[perl #17007] [PATCH] Re: HP-UX state report

2002-09-04 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty # Please include the string: [perl #17007] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17007 On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Andy Dougherty wrote: For perl5, the main makefile calls

HP-UX state report

2002-01-09 Thread H . Merijn Brand
HP-UX is very unwilling at this stage, including two show-stoppers 1. The LDFLAGS is extended with flags from config that are meant to be passed to cc, not to ld 2. Undefined symbols inhibit the basic build a5:/pro/3gl/CPAN/parrot-current 101 perl Configure.pl --default Parrot Version 0.0.3

Re: HP-UX state report

2002-01-09 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, H . Merijn Brand wrote: HP-UX is very unwilling at this stage, including two show-stoppers 1. The LDFLAGS is extended with flags from config that are meant to be passed to cc, not to ld Odd. On most Unix systems, $Config{ld} = 'cc'. Calling ld directly is usually

Re: HP-UX state report

2002-01-09 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 10:56 AM 1/9/2002 -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote: On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, H . Merijn Brand wrote: HP-UX is very unwilling at this stage, including two show-stoppers 1. The LDFLAGS is extended with flags from config that are meant to be passed to cc, not to ld Odd. On most Unix

Re: HP-UX state report

2002-01-09 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote: At 10:56 AM 1/9/2002 -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote: For perl5, the main makefile calls (essentially) $(CC) -o perl while the parrot Makefile calls $(LD) -o test_main I tend to think parrot's wrong here, but there might have