Re: [PATCH] Encode.pm docs fix

2001-09-10 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 03:24:01PM +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote: --- Encode.pm.old Fri Sep 7 10:08:03 2001 +++ Encode.pm Mon Sep 10 15:17:17 2001 @@ -667,11 +667,11 @@ to transfer strings in this form (e.g. to write them to a file) would need to -

Re: [ID 20010909.026] Not OK: perl v5.7.2 +DEVEL11937 on MSWin32-x86-multi-thread 4.0 (UNINSTALLED)

2001-09-10 Thread John Peacock
Andreas Fehr wrote: Strange, cause all 'released'-versions I have are 100% OK (5.6.1, 5.7.1, 5.7.2). So there might be people with other ideas of whether tests have to pass or not. One of the usual ways to fix test errors under Win32 is to route around it (i.e. skip for that platform).

Re: [ID 20010909.026] Not OK: perl v5.7.2 +DEVEL11937 on MSWin32-x86-multi-thread 4.0 (UNINSTALLED)

2001-09-10 Thread John Peacock
Andreas Fehr wrote: Strange, cause all 'released'-versions I have are 100% OK (5.6.1, 5.7.1, 5.7.2). So there might be people with other ideas of whether tests have to pass or not. One of the usual ways to fix test errors under Win32 is to route around it (i.e. skip for that platform).