Both pugs and rakudo agree on this one:
21:44 @moritz_ perl6: my (@a, @b); @a.push(@b.pop); say @a.elems
21:44 p6eval ..pugs, rakudo 34399: OUTPUT«1»
pop'ping from an empty array returns an undef, which is then pushed onto @a.
Wouldn't it be nice of @empty_list.pop (or .unshift) would return
Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Hi,
As smop and mildew now support ControlExceptionReturn (see
v6/mildew/t/return_function.t), an important question raised:
sub plural { return 1,2 }
sub singular { return 1 }
my @a = plural();
my $b = plural();
my @c = singular();
my $d = singular();
Carl Mäsak wrote:
Jonathan (), Ovid (), Larry ():
Can't say I really like the negated options though. They smell funny.
Agreed, but ltrim and rtrim will disappoint Israelis and dyslexics alike.
Suggestions welcome as I can't think of anything better.
The .Net framework calls 'em TrimStart
Ovid wrote:
What should this output?
my @array = ' foo ', ' bar ';
@array .= trim;
say @array.perl;
And what if I have an array of hashes of hashes of arrays?
Currently you can call 'trim' on arrays, but it's a no-op. Similar issues
with chomp and friends.
I think
fREW Schmidt wrote:
I just recently read Ovid's post on use Perl about how we can help by
fixing PUGS tests. I was a little clear on what he meant and I am a
little anxious to do something. I checked out the code for parrot
already and I am getting the pugs code while I write this. Anyone
A few months ago Larry proposed to add some testing
facilites to the language itself, because we want to
culturally encourage testing, and because the test
suite defines the language, so we need to specify the
behaviour of our testing facilities anyway.
We also discussed some possible changes to
Ovid wrote:
Regarding the disadvantages:
However nothing in life is free, we pay for it with a
few disadvantages:
* We nearly double the number of built-in operators
by adding an :ok multi
Yes, but conceptually this will be transparent to the end user, right?
They'll just know that
There are a few interesting points on which I'd like to comment
Richard Hainsworth wrote:
In other words, test functionality sufficient for the compiler may not
be adequate for module testing. But other functions can be developed in
Test modules that can be hooked into a general testing
Ovid wrote:
One concern is where Larry asks:
I wonder how often we'd have people making the error
of trying to interpoalte into :okbad $x pardner
I'd be one of them. The following is a very common idiom:
for my $method (@methods) {
can_ok $object, $method;
fREW Schmidt wrote:
I'd like to get started adding these:
is capitalize(:string($a)), Pugs Is Cool!, capitalize works with named
arg
rakudo and pugs both fail this test. Should I add it anyway?
Yes. We have a mechanism for skipping tests that the implementations
fail. Just write it like
pugs, rakudo and elf all agree that [1..4].elems should be 4 - and I
agree too.
What about
sub f(@a) { @a.elems }; say f([1, 2, 3, 4])
Again all three implementations say that it's 4, and I'm confused.
Now for
say elems [1, 2, 3, 4]
pugs says 4, rakudo says 1, and elf says Undefined subroutine
pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
+PERL# Lexical symbols in the standard perlude
Did you mean prelude instead?
Moritz
implementation that can later be shared among
compilers.
Perl 6 is full of stuff that's specced but not implemented, and I'd like
to see that gap closed as much as possible.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://perlgeek.de/ | http://perl-6.de/ | http://sudokugarden.de/
these forms strike me as odd because the where clause
should return a boolean and thus has to be written 'where { $_ == 2}'.
A where clause without a block does a smartmatch, so $i where 2 is the
same as $i where { $i ~~ 2 }.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://perlgeek.de/ | http://perl-6.de
- any objections?
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://perlgeek.de/ | http://perl-6.de/ | http://sudokugarden.de/
Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Moritz Lenz wrote:
Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
Another question for everyone - is there some way I can extend a class
in such a way that it implements another role?
class A does B does C { ... }
where B and C are roles.
For example, say I
a private attribute @!items is declared, with a lexical
alias @items (without any twigil).
This could become a FAQ entry...
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://perlgeek.de/ | http://perl-6.de/ | http://sudokugarden.de/
.
Or is your question much more complicated than that, and I am simply to
dumb to grasp it?
