am Tue, dem 28.08.2007, um 10:56:38 +0530 mailte Ashish Karalkar folgendes:
Hello all,
I have a database abc with owner c .
I want to grant only read access on this DB abc to user d.
More specificaly to a schema abcs in the databse abc.
Is ther any way to do so?
I have more than
Hello,
My DB crashed without any recent backup.
I only have old DB files.
How can i use WAL files and restore_command to restore ?
Thanks
Franck R.
Hello,
My DB crashed without any recent backup.
I have old DB files.
Can i use base folder files to restore ?
Thanks
Franck R.
Adrian Klaver wrote:
I have a question. First a little history. Right now, the people who know
better than I are fairly certain Postgres is not changing things on its own
and the developer is certain the CMS software is not doing schema changes. As
I understand it logging has been cranked up
Tom Lane wrote:
Erik Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also, I'd write a simple ping script to check for the table that
runs every 5 seconds or so.
I had gathered that the table was being touched constantly by his app,
so that it'd be immediately obvious when it had gone away. If
Franck Roubieu - AXCENTEO wrote:
Hello,
My DB crashed without any recent backup.
What happened to cause it to crash?
I have old DB files.
Can i use base folder files to restore ?
Yes, but it's only reliable if the file-backup was taken while the
database wasn't running.
I'm assuming
Ow Mun Heng wrote:
Continuining with my efforts to get similar functionality as mysql's
mysqlimport --replace I want to ask for the list's opinion on which is
better
I would suggest #3
3. \copy to temp_table, do
-- update main_table set value=t2.value from temp_table t2 where
main_table.pkey
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Adrian Klaver wrote:
I have a question. First a little history. Right now, the people who know
better than I are fairly certain Postgres is not changing things on its own
and the developer is certain the CMS software is not doing schema changes. As
I understand it
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 08:19 +0100, Richard Huxton wrote:
Ow Mun Heng wrote:
Continuining with my efforts to get similar functionality as mysql's
mysqlimport --replace I want to ask for the list's opinion on which is
better
I would suggest #3
3.\copy ; update ; insert
Don't forget
John K Masters wrote:
However, on looking at the U of K
page that has come up I see in the top left hand corner the words This
page does not exist.
You're right - there's something wrong there. I'll pass this on to the
website team.
As a quick solution, choose browse the download mirrors
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 05:58:26PM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 11:44:38PM +0200, Kamil Srot wrote:
When this problem appeared for the first time, I had clearly the
wraparound problem... I did vacuum it and partially restored the data...
I don't think vacuum
John K Masters wrote:
I have setup a Postgres server on Debian Etch and successfully connected
to it with various *nix clients but I now have to connect a WinXP
client. On accessing the Postgres site I am directed to a download page,
click on the appropriate link and get automatically directed
Dawid Kuroczko wrote:
[...] and it also would be valuable to
add into pg_service.conf.sample an example ldap:// stanza, so if
person opens the file, she will be enlightened.
I like that idea.
And a missing feature. Or rather treat it as feature request. :-)
A wildcard entry. I would like
Kamil Srot wrote:
In the version used on this particular server, there is no
automatic/programing way of changing
the schema. Upgrades are done manually and application itself doesn't
need schema changes
for routine operations...
In that case, you can settle the matter by making sure your
Ow Mun Heng wrote:
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 08:19 +0100, Richard Huxton wrote:
Ow Mun Heng wrote:
Continuining with my efforts to get similar functionality as mysql's
mysqlimport --replace I want to ask for the list's opinion on which is
better
I would suggest #3
3.\copy ; update ; insert
Richard Huxton wrote:
Kamil Srot wrote:
In the version used on this particular server, there is no
automatic/programing way of changing
the schema. Upgrades are done manually and application itself doesn't
need schema changes
for routine operations...
In that case, you can settle the matter
the SQL Server 2005 Express download provides software that
is suitable for application embedding or lightweight application
development.
I never developed more then some queries on SQL Server Express or its
different names.
But I had to work with some applications which used the
Harald Armin Massa wrote:
the SQL Server 2005 Express download provides software that
is suitable for application embedding or lightweight application
development.
I never developed more then some queries on SQL Server Express or its
different names.
But I had to work
I'm hoping to get some advice on a design question I'm grappling with.
I have a database now that in many respects may be regarded as an
collection of a few hundred much smaller parallel databases, all
having the same schema. What I mean by this is that, as far as the
intended use of this
Kynn Jones wrote:
I'm hoping to get some advice on a design question I'm grappling with.
I have a database now that in many respects may be regarded as an
collection of a few hundred much smaller parallel databases, all
having the same schema. What I mean by this is that, as far as the
INSERT INTO table [ ( column [, ...] ) ]
{ DEFAULT VALUES | VALUES ( { expression | DEFAULT } [, ...] )
[, ...] | query }
[ RETURNING * | output_expression [ AS output_name ] [, ...] ]
but it seems if i want to return the result into a record i have to
use it with INTO clause in the
am Tue, dem 28.08.2007, um 8:08:36 -0400 mailte Kynn Jones folgendes:
I'm hoping to get some advice on a design question I'm grappling with.
I have a database now that in many respects may be regarded as an
collection of a few hundred much smaller parallel databases, all
having the same
I am curious if there are any rules of thumb for when to index a
foreign key column? I was under the impression that it was always a
good idea to do this based on the fact that you typically join
through a foreign key but after reading the docs I'm not so sure it's
necessary or provides any
Hi,
Bill Moran wrote:
First off, clustering is a word that is too vague to be useful, so
I'll stop using it. There's multi-master replication, where every
database is read-write, then there's master-slave replication, where
only one server is read-write and the rest are read-only. You can
add
am Tue, dem 28.08.2007, um 14:23:00 +0200 mailte Kamil Srot folgendes:
Kynn Jones wrote:
I'm hoping to get some advice on a design question I'm grappling with.
