David == David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But don't throw out the simplicity of CGI.pm's basic task handling: parsing
the incoming parameters (including file upload), and generating sticky forms
and other common HTML elements.
David That's two tasks. It should be two modules.
No,
(Randal L. Schwartz) schrieb:
David == David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David That's two tasks. It should be two modules.
No, it's an *integrated* task. The form-generation stuff needs tight
coupling
with the getting (and setting) of the incoming param values.
A separate module,
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
David == David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But don't throw out the simplicity of CGI.pm's basic task handling: parsing
the incoming parameters (including file upload), and generating sticky forms
and other common HTML elements.
David
Juerd wrote:
It does make sense to have a single toolkit that does all this. It does
not make sense to have a single .pm that does all this. There's
absolutely no need for having all these different tasks in one module.
There's not even any benefit. You can just as well use a couple of
* Randal L. Schwartz merlyn@stonehenge.com [2006-09-19 21:25]:
The form-generation stuff needs tight coupling with the getting
(and setting) of the incoming param values. You couldn't just
use two random modules for that... they'd have to specifically
know about each other and work together.
