(I've seen the Perl 6 RFC).
I think this idea would be really good for Perl 6, because, in my opinion,
POD is lacking.
Lacking how?
--
Sean M. Burkehttp://search.cpan.org/~sburke/
- 30,000 BC
dtUpper Paleolithic dd30,000 - 10,000 BC
dtEpipaleolithic Era dd1 - c. 5500 BC
dtPredynastic Period dd5500 - 3100 BC
/dl
But frankly, I don't see this as a /pressing/ problem.
--
Sean M. Burkehttp://search.cpan.org/~sburke/
anyone would ever want to use.
But I wouldn't object if it were the only Pod parser anyone could ever use
-- or at least =use with. After all, like XML::Parser (well, plus SAX),
it presents every kind of sane markup interface anyone would ever want.
--
Sean M. Burkehttp://search.cpan.org
they're not talking about Pod at all, but just
some some appalling old version of Pod::Html or Pod::Man. It's like
complaining that Perl doesn't have objects since you never know when you'll
be using Perl 4.
--
Sean M. Burkehttp://search.cpan.org/author/sburke/
), it means @x[2,3]. Similarly, *x is
length($x) or scalar(@x) or scalar(keys %x), depending. And, one I've
always liked: ?x for a string is a random character, and for a list or
table, a random element.
--
Sean M. Burke[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.spinn.net/~sburke/
