RE: redirecting to different networks

2006-03-21 Thread Steven S
Gustavo A. Baratto wrote: .. FW2 is ready, and the IP for DNS2 is already assigned... So, while DNS2 server is not ready, is it possible to setup FW2, so DNS queries from the external world can be redirected to DNS1? It would be basically an rdr reflection on the external interface,

RE: PF load balancing

2006-02-13 Thread Steven S
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all : We've a firewall with 4 interfaces (2 outside to two differents routers and ISP,1 inside and 1 DMZ),the machine is running a Squid web proxy too, we wanna make balancing on outgoing connections only for the web traffic, we have get to do that, and now the

RE: CARP and preempt buggy with wrong switches? Or carp bug?

2006-02-02 Thread Steven S
Right. When preempt is set any carp interface which has a real interface down causes all carps to use 240 for the skew. At this point I think it is simply a race to see which interface takes MASTER. That is why I used preempt on only one FW. This insures that, in a situation like the one

RE: CARP and preempt buggy with wrong switches? Or carp bug?

2006-02-02 Thread Steven S
As I understand it, preempt is all or nothing. So if I have FW's configured like, ISP switch / \ | | FW1-- DMZ --FW2 [That's one DMZ switch] | switch | \ / LAN switch If I wish FW1 to be primary and FW2 to be secondary I set advskew on FW1 to be

RE: CARP and preempt buggy with wrong switches? Or carp bug?

2006-02-01 Thread Steven S
I had a similar issue. I ended up using net.inet.carp.preempt=1 on the primary firewall and net.inet.carp.preempt=0 on the secondary. If the primary has an issue, the secondary becomes the master on all interfaces. I must confess I haven't fully tested the configuration. -Steve S. [EMAIL

Carp address !as source IP

2004-09-16 Thread Steven S.
Greetings, I'm experiencing an interesting problem and I'm googled out. Trying to get mail from a firewall which is the carp master to an internally hosted e-mail server. The mail server is using a private IP address and the firewall is using a binat rule to translate a public carp IP to the

RE: Carp address !as source IP

2004-09-16 Thread Steven S.
Jason Opperisano wrote: On Thu, 2004-09-16 at 08:58, Steven S. wrote: the above seems to be the result of a blocked packet with set block-policy return or a block return ... rule ...SYN goes out but SYN-ACK coming back in gets a RST... I have no such policies. It is my understanding