On Mar 5, 2007, at 1:56 PM, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
* brian d foy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-04T12:09:26]
I'm not talking about the particular field name, but the idea that
I'd want to say in META.yml Don't send me mail, or whatever
setting I want.
Instead of having to disable (or enable) CC for
On Mar 6, 2007, at 1:34 AM, Smylers wrote:
Ovid writes:
Schwern ... does not object to renaming TAPx::Parser to TAP::Parser.
I would rather not have the intermediate step of TAPx::Parser -
TAP::Parser - Test::Harness 3.0.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com =
Does anyone apart from Thomas Klausner know anything about the status
of CPANTS? It's been down for about five days now.
I'm trying to offer him free hosting for it but he doesn't seem to be
getting his mail just now either.
--
Andy Armstrong, hexten.net
--- Andy Lester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would rather not have the intermediate step of TAPx::Parser -
TAP::Parser - Test::Harness 3.0.
Test::Harness 3.0 will eventually be a separate distribution. There
will still be a TAP::Parser with TAP::Harness in that distribution.
Cheers,
Ovid
--
Hi!
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 02:34:16PM +, Andy Armstrong wrote:
Does anyone apart from Thomas Klausner know anything about the status
of CPANTS? It's been down for about five days now.
I'm trying to offer him free hosting for it but he doesn't seem to be
getting his mail just now
Thomas Klausner wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 02:34:16PM +, Andy Armstrong wrote:
Does anyone apart from Thomas Klausner know anything about the status
of CPANTS? It's been down for about five days now.
I'm trying to offer him free hosting for it but he doesn't seem to be
Hi!
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 10:01:09AM -0500, Christopher H. Laco wrote:
It's the CPANTS shuffle! Isn't this like, server/host 3 or so? :-)
It is, which is my punishment for beeing to lazy to set up my own
server :-)
--
#!/usr/bin/perl http://domm.zsi.at
Thomas Klausner wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 10:01:09AM -0500, Christopher H. Laco wrote:
It's the CPANTS shuffle! Isn't this like, server/host 3 or so? :-)
It is, which is my punishment for beeing to lazy to set up my own
server :-)
No, lazy is good. Don't let anyone fool
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6 Mar 2007, at 15:01, Christopher H. Laco wrote:
It's the CPANTS shuffle! Isn't this like, server/host 3 or so? :-)
I had noticed a certain ... mobility :)
- --
Andy Armstrong, hexten.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6
Has anyone done any perl fuzz-testing - that is, written something that
generates valid but silly code in an attempt to find errors in the
interpreter or in a module?
It seems like a worthwhile thing to do, but I'm struggling to imagine
what it would look like, particularly for testing
Hi Dave,
Has anyone done any perl fuzz-testing - that is, written something that
generates valid but silly code in an attempt to find errors in the
interpreter or in a module?
Is Acme::BadExample what you're looking for? The module that spawned a
brilliant and enlightening talk by Jos at
David Cantrell wrote:
Has anyone done any perl fuzz-testing - that is, written something that
generates valid but silly code in an attempt to find errors in the
interpreter or in a module?
It seems like a worthwhile thing to do, but I'm struggling to imagine
what it would look like,
Really hard. I've been trying to fix Test::Builder's behavior with abnormal
overloaded objects. This started with DateTime which can stringify and
compare but not numify. This revealed that cmp_ok() isn't testing
overloaded objects correctly, it always stringifies or numifies before
Eric Wilhelm wrote:
At the bottom of a test file:
{my $finish = 1; END {$finish or die \n unplanned exit}};
Yeah, you have to remember to put it at the end of the file, but it may
be easier than counting tests. Thoughts? Maybe an 'until_done'
directive and 'tests_done' function? Ways
Andy Lester wrote:
On Mar 3, 2007, at 8:15 PM, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
Yeah, you have to remember to put it at the end of the file, but it may
be easier than counting tests.
Good Lord do I get frustrated at the handwringing over test counting.
Look, it's simple. You write your tests. You run
Graham Barr wrote:
What I think brian is saying, and I agree, is that he does not want
to have to say don't send me mail N times. Where N is between 1
and, um I don't know. Haw many tools will there ever be that want
to send mail back to the author and what will their names be ?
So as well as
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Eric Wilhelm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you saying that you want a per-author META.yml or that you don't
want to have to say don't send me mail in two places in each
distribution, or both?
I'm not proposing anything. I think I siad that before.
I just don't
Barbie wrote:
Hi Dave,
Has anyone done any perl fuzz-testing - that is, written something that
generates valid but silly code in an attempt to find errors in the
interpreter or in a module?
Is Acme::BadExample what you're looking for? The module that spawned a
brilliant and enlightening
18 matches
Mail list logo
