You also could consider to grok Jason Thomale's Interpreting MARC:
Where's the Bibliographic Data? http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/3832
That's a very good article, as it highlights the problems of the prescribed
punctuation both getting in the way of extracting parts of the data and its
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 25.02.2014 12:50, schrieb PHILLIPS M.E.:
If we are just talking about ISO 2709, the whole family of MARC formats in
general, then you have to remember that UNIMARC and obsolete formats like
UKMARC
have very different requirements. UKMARC and
Carsten,
Thank you both for bringing the discussion forward. I must admit that I'm
having some problems following here. I read your mails multiple times, really
trying to understand your demands. After reading this [1], I hope I'm getting
closer.
You also could consider to grok Jason
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Thomas Berger [mailto:t...@gymel.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. Februar 2014 01:04
An: Klee, Carsten; 'Patrick Hochstenbach'
Cc: v...@gbv.de; librecat-...@mail.librecat.org; perl4lib@perl.org
Betreff: Re: [librecat-dev] A common MARC record path language
