2010/1/3 Eric Wilhelm enoba...@gmail.com
add one more level and make
the tab be History, then history.html is a page which says a
href=phalanxPhalanx 100/a started in 2003...
Perhaps somebody would like to put together a more comprehensive
QA timeline including the development of
Please note this is cross posted.
2010/1/2 James E Keenan jkeen_via_goo...@yahoo.com
Leo Lapworth wrote:
3) Phalanx
Though in one sense it pains me to say it, Phalanx does not need to be a
major tab. It can be demoted to a link somewhere.
snip history of the project
I have put it is as
want to join/help instead of demoting the page to historical value
only?
3) What context is the most useful one to promote a project within?
(Finished? Current projects? Community efforts?)
I suggest that the qa.perl.org frontpage does NOT link to old
(which in a software context usually
the mission statement/overview type page
we have now, then this would be it. :)
But, to the best of my knowledge, there's no active Phalanx project
per se at the present time. So it doesn't need to be quite so
prominent on qa.perl.org.
I'd instead decide prominence on the _intention_ of activity
For the record, I'll second Barbie's suggestion.
David
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Barbie bar...@missbarbell.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:10:48PM -0500, David Golden wrote:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Leo Lapworth l...@cuckoo.org wrote:
2) Testing CPAN
Shaun, would
Hi,
2010/1/2 Salve J Nilsen s...@pvv.org
A few comments,
Thanks.
Leo Lapworth said:
2010/1/2 James E Keenan jkeen_via_goo...@yahoo.com
3) Phalanx
Though in one sense it pains me to say it, Phalanx does not need to be a
major tab. It can be demoted to a link somewhere.
snip
I missed this - apologies.
Now uploaded.
Cheers
Leo
2010/1/2 David Golden xda...@gmail.com
For the record, I'll second Barbie's suggestion.
David
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Barbie bar...@missbarbell.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:10:48PM -0500, David Golden wrote:
On
# from Leo Lapworth
# on Saturday 02 January 2010 08:35:
I've renamed Old to Archive, but you've not actually told me what
would be best for the other stuff.
Archive still implies Old. Why not take the tab out of the
navigation bar entirely? Or, at least add one more level and make the
tab
How about inactive rather than archive or old.
--
Shaun Fryer
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Eric Wilhelm enoba...@gmail.com wrote:
# from Leo Lapworth
# on Saturday 02 January 2010 08:35:
I've renamed Old to Archive, but you've not actually told me what
would be best for the other
I've renamed to 'inactive' for now.
I like Eric's idea about history if someone wants to create that.
Cheers
Leo
2010/1/2 Shaun Fryer sfr...@sourcery.ca
How about inactive rather than archive or old.
--
Shaun Fryer
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Eric Wilhelm enoba...@gmail.com wrote:
--- On Sat, 2/1/10, Leo Lapworth l...@cuckoo.org wrote:
From: Leo Lapworth l...@cuckoo.org
I've renamed to 'inactive' for now.
I like Eric's idea about history if someone wants to create
that.
I'll second that. From a pure marketing perspective, archive, inactive and
old all imply dead.
# from Leo Lapworth
# on Saturday 02 January 2010 10:57:
I've renamed to 'inactive' for now.
I like Eric's idea about history if someone wants to create that.
add one more level and make
the tab be History, then history.html is a page which says a
href=phalanxPhalanx 100/a started in
Leo Lapworth wrote:
Hi,
Please note this is cross posted.
Several of the QA people have kindly said they will help with updating
http://qa.perl.org/.
3) Phalanx
Though in one sense it pains me to say it, Phalanx does not need to be a
major tab. It can be demoted to a link somewhere
1) Testing your code - I think this will need the largest amount of work.
Hilary, could I ask you to have a look at this?
- Are the articles the best we can link to?
- Do we need those articles if we update the rest of the content.
- can the test-modules.html and testing-guidelines.html
1) Testing your code - I think this will need the largest amount of work.
Hilary, could I ask you to have a look at this?
- Are the articles the best we can link to?
- Do we need those articles if we update the rest of the content.
- can the test-modules.html and testing-guidelines.html
On Tuesday 29 Dec 2009 23:54:26 Leo Lapworth wrote:
Hi,
Please note this is cross posted.
Several of the QA people have kindly said they will help with updating
http://qa.perl.org/.
I'm cross posting to
http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/perl-org-patches
I've split
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:10:48PM -0500, David Golden wrote:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Leo Lapworth l...@cuckoo.org wrote:
2) Testing CPAN
Shaun, would you mind looking at this?