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://perlgeek.de/ | http://perl-6.de/ | http://sudokugarden.de/
functions, and need to be specced as such.
Ah, that answers my previous question already ;-)
# .match, .subst and .trans from S05.
Now in S32/Str.pod. But I wasn't sure what subst() returns.
The modified string. (It doesn't do in-place substitution by default).
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz
for a student.
3) documentation
Also feel free to discuss these topics on IRC with us.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://perlgeek.de/ | http://perl-6.de/ | http://sudokugarden.de/
--
Moritz Lenz
http://perlgeek.de/ | http://perl-6.de/ | http://sudokugarden.de/
Currently the spec says:
Cmap returns a lazily evaluated list which is comprised of
the return value of the expression, evaluated once for every
one of the C@values that are passed in.
But both pugs and rakudo respect the arity of the code ref passed to it,
so that (1..6).map({$^a + $^b +
Hi,
Cory Spencer wrote:
In the spectest suite (specifically in: t/spec/S32-array/kv.t), the last
several tests seem to be testing for named arguments to kv:
# check the non-invocant form with named arguments
my @array = a b c d;
my @kv = kv(:array(@array));
#?rakudo
pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
Author: masak
Date: 2009-03-14 13:34:42 +0100 (Sat, 14 Mar 2009)
New Revision: 25821
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S12-objects.pod
Log:
specced syntactic 'where' sugar in param lists
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S12-objects.pod
pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-03-19 01:43:53 +0100 (Thu, 19 Mar 2009)
New Revision: 25902
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S05-regex.pod
Log:
[S05] define .caps and .chunks methods on match objects
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S05-regex.pod
Ruud H.G. van Tol wrote:
I wonder if there is place for a decision operator.
(search terms: FPGA, evolvable hardware, Xilinx, PLB, LUT, NESW)
dop:| 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F
+
0 0 | 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
0 1 | 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1
Moritz Lenz wrote:
Ruud H.G. van Tol wrote:
I wonder if there is place for a decision operator.
(search terms: FPGA, evolvable hardware, Xilinx, PLB, LUT, NESW)
dop:| 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F
+
0 0 | 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
0 1 | 0 0 0
Leon Timmermans wrote:
I would propose there to be one difference between for an map: map
should bind its arguments read-only, for should bind them read-write.
That would make at least one bad practice an error.
That sounds very impractical, because the ro/rw distinction is part of
the
Leon Timmermans wrote:
I would propose there to be one difference between for an map: map
should bind its arguments read-only, for should bind them read-write.
That would make at least one bad practice an error.
That sounds very impractical, because the ro/rw distinction is part of
the
. The answer is that an any()
junction represents just what it says - a conjunction of *any* values,
not some of the any values. The example would perfectly work if there
was nothing to filter out. You'd need 'some-of-any' junction here, which
we don't support.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http
Since afaict this is not specced, I'll hand that over to p6l.
Eric Hodges (via RT) wrote:
use v6;
rule test {test};
test ~~ /test/;
say '$/.keys = ', $/.keys.perl;
say '%($/).keys = ', %($/).keys.perl;
# outputs
# $/.keys = []
# %($/).keys = [test]
Same could be said for .values
Jon Lang wrote:
I stand corrected. That said: with the eigenstates method now
private, it is now quite difficult to get a list of the eigenstates of
the above expression.
I thought about that a bit, and I think eigenstates are not hard to
extract (which somehow makes the privateness of
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On 2009 Mar 31, at 17:04, Moritz Lenz wrote:
We had a discussion on #perl6 tonight about how to implement want(),
and
basically came to no conclusion. Then I came up with the idea that any
lazy implementor will come up with: drop it from the language.
Hm
I can't comment on most of your questions, but the few that I can answer
are inline below...
Jon Lang wrote:
Yes, I know that there is no S08. I'm working on writing one,
++
* What types are you allowed to assign to an invocant?
Whatever the type constraint says. When you write
class Foo
Xiao Yafeng wrote:
1. Could I set multi-return type?like
sub test as (Int, Str) {...}
as is coercion - so to what would it coerce? Int or Str? How could the
compiler know? Or do you mean something like a tuple?
2. set is unordered collection of values， subset is new
Moritz Lenz wrote:
2. set is unordered collection of values， subset is new type. People are
apt to confuse the two concepts.
