Author: masak
Date: 2010-06-02 12:10:22 +0200 (Wed, 02 Jun 2010)
New Revision: 31043
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
Log:
[S32/Containers] Buf does Stringy, too
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
Author: masak
Date: 2010-06-02 12:10:26 +0200 (Wed, 02 Jun 2010)
New Revision: 31044
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
Log:
[S32/Containers] Buf.new parameter no longer slurpy
Feedback from implementors suggests that this would be too inefficient.
Also, might be
Author: masak
Date: 2010-06-02 12:11:42 +0200 (Wed, 02 Jun 2010)
New Revision: 31045
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
Log:
[S32/Containers] oh, and let's bump the version, too
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
Author: lwall
Date: 2010-06-02 18:51:06 +0200 (Wed, 02 Jun 2010)
New Revision: 31050
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
Log:
[S03] refine hyper dwimminess to be more like APL, with modular semantics
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl writes:
Author: lwall
Log:
[S03] refine hyper dwimminess to be more like APL, with modular semantics
+(1,2,3) »+» 1 # 2,4,4,6 rhs dwims to (1 xx *).batch(3)
I'd've expected the output to be 2,3,4; is the 2,4,4,6 copy pasta or am
I missing
Author: lwall
Date: 2010-06-02 19:30:34 +0200 (Wed, 02 Jun 2010)
New Revision: 31051
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
Log:
[S02] refine Blobs to simply be immutable Bufs, with similar generic
characteristics
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
Author: lwall
Date: 2010-06-02 19:30:34 +0200 (Wed, 02 Jun 2010)
New Revision: 31051
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
Log:
[S02] refine Blobs to simply be immutable Bufs, with similar generic
characteristics
snip
Thank you for this change; it was
Author: lwall
Date: 2010-06-02 20:02:31 +0200 (Wed, 02 Jun 2010)
New Revision: 31053
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
Log:
[S03] copy-o spotted by Smylers++
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
===
---
Smylers wrote:
pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl writes:
Author: lwall
Log:
[S03] refine hyper dwimminess to be more like APL, with modular semantics
+ (1,2,3) »+» 1 # 2,4,4,6 rhs dwims to (1 xx *).batch(3)
I'd've expected the output to be 2,3,4; is the 2,4,4,6 copy pasta or am
Author: lwall
Date: 2010-06-02 20:19:54 +0200 (Wed, 02 Jun 2010)
New Revision: 31054
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
Log:
[S03] suggestions from dataweaver++
more refinements to the description of the dwim semantics
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
+Regardless of whether the dwim is forced or emergent from the shapes
+of the arrays, once the side to dwim on has been chosen, the dwim
+semantics on the dwimmy side are always:
+
+ (@dwimmyside xx *).batch(@otherside.elems)
+
+This produces a list
And while we're at it with expanding examples, can we use string
concatenation instead of addition? It makes following what's happening
easier.
eg, +1 on that prior post.
-y
Darren Duncan wrote:
With the above addition, you have both Buf and Blob roles as well as Buf and
Blob types.
I think you need to make each of those just a role or a type, and then add
another named entity which is the counterpart role or type.
For example, as you have Stringy as a role
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 5:10 AM, pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
Author: masak
Date: 2010-06-02 12:10:22 +0200 (Wed, 02 Jun 2010)
New Revision: 31043
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
Log:
[S32/Containers] Buf does Stringy, too
-class Buf does
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 12:51 PM, pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
+
+(1,2,3,4) »+« (1,2) # always error
+(1,2,3,4) «+» (1,2) # 2,4,4,6 rhs dwims to ((1,2) xx *).batch(4)
+(1,2,3) «+» (1,2) # 2,4,4 rhs dwims to ((1,2) xx *).batch(3)
+(1,2,3,4) «+« (1,2)
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Jason Switzer jswit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 5:10 AM, pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
-class Buf does Positional {...}
+class Buf does Positional does Stringy {...}
I never really thought about this, but now that I see it
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Aaron Sherman a...@ajs.com wrote:
Is there some automatic translation of these examples into tests? If not,
here's what they'd be:
ok(( (1,2,3,4) «+» (1,2) ) ~~ (2,4,4,6) )
ok(( (1,2,3) «+» (1,2) ) ~~ (2,4,4) )
ok(( (1,2,3,4) «+« (1,2) ) ~~ (2,4) )
Solomon Foster wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Aaron Sherman a...@ajs.com wrote:
Is there some automatic translation of these examples into tests? If not,
here's what they'd be:
ok(( (1,2,3,4) «+» (1,2) ) ~~ (2,4,4,6) )
ok(( (1,2,3) «+» (1,2) ) ~~ (2,4,4) )
ok(( (1,2,3,4) «+«
Jason Switzer wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 5:10 AM, pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
Author: masak
Date: 2010-06-02 12:10:22 +0200 (Wed, 02 Jun 2010)
New Revision: 31043
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
Log:
[S32/Containers] Buf does Stringy, too
-
19 matches
Mail list logo
