chromatic wrote:
With Apocalypse 12 (soon!)
I'm sorry but this just begs for the question: (vaguely) how soon? :)
I get all excited whenever I hear Perl and six in the same sentence,
and it's building up to be unbearable ;)
--
Robin Berjon
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 12:57, Simon Cozens wrote:
1. Larry gets help in writing these (various degrees of delegation).
I think we've been through this idea, no?
I dropped off the face of the earth for a bit... sorry if I am
re-hashing something old I did not see anything in the archives, but
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 07:30:05PM +0100, Robin Berjon wrote:
: chromatic wrote:
: With Apocalypse 12 (soon!)
:
: I'm sorry but this just begs for the question: (vaguely) how soon? :)
Well, here's the rough outline. I still have to do some writing on
multiple dispatch, overloading, and
chromatic With Apocalypse 12 (soon!)
RobinBerjon how soon? :)
LarryWall here's the rough outline
[indicating that it's pretty soon indeed]
Cool! But now I'm a little confused - what happened to Apocalypses 8
through 11? :)
-Mark
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 11:50, Mark J. Reed wrote:
Cool! But now I'm a little confused - what happened to Apocalypses 8
through 11? :)
They were:
- 8, References
- 9, Data Structures
- 10, Packages
- 11, Modules
Since 12, Objects is more important (and covers
2004-02-26T14:26:47 Larry Wall:
Well now, I remember Perl 0, sonny.
Does that still exist anywhere? I don't have anything older than
perl 1.
They don't make 'em like they used to...
That they don't. On Bent Linux (my own distro, based on uClibc
instead of glibc) I get
; ls -l perl1 perl5.8.1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry Wall) writes:
It's the coherence that I can't delegate, and if I tried to, we would
certainly end up with Second System Syndrome Done Wrong, instead of Done
Right.
You know, it's statements like this that make it hard for even me to
be curmudgeonly.
E7 is coming
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 13:42, Simon Cozens wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry Wall) writes:
It's the coherence that I can't delegate, and if I tried to, we would
certainly end up with Second System Syndrome Done Wrong, instead of Done
Right.
You know, it's statements like this that make it
SC == Simon Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SC [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bennett Todd) writes:
2004-02-26T14:26:47 Larry Wall:
Well now, I remember Perl 0, sonny.
Does that still exist anywhere?
SC If nowhere else, Larry's got a copy IN HIS HEAD. :)
better than a copy in his
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bennett Todd) writes:
2004-02-26T14:26:47 Larry Wall:
Well now, I remember Perl 0, sonny.
Does that still exist anywhere?
If nowhere else, Larry's got a copy IN HIS HEAD. :)
--
I have heard that the universe does not support atomic operations
(although I've not seen
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 12:31:04PM -0500, Aaron Sherman wrote:
: I cringe at what I'm about to ask because I know it's pushy, but thus is
: the burden of my impatience and hubris...
:
: There was a document:
:
: TITLE
: Apocalypse 1: The Ugly, the Bad, and the Good
:
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 09:31, Aaron Sherman wrote:
And in it Apocalypse #26 was mentioned. Above, Larry mentions #11. At
first the rate of 1 apolcalypse per month seemed to support the idea
that Perl 6 would be defined within the next couple of years. However,
trending shows that this function
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 03:22, Larry Wall wrote:
[...] RFC 74 proposes the same thing. But I classified it under
Apocalypse 11, Modules, which we skipped over to get to Objects
first. So it hasn't actually been discussed much.
[...]
most exportation will be done simply by marking the routines
13 matches
Mail list logo