Note that people never write subset in their code, the write things like
sub f($x where { ... } ) and the where constructs the subset type. I
don' think that's
Hi,
Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
Hi all. Can we change %*OPTS to %*ARGH ?
You can, in any program you like (at least very nearly):
sub MAIN(*...@arga, *%ARGH) {
...
}
Cheers,
Moritz
Hi,
I've written a few tests for two things that I feel I don't really
understand,
traits and the `lift' statement prefix. You can find them in
t/spec/S14-traits/basic.t
t/spec/S04-statements/lift.t
I'd appreciate it if you could take a look at them and tell me if they
conform
to what the spec
Moritz Lenz wrote:
sub f (lift $a + $b);
I mean 'sub f() { lift $a + $b }', sorry.
Jon Lang wrote:
@@ -1836,6 +1836,12 @@
prototype objects, in which case stringification is not likely to
produce something of interest to non-gurus.)
+The C.^parents method by default returns a flattened list of all
+parents sorted in MRO (dispatch) order. Other options are:
+
+
Hi,
(sorry for yet another p6l email mentioning junctions; if they annoy you
just ignore this mail :-)
while reviewing some tests I found the each() comprehension in S02
that evaded my attention so far.
Do we really want to keep such a rather obscure syntactic
transformation? I find an explicit
Hi,
t/oo/value_types.t mentions the is value trait, which doesn't appear
in the spec anywhere. According to the discussion in [1] there was
speculation about 'is cow' and 'is value', but the former didn't seem to
enter the spec either.
So what should I do about that test? Simply delete it?
Hi,
I had the pleasure to implement the series operator (infix:...) in
Rakudo(*), and came across the difficulty to come up with a signature
for it. These are the use cases I want to cover:
1, 2 ... { $^a + $^b }
1 ... { $_ + 1 }
The first one can clearly be written as
sub infix:...(@values,
pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
Author: kyle
Date: 2009-07-04 19:26:48 +0200 (Sat, 04 Jul 2009)
New Revision: 27404
Modified:
t/syntax/hyper_latin1.t
Log:
[t] Further mutated t/syntax/hyper_latin1.t
Modified: t/syntax/hyper_latin1.t
Hi,
while writing some tests for the smartmatch operator, I noticed this item:
Any * block signature match block successfully binds to |$_
which block is this talking about? the current ?BLOCK? Somehow this
doesn't make much sense to me.
I also noticed that the slice
Hi,
Somehow the current file test syntax, 'filename' ~~ :e, looks like a not
well-though-out translation of Perl 5's syntax, -e 'filename'.
Apart from totally feeling wrong to me, there are a few points I can put
my finger on:
1) $file ~~ :s returns a number, although smartmatching usually
payload++ brought this up on #perl6:
in current Rakudo, $string ~~ /re/ sets $/ in the scope in which the
expression appears, ie
'a' ~~ /./;
say $/; # ouput: a
But $str.match(..) and $str.subst don't. The spec is rather silent, it
says There are also method forms of m// and s///: [...]
Hi,
I came to this
12:51 @moritz_ rakudo: my $x = 3; say $x, ' ', ++$x;
12:51 p6eval rakudo 7b81c0: OUTPUT«4 4»
12:51 @moritz_ rakudo: my $x = 3; say $x, ' ', $x++;
12:51 p6eval rakudo 7b81c0: OUTPUT«4 3»
This looks very counter intuitive, because it looks like the arguments
are evaluated
On behalf of the Rakudo development team, I'm pleased to announce
the July 2009 development release of Rakudo Perl #19 Chicago.
Rakudo is an implementation of Perl 6 on the Parrot Virtual Machine [1].
The tarball for the July 2009 release is available from
http://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/downloads
Richard Hainsworth wrote:
One of Masak's irritations with perl6
(http://use.perl.org/~masak/journal/39334) concerns interspacing POD and
code.
