On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 09:38:31AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now?
If so, a 0.0.5 bugfix release may well be in order.
--
Everything I wanted to get in to a 0.0.5 release is there now.
With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now?
If so, a 0.0.5 bugfix release may well be in order.
--
Dan
--it's like this---
Dan Sugalski even samurai
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now?
If so, a 0.0.5 bugfix release may well be in order.
The one outstanding issue that I know of is the mem_realloc problem in
add_pmc_to_free and add_header_to_free. Since the problem
At 09:38 AM 3/30/2002 -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now? If so,
a 0.0.5 bugfix release may well be in order.
My crashme program crashes no more, we are 10x more stable than
a week ago. I think Peter's patch or a variation is in order
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 09:38:31AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now?
If so, a 0.0.5 bugfix release may well be in order.
--
I'm still getting a test failure on stacks.t, in test #7. Until that's
fixed, I'm holding off committing
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:47:11AM -0800, Steve Fink wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 09:38:31AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now?
If so, a 0.0.5 bugfix release may well be in order.
--
I'm still getting a test failure
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:52:35AM -0500, Melvin Smith wrote:
At 09:38 AM 3/30/2002 -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now? If so,
a 0.0.5 bugfix release may well be in order.
My crashme program crashes no more, we are 10x more stable
At 6:45 PM + 3/30/02, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:52:35AM -0500, Melvin Smith wrote:
At 09:38 AM 3/30/2002 -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now? If so,
a 0.0.5 bugfix release may well be in order.
My
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now?
If so, a 0.0.5 bugfix release may well be in order.
The one outstanding issue that I know of is the mem_realloc problem in
add_pmc_to_free and add_header_to_free. Since the problem
At 04:59 PM 3/30/2002 +0200, Peter Gibbs wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now?
If so, a 0.0.5 bugfix release may well be in order.
The one outstanding issue that I know of is the mem_realloc problem in
add_pmc_to_free
At 06:45 PM 3/30/2002 +, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:52:35AM -0500, Melvin Smith wrote:
At 09:38 AM 3/30/2002 -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now? If
so,
a 0.0.5 bugfix release may well be in order.
My
11 matches
Mail list logo