Well, almost half a year have passed since this bugreport. :)
Now everything works fine indeed, you can close it.
Cheers,
Alexander Temerev
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Will Coleda via RT
perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org wrote:
On Tue Sep 08 04:32:07 2009, sor...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried
Hi,
Little Walker wrote:
I've been looking around to see if there's been any discussion of
introducing functional programming-style pattern matching for method/
function dispatch. Could someone point me to any such discussions?
It's done multi dispatch in Perl 6, and you can find an
Hi,
Kiffin Gish wrote:
How can recall previous commands (history) using ./perl6 without getting
^[[A^[[A instead?
You need to have readline development files installed when configuring
and building Rakudo, then it just works[tm].
In the configure steps it should say
auto::readline -
Each line is executed independently. Local variables from 1 line of code
will not persist between returns.
Some things do persist though, classes for instance will persist, roles will
persist, grammars will persist, but sub routines will not, neither will
variables. I believe there are plans for
# New Ticket Created by Carl Mäsak
# Please include the string: [perl #73462]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=73462
moritz_ rakudo: say ('a' ~~ /a/).WHAT
p6eval rakudo 16efb6: OUTPUT«Regex::Match()»
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Moritz Lenz via RT
perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org wrote:
Does this problem still persist with a current Rakudo?
nope
--
cognominal stef
That's almost exactly the example from:
http://perlcabal.org/syn/S06.html#Unpacking_tree_node_parameters
1. I feel incredibly embarrassed to have missed this
2. This is awesome!
# New Ticket Created by Carl Mäsak
# Please include the string: [perl #73460]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=73460
moritz_ rakudo: my $x = *; say $x.WHAT
p6eval rakudo de996e: OUTPUT«Block()»
moritz_
Which is pretty powerful, really.
Absolutely - I think you're referring to the 'type subset' stuff which
is great.
This is where Perl 6 is not the same as functional
languages, since it's got an imperative OO element as well.
True, there can be friction between the functional style and OO,
Does the unpacking participate in dispatch? If a Hash comes in as $t
with no 'left' key, will it fail to match?
On Tuesday, March 9, 2010, Little Walker en...@dircon.co.uk wrote:
Which is pretty powerful, really.
Absolutely - I think you're referring to the 'type subset' stuff which
is
Mark ():
Does the unpacking participate in dispatch? If a Hash comes in as $t
with no 'left' key, will it fail to match?
Yes.
$ perl6 -e 'sub foo(%h($left)) { say $left }; foo({ left = OH HAI })'
OH HAI
$ perl6 -e 'sub foo(%h($left)) {}; foo({ no = left key })'
Not enough positional
Oh, wow. I was just asking about the spec; didn't know this stuff
already worked. Rakudos to the team! :)
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Carl Mäsak cma...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark ():
Does the unpacking participate in dispatch? If a Hash comes in as $t
with no 'left' key, will it fail to
12 matches
Mail list logo
