The attached patch adds a new stack type that only handles INTVALs.
These are much more efficient than generic stacks--on Win32 they shave a
few ten-thousandths of a second off each run of the rx_popindex op, and
take a full hundredth of a second off the benchmark. It also shows
performance
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 06:51:25PM -0500, Melvin Smith wrote:
Hey Nicholas,
Just to be clear, I wasn't directing my concern at anyone, nor am I
not glad for the work, heck you've probably contributed more to this project
than me. It was just a general concern that I felt should be thought
The following patch cleans up some 700+ warnings on my Solaris 8/gcc-2.8
system. I've bundled them all together since they are (I hope)
non-controversial.
Two hunks merit special mention: The first is removing -ansi
-pendantic, which I ranted about yesterday, and is necessary to apply
to get
Folks,
I've been downsized, and as a result I'm sans laptop for a bit. I'm going
to fix that soon, but until then my patch application will be a bit spotty
as I'm not quite set up for it.
So, if you've got commit privs and the patch passes muster on-list, or is
sensible, go commit it and we'll
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 01:30:42AM -0800, Brent Dax wrote:
The attached patch adds a new stack type that only handles INTVALs.
These are much more efficient than generic stacks--on Win32 they shave a
few ten-thousandths of a second off each run of the rx_popindex op, and
take a full hundredth
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 11:11:10AM -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote:
diff -r -u parrot/classes/pmc2c.pl parrot-andy/classes/pmc2c.pl
--- parrot/classes/pmc2c.pl Thu Jan 3 21:29:18 2002
+++ parrot-andy/classes/pmc2c.pl Wed Jan 16 10:57:04 2002
@@ -228,7 +228,12 @@
my $includes = '';
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 11:25:29AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
should (Andy, Steve, Nick, Melvin, other folks I've forgotten) go over to
dev.perl.com, set up an account, and pop me mail with your account
dev.perl.org
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Steve Fink wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 11:11:10AM -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote:
- fprintf(stderr, *** size %d\n,key-size);
+ fprintf(stderr, *** size INTVAL_FMT \n,key-size);
That's what I've been doing in my local copy, but is that portable? I
seem to
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Steve Fink wrote:
- fprintf(stderr, *** size %d\n,key-size);
+ fprintf(stderr, *** size INTVAL_FMT \n,key-size);
That's what I've been doing in my local copy, but is that portable? I
seem to remember that some preprocessors require strange tricks to
concatenate
Steve Fink:
# On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 01:30:42AM -0800, Brent Dax wrote:
# The attached patch adds a new stack type that only handles INTVALs.
# These are much more efficient than generic stacks--on Win32
# they shave a
# few ten-thousandths of a second off each run of the
# rx_popindex op,
10 matches
Mail list logo