- Just needs a quick review/update
The CPAN Testers stuff looks fine to me. The Daily Build
On Wednesday 30 Dec 2009 10:50:35 Shlomi Fish wrote:
On Tuesday 29 Dec 2009 23:54:26 Leo Lapworth wrote:
Hi,
Please note this is cross posted.
Several of the QA people have kindly said they will help with updating
http://qa.perl.org/.
I'm cross posting to
http
Should have hit reply all!
I've applied most of this patch.
2009/12/30 Leo Lapworth l...@cuckoo.org
2009/12/30 Shlomi Fish shlo...@iglu.org.il
On Wednesday 30 Dec 2009 10:50:35 Shlomi Fish wrote:
On Tuesday 29 Dec 2009 23:54:26 Leo Lapworth wrote:
3) Phalanx
Shlomi, would you look
Hi,
Please note this is cross posted.
Several of the QA people have kindly said they will help with updating
http://qa.perl.org/.
I'm cross posting to
http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/perl-org-patches
I've split out the site a bit more, so there is a 'testing your code
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Leo Lapworth l...@cuckoo.org wrote:
2) Testing CPAN
Shaun, would you mind looking at this?
- Just needs a quick review/update
The CPAN Testers stuff looks fine to me. The Daily Build section
should really go to a new tab Testing Perl or Testing Perl Source
2009/12/20 Salve J Nilsen s...@pvv.org
Hi, Leo! Welcome to perl-qa! :)
Thanks
Sweet. But does ALL of it need an update? If not, which parts are you
specifically thinking of?
Probably not all of it.
Is anyone interested in doing this?
Wow lots of you are, Thanks Hilary and Shaun as
On Saturday 19 Dec 2009 14:54:42 Leo Lapworth wrote:
Hi,
I cleaned up http://qa.perl.org/ but the content needs a complete
review/update.
Is anyone interested in doing this?
I am!
You can contact me here:
http://www.shlomifish.org/me/contact-me/
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
I've
Hi,
I cleaned up http://qa.perl.org/ but the content needs a complete
review/update.
Is anyone interested in doing this?
I've chatted with several people, but so far not found anyone interested.
If no one is interested we'll shut down the site as a lot has changed and we
now have CPAN Testers
Hi, Leo! Welcome to perl-qa! :)
Leo Lapworth said:
Hi,
I cleaned up http://qa.perl.org/ but the content needs a complete
review/update.
Sweet. But does ALL of it need an update? If not, which parts are you
specifically thinking of?
Is anyone interested in doing this?
Ask me
On 2005-07-09, Nik Clayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://qa.perl.org/phalanx/kwalitee.html says:
What is kwalitee?
Kwalitee is inexact quality. We don't know exactly what it is,
but we know it when we see it.
Isn't that backwards? I thought 'kwalitee' was supposed
On Wednesday 08 March 2006 13:15, Mark Stosberg wrote:
Kwalitee are precise metrics which strive to approximate quality. The
name is intentionally different to convey that Kwalitee is related to
quality, but not quite the real thing. That's because we don't know
exactly what quality is,
http://qa.perl.org/phalanx/kwalitee.html says:
What is kwalitee?
Kwalitee is inexact quality. We don't know exactly what it is,
but we know it when we see it.
Isn't that backwards? I thought 'kwalitee' was supposed to be a metric
that was exact, and that (hopefully) had some
--- Andy Lester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patches, please. s/html$/pod/ in the URL for the source.
Sorry. I should have gotten these out sooner. I was sidetracked.
I've attached patches to add Test::MockModule to the module list and to
add the use_ok() or die wording to the testing
http://qa.perl.org/testing-guidelines.html is updated. So is
http://qa.perl.org/test-modules.html, with new modules and some
reorganization.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
://qa.perl.org/testing-guidelines.html is updated. So is
http://qa.perl.org/test-modules.html, with new modules and some
reorganization.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
=
Silence is Evil
http://users.easystreet.com/ovid
There are a couple of minor tweaks to qa.perl.org. Soon, I'll have a
page up for the Phalanx project and THEN we'll have ourselves a good
time!
xoa
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
Getting the word out about the various projects is something we
need, so I made
http://qa.perl.org/
Schwern, I need some comments from you. :-)
- ask
--
ask bjoern hansen, http://ask.netcetera.dk/ !try; do();
33 matches
Mail list logo