I ran into an analogous problem with a project I am trying to do with
perl6. Since perl6 doesnt yet link to the gd library, and I need
Mark J. Reed wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Moritz Lenzmor...@faui2k3.org wrote:
Presumably you want here-docs, which can be indented in Perl 6:
perl 6 code
perl 6 code
$script.say(Q:toEND);
output code
output code
END
The leading whitespace
Ben Morrow wrote:
I'm iworking on a patch for Perl 5 that implements the Perl 6 closure
traits (ENTER/LEAVE/...) as special blocks. There are several details
that aren't clear to me from either S04 or the spec tests; I apologize
if these have been discussed before, as I haven't been following
Ben Morrow wrote:
Moritz Lenz wrote:
Ben Morrow wrote:
- Presumably when an exception is thrown through a block, the LEAVE and
POST queues are called (in that order).
POST was inspired from the Design By Contract department, and are meant
to execute assertions on the result. If you
I'm in the mood to question my sanity, so I'm seeking feedback for some
test mangling:
In t/spec/S03-operators/assign.t there are some tests that cause me a
headache. I'm trying to re-write them to not use the now-gone want()
function, but I'd have to understand them first ;-)
A good example is
Thanks for the quick reply.
Larry Wall wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 09:24:40PM +0200, Moritz Lenz wrote:
: sub W () { substr(eval('want'), 0, 1) }
: ...
:
: # line 560:
: {
: my @a;
: my @z = (@a[0] = W, W);
: #?rakudo 2 todo 'want function'
: is(@a, 'L','lhs
Jon Lang wrote:
Larry Wall wrote:
Moritz Lenz wrote:
: Either it's parsed as '@a[0] = (W, W)' (list assignment), then @a should
: get both elements, and so should @z.
Not according to S03, at least by one reading. @a[0] as a scalar
container only wants one item, so it only takes the first
Let's pick up this old mail before it gets completely warnocked ;-)
For the record, this discussion only applies to scalar implementation
types. For example for Arrays I expect things to work by overriding the
method postcircumfix:[ ].
Also I'm far from being an expert on this field, so feel
pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
Author: jimmy
Date: 2009-08-07 05:02:42 +0200 (Fri, 07 Aug 2009)
New Revision: 27888
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S01-overview.pod
docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
docs/Perl6/Spec/S04-control.pod
t/spec/S02-builtin_data_types/unicode.t has tests like this:
# LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A, COMBINING GRAVE ACCENT
my Str $u = \x[0041,0300];
is $u.bytes, 3, 'combining À is three bytes as utf8';
is $u.codes, 2, 'combining À is two codes';
is $u.graphs, 1, 'combining À is one graph';
Which seems to
Ben Morrow wrote:
Quoth markjr...@gmail.com (Mark J. Reed):
I still like the double-bracket idea. I don't much mind the extra
character; 5 characters total still beats the 7 of HTML/XML.
I much prefer double-bracket to double-#: double-# gets caught out when
you do s/^/# on code which
Damian Conway wrote:
It's not yet committed, as there will (no doubt) be much discussion
first. I apologize in advance: I am still travelling on my annual world
tour, so my ability to participate in this discussion will be limited
and erratic.
In the spirit of ask for forgiveness rather than
raiph mellor wrote:
However it seems we have to pay a price: each act of rendering a Pod
file actually means executing the program that's being documented (at
least the BEGIN blocks and other stuff that happens at compile time),
with all the security risks implied. So we'll need a *very* good
Kevan Benson wrote:
Should there not be a way to define object constructors with custom
signatures that can be usefully invoked like a normal constructor?
Currently, defining a BUILD method for a class with a specific signature
doesn't seem to allow for the object to be invoked by new with
Darren Duncan wrote:
In regards to http://perlcabal.org/syn/S11.html#Versioning I have recently
considered that it may be deficient in addressing a possibly-common
situation,
and I'm looking for input on how to handle that situation, either for a best
practice that works within the
Kevan Benson wrote:
That said, I submit that it's a very confusing part of the language as
defined currently, and I haven't seen a very thorough explanation of the
purpose of each method in the chain the instantiates a new object. S12
touches upon them slightly, but not in enough detail
yary wrote:
[ a lot of good things that make lot of sense ]
Your complaints and review by TimToady and pmichaud on #perl6 convinced
me that this is not a good idea after all, see
http://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2009-09-07#i_1475421
Cheers,
Moritz
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:15:05PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
page 73 - Perl 6 implementations
I've added Mildew, with links, to the SMOP line
anything I should add / change / remove?
