Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The ones that bother me are the Pod::* tests. I know Pod::Parser's CPAN
version has tests. Pod::Text Pod::Man (the podulators),
unfortunately, do not. Pod::LaTeX only has a compile test.
I'd love it if someone would generalize the Pod::Parser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
attached is a revised version of pod_cover.pl which you can use to test a
whole distribution using the new v0.06 API.
Pod::Coverage 0.06 is still falsely reporting the overload thingies as
naked - that should not happen per default since these subs do
@@ -739,3 +783,9 @@
# keep this last - doesn't seem to work otherwise?
This requirement magically went away while I was away?
eval a.b.c.d.e.f;sub
EXPECT
+
+ perlbug ID 20010831.001
+($a, b) = (1, 2);
+EXPECT
+Can't modify constant item in list assignment at - line 1, near
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 11:56:01AM +0200, Tels wrote:
On 02-Sep-01 Michael G Schwern tried to scribble about:
Okay, part two of the t/op/misc.t cleanup. This one deletes
t/run/segfault.t (redundant) and moves t/op/misc.t to the more
descriptive t/run/kill_perl.t
--- MANIFEST
I think the wholesale renaming of t/op/misc as t/run/kill_perl is
really wrong.
(I think you are reading too much into the leading comments, and other
people have been reading too little into them.)
t/op/misc has NOT consistently been the place for core-dumping tests;
it has some yes, but not
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 05:05:43PM +0300, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
I think the wholesale renaming of t/op/misc as t/run/kill_perl is
really wrong.
(I think you are reading too much into the leading comments, and other
people have been reading too little into them.)
t/op/misc has NOT
