# from Andy Armstrong
# on Friday 09 March 2007 04:47 pm:
I'm just adding support for specifying the TAP version number[1] to
TAPx::Parser. It seems reasonable that the version, if present,
should be the first thing in the TAP.
I think that should always be the case. While I don't forsee
Eric Wilhelm wrote:
I think that should always be the case. While I don't forsee needing to
do it differently, I think it's safe to assume: if we ever need to
break that for some reason, then it's a newer version of TAP.
Taking that logic a step further, I vote YAGNI on the complete
