Can someone tell me what causes this failure?
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2008/09/msg2187300.html
the latest Module::Inspector (1.05) is installed
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-Inspector/
and that module has not test failure at all.
Gabor
On 8 Aug 2008, at 20:46, David E. Wheeler wrote:
I've started fiddling with the stdout option to TAP::Harness. It's
nice, although it doesn't capture everything. I mean, I think it
does, but stuff still gets sent to STDOUT, too. The best way to keep
stuff from also going to STDOUT appears
Today I'm pleased to announce the launch of the CPAN Testers' Collated
Email Notification of Tester Reports for Authors Service [1], a
centralised notification system to send authors email updates for the
reports, that were previously sent by testers to the authors directly.
David has now updated
On 11 Sep 2008, at 15:19, Barbie wrote:
[snip good stuff about test reports]
Thank you! :)
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
On Sep 11, 2008, at 05:09, Andy Armstrong wrote:
On 8 Aug 2008, at 20:46, David E. Wheeler wrote:
I've started fiddling with the stdout option to TAP::Harness. It's
nice, although it doesn't capture everything. I mean, I think it
does, but stuff still gets sent to STDOUT, too. The best way
On Sep 11, 2008, at 10:47, Andy Armstrong wrote:
According to svn blame:
470 andy sub summary {
481 andy my ( $self, $aggregate ) = @_;
791 andy
754 andy return if $self-silent;
So I'd say the summary it's been there for a while :)
(we're currently up
On 11 Sep 2008, at 19:11, David E. Wheeler wrote:
According to svn blame:
470 andy sub summary {
481 andy my ( $self, $aggregate ) = @_;
791 andy
754 andy return if $self-silent;
So I'd say the summary it's been there for a while :)
(we're currently up to
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 7:19 AM, Barbie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[1] If you can think of a suitable word beginning with 'L' to replace
'Service' let me know ;)
Labors?
I got my first such note this morning, and greatly appreciate it!
--
Randy J. Ray / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Silicon Valley Scale
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 4:56 AM, Gabor Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone tell me what causes this failure?
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2008/09/msg2187300.html
the latest Module::Inspector (1.05) is installed
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-Inspector/
and
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:34:18PM -0700, Randy J. Ray wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 4:56 AM, Gabor Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone tell me what causes this failure?
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2008/09/msg2187300.html
the latest Module::Inspector
# from Randy J. Ray
# on Thursday 11 September 2008 12:22:
[1] If you can think of a suitable word beginning with 'L' to
replace 'Service' let me know ;)
Labors?
CENTRAS would probably google better than CENTRAL, but my thought
was too bad Xs aren't cool anymore (hmm, but could you pull it
Barbie wrote:
The notification system will run once a day and collate a list of the
links to the reports via the web interface on the NNTP server. As such,
you will no longer receive huge reports in your inbox, but at most just
one email a day containing a list of links to your reports. You
Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
* David Golden [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-05 21:10]:
* After a period of time to allow people to opt-in, the default
policy for authors without a stated preference will be
changed to no mail.
From that point on, CPAN Testers will be a purely opt-in
On Sep 11, 2008, at 14:17, Michael G Schwern wrote:
Because they all come in at one lump, I have to deal with them in
one lump.
There's no easy system to tell which ones I've dealt with
(previously I'd just
delete the mail) and which ones I haven't.
The way it looks right now, I want my
Barbie wrote, some time around 11/09/2008 16:19:
Today I'm pleased to announce the launch of the CPAN Testers' Collated
Email Notification of Tester Reports for Authors Service [1], a
[...]
[1] If you can think of a suitable word beginning with 'L' to replace
'Service' let me know ;)
Hmm,
David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Sep 11, 2008, at 14:17, Michael G Schwern wrote:
Because they all come in at one lump, I have to deal with them in one
lump.
There's no easy system to tell which ones I've dealt with (previously
I'd just
delete the mail) and which ones I haven't.
The way it
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 02:17:41PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
Ick. I hope I'm missing something obvious maybe?
The bit where I get flamed. Again. Thanks.
Can you explain how you survived previously when testers would wait
several days before testing distributions? When you'd get a
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 01:35:07PM -0700, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
# from Randy J. Ray
# on Thursday 11 September 2008 12:22:
[1] If you can think of a suitable word beginning with 'L' to
replace 'Service' let me know ;)
Labors?
for L... I got nothing.
I spent far more time than I should have
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 02:17:41PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
The way it looks right now, I want my CC's back. :(
My understanding of The Plan is that you will be able to get them back
soon, once that bit is written.
--
David Cantrell | Reality Engineer, Ministry of Information
NANOG
Barbie wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 02:17:41PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
Ick. I hope I'm missing something obvious maybe?
The bit where I get flamed. Again. Thanks.
You're welcome. :)
Oh, you're in a hellish spot, I realize. And it sucks. Thank you very much
for putting so much
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The way it looks right now, I want my CC's back. :(
Well, I guess we win some and we lose some.
Just brainstorming for the moment, but if we had an option to forward
all your FAIL or UNKNOWN reports to the
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They'll be sent out early morning (~2am) UK time, so should be waiting
in you inbox first think in the morning.
Ok, I have to wait until the beginning of the next day to fix the problem.
FYI, I have 90% of my POE nag
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED], David
Golden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The way it looks right now, I want my CC's back. :(
Well, I guess we win some and we lose some.
Just brainstorming for the moment, but if we had
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 7:32 PM, brian d foy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just brainstorming for the moment, but if we had an option to forward
all your FAIL or UNKNOWN reports to the distribution's RT queue
Ouch. Some people might want that, but only as an opt-in thing please.
Purely opt-in.
* Eric Wilhelm [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-11 22:40]:
CENTRAS would probably google better than CENTRAL
It seems to be a moderately popular business name and also
appears to be a word in several languages. It won’t be as bad
as googling “CENTRAL” but it won’t be exactly ideal either.
However, if
25 matches
Mail list logo