What's the status of KindaPerl6?
I think it's stalled or
Carl Mäsak wrote:
Tim ():
Anything else I should add, change or remove? I'm especially interested
in verifyable metrics showing effort, progress, or use. Ideally graphical.
Any interesting nuggets that fit with the theme will be most welcome.
Moritz++ and I were talking about making a graph
(Sorry if this gets a bit lengthy and hijacks the current thread, but
there are some thoughts I want to share about perl6.org, and Patrick
handed me the opportunity on a silver plate here ;-)
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:16:56AM -0500, Kyle Hasselbacher wrote:
On Mon,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 09:30:13AM +0530, Saravanan Thiyagarajan wrote:
Would like to be a volunteer in working for perl-6.
Can some one help me to get into right direction ?
I've written about various options on perlmonks [1], but I think the best
thing you can do right now is to pick a simple
Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Carl Mäsak wrote:
Tim (), Raphael ():
Some XML related stuff:
XML parser:
http://github.com/fperrad/xml/
Tree manipulation:
http://github.com/wayland/Tree/tree/master
Thanks. Any reason they're not known to proto?
The latter I wasn't
Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 19:49 +1000, Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
+1. I have a set of 7 bookmarks that load in tabs that I call my Perl 6
bookmarks. I load this group of tabs into a separate web browser window
when
I'm
Aaron Sherman wrote:
Redirecting thread to language because I do agree that this is no longer a
matter of a bug.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Moritz Lenz via RT
perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org wrote:
On Thu Sep 17 08:53:59 2009, ajs wrote:
This code behaves as expected, matching 2
Moritz Lenz wrote:
In other words, we need to scale.
Please check perl6.org again, mostly the scaling is done now.
Cheers,
Moritz
Moritz Lenz wrote:
Carl Mäsak wrote:
Tim ():
Anything else I should add, change or remove? I'm especially interested
in verifyable metrics showing effort, progress, or use. Ideally graphical.
Any interesting nuggets that fit with the theme will be most welcome.
Moritz++ and I were talking
Consider this case:
class A { method m { say 'OH HAI' } };
my $m = A.new.^methods(:local).[0];
How should I invoke $m?
In current Rakudo this works:
$m(A.new); # supply the invocant as first argument
But shouldn't be just $m() (invocant magically curried) or may
$m(A.new:) (invocant not
Jon Lang wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:58 PM, pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
Author: moritz
Date: 2009-10-01 08:58:00 +0200 (Thu, 01 Oct 2009)
New Revision: 28523
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Numeric.pod
Log:
[S32::Num] More thoughts on Inf/NaN Complex, and
Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Moritz Lenz mor...@faui2k3.org wrote:
What's the 0th root of a number, then?
It would be a number $y for which $y ** 0 == $x, which can only be
fulfilled for $x == 1. So in the general cases the answer to the
question root($x, 0
Jon Lang wrote:
How do pred and succ work when given Complex values?
By adding/substracting 1 from the real part, I'd say. Don't know if that
actually makes sense.
More generally: if Complex does Numeric, then Numeric doesn't include
Ordered (or whatever it's called), because Complex doesn't
Michael Zedeler wrote:
Moritz Lenz wrote:
Jon Lang wrote:
How do pred and succ work when given Complex values?
By adding/substracting 1 from the real part, I'd say. Don't know if that
actually makes sense.
It doesn't, because succ should always give the next, smallest possible
Jon Lang wrote:
Moritz Lenz wrote:
Jon Lang wrote:
typos: s[Nuermic] = Numeric
You do have a pugs commit bit, don't you?
A what? AFAICT, I don't have any way of editing the Synopses;
You have now (sorry for assuming earlier that you had). A username and
password should be on the way
Darren Duncan wrote:
However, I still don't see how one would retrieve the distinction between say
1..10 and 1^..^10. I suggest that an extra 2 methods such as
.min_is_outside and .max_is_outside (each returns a Bool) could fit the bill,
and in fact since I have Pugs write access I think
Aaron Sherman wrote:
One of the first things that's becoming obvious to me in playing with
Rakudo's rules is that parsing strings isn't always what I'm going to
want to do. The most common example of wanting to parse data that's
not in string form is the YACC scenario where you want to have a
Hi all,
I've written down some notes on Longest-Token Matching, nothing really new,
just an attempt to be a bit more verbose than the spec:
http://github.com/moritz/ltm/blob/master/ltm.pod
If you find anything that's unclear or wrong, please let me know. If the
feedback is positive I'll merge
Hi,
the current spec doesn't allow immutable containers to call .map with a
block that implicitly uses $_ as an implicit parameter.
