RE: [librecat-dev] A common MARC record path language

2014-02-25 Thread PHILLIPS M.E.
You also could consider to grok Jason Thomale's Interpreting MARC: Where's the Bibliographic Data? http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/3832 That's a very good article, as it highlights the problems of the prescribed punctuation both getting in the way of extracting parts of the data and its

Re: [librecat-dev] A common MARC record path language

2014-02-25 Thread Thomas Berger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 25.02.2014 12:50, schrieb PHILLIPS M.E.: If we are just talking about ISO 2709, the whole family of MARC formats in general, then you have to remember that UNIMARC and obsolete formats like UKMARC have very different requirements. UKMARC and

Re: [librecat-dev] A common MARC record path language

2014-02-24 Thread Thomas Berger
Carsten, Thank you both for bringing the discussion forward. I must admit that I'm having some problems following here. I read your mails multiple times, really trying to understand your demands. After reading this [1], I hope I'm getting closer. You also could consider to grok Jason

AW: [librecat-dev] A common MARC record path language

2014-02-23 Thread Klee, Carsten
-...@mail.librecat.org; perl4lib@perl.org Betreff: Re: [librecat-dev] A common MARC record path language -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Carsten, I think the whole problem lies in the limited expressivity of strings. MARCspec is pretty much close to XPath at its approach

AW: [librecat-dev] A common MARC record path language

2014-02-19 Thread Klee, Carsten
] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. Februar 2014 01:04 An: Klee, Carsten; 'Patrick Hochstenbach' Cc: v...@gbv.de; librecat-...@mail.librecat.org; perl4lib@perl.org Betreff: Re: [librecat-dev] A common MARC record path language -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 18.02.2014 17:47

RE: [librecat-dev] A common MARC record path language

2014-02-19 Thread Patrick Hochstenbach
; perl4lib@perl.org Subject: AW: [librecat-dev] A common MARC record path language Hi Thomas and Patrick! I think the whole problem lies in the limited expressivity of strings. MARCspec is pretty much close to XPath at its approach, but without regular expressions and functions like first(), last

AW: AW: [librecat-dev] A common MARC record path language

2014-02-18 Thread Klee, Carsten
An: Klee, Carsten; v...@gbv.de; librecat-...@mail.librecat.org; perl4lib@perl.org Betreff: Re: AW: [librecat-dev] A common MARC record path language Hi Carsten Excuses for the late reply, it took some while to get the system booted after winter vacations. You are right in the discussion

Re: AW: [librecat-dev] A common MARC record path language

2014-01-21 Thread Patrick Hochstenbach
Betreff: Re: [librecat-dev] A common MARC record path language Hi Thanks for this initiative to formalise the path language for MARC records. In Catmandu our path language is better described at: https://metacpan.org/pod/Catmandu::Fix::marc_map. It would be an easy fix for us to follow CarstenĀ¹s

AW: [librecat-dev] A common MARC record path language

2014-01-06 Thread Klee, Carsten
An: v...@gbv.de; librecat-...@mail.librecat.org; perl4lib@perl.org Cc: Klee, Carsten Betreff: Re: [librecat-dev] A common MARC record path language Hi Thanks for this initiative to formalise the path language for MARC records. In Catmandu our path language is better described at: https