an ambition to present an alternative to
 capitalist
 modernity, needs a world view, a world view that
 inspires people to
 have faith in the work they must do in the face of
 adversity.

I'm skeptical as to whether a better worldview is
sufficient as a catalyst for mobilization.  I think
you were closer to reality that once you have a fully
functioning commodity-producing society, with almost
all social relationships subjugated to the value form
and wage relationship, mobilizing people in a way that
isn't system-immanent is nearly impossible.

The classical workers movment was a movement by the
proletariat *for* it's full, democratic integration
into the sytem of wage-labor and parliamentary
democracy.  The American civil rights movement was a
movement by black folk excluded from all that for the
same thing.  And the recent latino mobilizations, I
would think, are in many ways the same.

Which is not to say that such mobilizations shouldn't
be supported.  As I stated on lbo-talk, full support
for open borders is the *minimal* demand for any
communist today.  This to me is a non-negotiable
position.  Anyone arguing for some sort of
social-democratic welfare state measures to cushion
the blow of neo-liberalism for workers in the advanced
countries, but not supporting open borders, is
defending racial privilege and welfare chauvinism of
the advanced countries.

Maybe every such movement for full democratic and
civil rights has a *potentially* revolutionary
dynamic, but with a time limit set, a closing window
of opportunity.  Latino workers fighting for access to
the United States job market, and full
bourgeois-democratic rights within the American
political system, have a *potentially* revolutionary
dynamic by throwing down the gauntlet to the privilege
of native American workers.

But the window of opportunity shrinks.  And if the
balance of forces changes sufficiently so that Latino
immigrants are able to achieve their demands eithout
effecting a revolutionary dynamic, then we are back to
square one.  Once people have mortages and Nintendo
Wii, that window of opportunity closes.

A quick glimpse at the technology discussion forums at
www.digg.com gives a nice picture of the state of mind
of workers in the advanced countries.  When Macintosh
is so lame you stupid faggot loser is the level of
discourse of the educated skilled-worker elite, I
don't see how any worldview, no matter how good, has
any mobilization potential.







Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com


Re: [PEN-L] On Windows of Opportunity

2006-12-02 Thread Leigh Meyers

Angelus Novus wrote:


A quick glimpse at the technology discussion forums at
www.digg.com gives a nice picture of the state of mind
of workers in the advanced countries.  When Macintosh
is so lame you stupid faggot loser is the level of
discourse of the educated skilled-worker elite, I
don't see how any worldview, no matter how good, has
any mobilization potential.


.
A few years ago, as reported by the SF Chronicle, I believe, a group of
Netscape engineers were perusing some code in Internet Explorer
(probably looking for the 'hook' into Windows OS), and not only
discovered a backdoor in the IE's security, but also found some uinique
'padding code'... a section of code in software that doesn't really do
anything, it's just required because the 'module' (can't recall the
correct term) *needs* to be a certain number of bytes long.

The padding code was text, and it said: Netscape engineers are weenies

The developer that inserted that code, if my memory of general industry
wages at the time serves, was probably earning somewhere from $50,000 -
$70,000 a year to phuck around in his cubie. A MicroSoft developer could
be more highly remunerated for their services... and for the most part,
all of the above are specifically educated, over-the-age-of-majority...
children.

That's why unions had practically no luck organizing the silicon pit
over the hill.

Children are self-focused and easily distracted by shiny objects(coins
and dollars), toys(every developer aspires to a blackberry, segway,
Lotus, etc ad n.), and approval (titles like... 'technological
evangilist come to mind).

Leigh