Here's why:
S06 says
The C$_ variable functions as a placeholder in a block without any
other placeholders or signature. Any bare block without placeholders
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 10:16:39AM -0500, Solomon Foster wrote:
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Moritz Lenz mor...@faui2k3.org wrote:
Hi,
the current spec doesn't allow immutable containers to call .map with a
block that implicitly uses $_ as an implicit parameter.
Here's why:
S06
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:33:35AM -0800, Darren Duncan wrote:
Acknowledging that 'FatRat' is current name for above 'Ratio' ...
pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
-For applications that really need arbitrary precision denominators
-as well as numerators, CRatio may be used, which is
in
the denominator.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://perlgeek.de/ | http://perl-6.de/ | http://sudokugarden.de/
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:56:46AM -0700, Sean Hunt wrote:
I'm looking forward to Perl 6, and I'm looking into the spec right now,
since that to me is the important bit of a language (I know, I'm
bizarre). I see at http://feather.perl6.nl/syn/ that a lot of the
language spec is
Dave Whipp wrote:
The definition of the Complex type seems a little weak. A few things:
To get the Cartesian components of the value there are two methods (re
and im). In contrast there is just one method polar to return the
polar components of the value
Not quite, .abs returns one of the
Darren Duncan wrote:
I was studying the synopsis today for how Perl 6 uses infinities, and among
the
48 occurrences of [|-|+]Inf in the synopsis, I noticed that in some places
you
seemed to use +Inf to mean positive infinity and other places you just say
Inf.
So are there just 2
pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
Author: ash
Date: 2010-01-19 17:34:28 +0100 (Tue, 19 Jan 2010)
New Revision: 29558
Added:
t/spec/S32-array/create.t
t/spec/S32-list/create.t
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
Log:
Adding some tests for List.new,
Carl Mäsak wrote:
But on another level, the level of types, Perl 6 makes it fairly
*un*natural that the type CFoo refers to the type CBar, which in
turn refers to the type CFoo.
True, and that has also been bothering me quite a bit.
The solution is to always write ::Typename instead of
solution is to get rid of the sub form of max() entirely.
Any objections?
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://perlgeek.de/ | http://perl-6.de/ | http://sudokugarden.de/
--
Moritz Lenz
http://perlgeek.de/ | http://perl-6.de/ | http://sudokugarden.de/
$t anywhere, there's no reason to give
it a name, so you can write this actually as
multi traverse (Tree $ ( $left, $right) ) {
traverse($left);
traverse($right);
}
Hope that helps,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://perlgeek.de/ | http://perl-6.de/ | http://sudokugarden.de/
Mark J. Reed wrote:
Oh, wow. I was just asking about the spec; didn't know this stuff
already worked. Rakudos to the team! :)
Actually there's quite much that works in Rakudo, even if some corner
cases are missing or error messages might benefit from more verbosity.
Especially in the area of
Hi,
Hongwen Qiu wrote:
Hi, I'm new to Perl6. And just ran the first example in the perl6 book.
But, it refused to work. It complains as follows:
Too many positional parameters passed; got 2 but expected between 0 and 1
I find out that the problem is in the line:
my @sorted =
Carl Mäsak wrote:
masak um, so 'protected' is when the deriving classes can see the attribute?
jonalv yup
masak that's what 'private' means in Perl 6.
That's wrong. Perl 6's private is like Java's private - subclasses
can't see it.
It's just Rakudo being leaky at the moment, not a fallacy of
Carl Mäsak wrote:
Carl (), Moritz ():
masak um, so 'protected' is when the deriving classes can see the
attribute?
jonalv yup
masak that's what 'private' means in Perl 6.
That's wrong. Perl 6's private is like Java's private - subclasses
can't see it.
It's just Rakudo being leaky at
101 - 200 of 323 matches
Mail list logo
