On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:11:42AM -0600, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 08:30:25AM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
So anyway, just because other languages call it a prelude doesn't
mean that we have to. Perl is the tail that's always trying to
wag the dog...
What is the
The concept of which metaops can apply to which other ops is looking
pretty clear.
The goal, as I understand it from Larry, is that while in general,
metaops should be allowed, we want to disallow them where they either
make no sense, or are very unlikely to be what the programmer thought
Author: particle
Date: 2009-02-01 01:26:46 +0100 (Sun, 01 Feb 2009)
New Revision: 25138
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S06-routines.pod
docs/Perl6/Spec/S19-commandline.pod
Log:
[spec] spelling, grammar, and other clarifications; TimToady++
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S06-routines.pod
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 01:21:57PM -0800, Mark Lentczner wrote:
Two exceptions to these lists:
sym, gets :value and :iso
sym% gets :bool as well
Also note that = is :value :iso despite being lumped with assignment.
I consider = to be equivalent to . in Lisp, so [=] is essentially
