Re: Bugfix release?

2002-04-02 Thread Steve Fink
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 09:38:31AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now? If so, a 0.0.5 bugfix release may well be in order. -- Everything I wanted to get in to a 0.0.5 release is there now.

Bugfix release?

2002-03-30 Thread Dan Sugalski
With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now? If so, a 0.0.5 bugfix release may well be in order. -- Dan --it's like this--- Dan Sugalski even samurai

Re: Bugfix release?

2002-03-30 Thread Peter Gibbs
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now? If so, a 0.0.5 bugfix release may well be in order. The one outstanding issue that I know of is the mem_realloc problem in add_pmc_to_free and add_header_to_free. Since the problem

Re: Bugfix release?

2002-03-30 Thread Melvin Smith
At 09:38 AM 3/30/2002 -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now? If so, a 0.0.5 bugfix release may well be in order. My crashme program crashes no more, we are 10x more stable than a week ago. I think Peter's patch or a variation is in order

Re: Bugfix release?

2002-03-30 Thread Steve Fink
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 09:38:31AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now? If so, a 0.0.5 bugfix release may well be in order. -- I'm still getting a test failure on stacks.t, in test #7. Until that's fixed, I'm holding off committing

Re: Bugfix release?

2002-03-30 Thread Steve Fink
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:47:11AM -0800, Steve Fink wrote: On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 09:38:31AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now? If so, a 0.0.5 bugfix release may well be in order. -- I'm still getting a test failure

Re: Bugfix release?

2002-03-30 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:52:35AM -0500, Melvin Smith wrote: At 09:38 AM 3/30/2002 -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now? If so, a 0.0.5 bugfix release may well be in order. My crashme program crashes no more, we are 10x more stable

Re: Bugfix release?

2002-03-30 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 6:45 PM + 3/30/02, Nicholas Clark wrote: On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:52:35AM -0500, Melvin Smith wrote: At 09:38 AM 3/30/2002 -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now? If so, a 0.0.5 bugfix release may well be in order. My

Re: Bugfix release?

2002-03-30 Thread Michel J Lambert
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now? If so, a 0.0.5 bugfix release may well be in order. The one outstanding issue that I know of is the mem_realloc problem in add_pmc_to_free and add_header_to_free. Since the problem

Re: Bugfix release?

2002-03-30 Thread Melvin Smith
At 04:59 PM 3/30/2002 +0200, Peter Gibbs wrote: Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now? If so, a 0.0.5 bugfix release may well be in order. The one outstanding issue that I know of is the mem_realloc problem in add_pmc_to_free

Re: Bugfix release?

2002-03-30 Thread Melvin Smith
At 06:45 PM 3/30/2002 +, Nicholas Clark wrote: On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:52:35AM -0500, Melvin Smith wrote: At 09:38 AM 3/30/2002 -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now? If so, a 0.0.5 bugfix release may well be in order. My