I'm sorry, this new weapon is going to give a quick advantage to the fools
side, but luckily, should help the fool-proofers in the long run.
Below patch should be safe to apply, as it does nothing. Turn on GC_DEBUG
if you want to see the hell that ensues. I'm working on a patch to fix the
issues
Applied :)
As far as a tinderbox-specific target, i'm all for it. I was thinking that
it might be better to have it be a perl script, since we could then have it
take care of doing the clean and rebuild the makefile appropriately.
I can take a stab at it tomorrow, if nobody else does.
--Josh
On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 07:44:11AM -0500, Michel J Lambert wrote:
I'm sorry, this new weapon is going to give a quick advantage to the fools
side, but luckily, should help the fool-proofers in the long run.
Which reminds me -- Dan, I hereby nominate Mike for commit access. :-)
For a tinderbox target, it is possible to have tinderclient run the tinder
and tindertest targets and then run the normal ones. If either fail, it will
give an error. That way we can ensure that nothing slips through. However,
this will double the tinderbox cycle time and use more resources on