I have a database now that in many respects may be regarded as an
collection of a few hundred much smaller parallel databases, all
On Tuesday 28 August 2007 06:32:32 A. Kretschmer wrote:
am Tue, dem 28.08.2007, um 14:23:00 +0200 mailte Kamil Srot folgendes:
Kynn Jones wrote:
I'm hoping to get some advice on a design question I'm grappling with.
I have a database now that in many respects may be regarded as an
Hello list,
Is there any difference between a PGSQL Function and Stored Procedure in
PostgreSQL (8.2) ?
If so, what difference? Is the SQL used to create a SP different from the
SQL used to create a function ?
Thanks in advance,
Marcelo.
On Aug 28, 2007, at 3:10 , Richard Huxton wrote:
Ow Mun Heng wrote:
less typing per insert/update statement so it'll be where a.pkey =
b.pkey instead of a.key1 = b.key1 and a.key2 = b.key2
and ... up to key5
I'd still leave it alone, but it's your database.
And you can use the row
Kristo Kaiv wrote:
INSERT INTO table [ ( column [, ...] ) ]
{ DEFAULT VALUES | VALUES ( { expression | DEFAULT } [, ...] ) [, ...]
| query }
[ RETURNING * | output_expression [ AS output_name ] [, ...] ]
but it seems if i want to return the result into a record i have to use it
On Aug 28, 2007, at 8:24 , Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote:
Is there any difference between a PGSQL Function and Stored
Procedure in
PostgreSQL (8.2) ?
No.
Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain
At 7:05 PM -0400 8/27/07, Tom Lane wrote:
Owen Hartnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I assign the transaction object to each of the commands, but it seems
that some tables will get updated, even when I call rollback. Is
something I'm calling secretly calling commit somewhere?
Dunno anything
In response to Markus Schiltknecht [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Bill Moran wrote:
First off, clustering is a word that is too vague to be useful, so
I'll stop using it. There's multi-master replication, where every
database is read-write, then there's master-slave replication, where
only
After reading several articles on the performance drag that Linux atime
has on file systems we would like to mount our DB volumes with the
noatime parameter to see just what type of a performance gain we will
achieve. Does PostgreSQL use atime in any way when reading/writing
data? If we turn
On 8/28/07, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list,
Is there any difference between a PGSQL Function and Stored Procedure in
PostgreSQL (8.2) ?
If so, what difference? Is the SQL used to create a SP different from the
SQL used to create a function ?
Strictly speaking,
At 11:48 PM 8/27/2007, Trevor Talbot wrote:
On 8/27/07, Jonah H. Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/27/07, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that and the lack of evidence that they'd actually gain anything
I find it somewhat ironic that PostgreSQL strives to be fairly
non-corruptable,
Kamil Srot wrote:
Heh, is the pool still open? Maybe I can make at least something from
it :-D
Current odds
Application bug: even money
Application configuration issue: 2-1
Rogue cron job or other maintenance process: 4-1
Somebody messing with you (or SQL injection): 8-1
XID
On Aug 28, 2007, at 9:41 AM, Kamil Srot wrote:
Jeff Amiel wrote:
My entire shop has set up a betting pool on the outcome of
this...so I hope you post results regardless of the outcome, Kamil.
Heh, is the pool still open? Maybe I can make at least something
from it :-D
(in all seriousness,
My entire shop has set up a betting pool on the outcome of this...so I
hope you post results regardless of the outcome, Kamil.
(in all seriousness, we hope you find/fix the problem before things get
really ugly)
Kamil Srot wrote:
Richard Huxton wrote:
Kamil Srot wrote:
In the version used
Jeff Amiel wrote:
My entire shop has set up a betting pool on the outcome of this...so I
hope you post results regardless of the outcome, Kamil.
Heh, is the pool still open? Maybe I can make at least something from it :-D
(in all seriousness, we hope you find/fix the problem before things
Thank you very much for your replies. Given the differences in the
opinions expressed, I thought I would describe the database briefly.
The purpose of the database is basically translation of terms.
Imagine a collection of disjoint sets A, B, C, ...
Now imagine that for each element of a set
At 03:15 PM 8/28/2007, Kamil Srot wrote:
Andrew, Alvaro... well, sure SQL injection is possibility I cannot
ignore... (and sure as dad of this
application, I think it's not the case :-) ... just kidding...
As even the injected SQL will be shown in the logs, so we'll know
more after some time.
Kynn Jones wrote:
I'm hoping to get some advice on a design question I'm grappling with.
I have a database now that in many respects may be regarded as an
collection of a few hundred much smaller parallel databases, all
having the same schema. What I mean by this is that, as far as the
I need a way to perform a series of money transactions (row inserts)
together with some row updates in such a way that integrity is ensured
and performance is high.
I have two tables:
ACCOUNTS (
account_id int,
balance int
);
TRANSACTIONS (
transaction_id int,
This seems unnecessarily complicated.
Yes, I believe you do have to grant select on every table, but you can
use psql to generate the queries, then execute them.
i.e.
-- show only tuples
/t
-- output to temp script file.
/o script.sql
-- generate your script using pg_tables
SELECT 'GRANT
We have upgraded from Version 7.4.x to Version 8.2.4.
In 7.4.x, we use the Informix compatibility functionality to use legacy
code.
Our .pgc code looks as follows:
#include Ice.h
EXEC SQL include sqlda;
EXEC SQL include sqltypes;
EXEC SQL include sql3types;
EXEC SQL include
Hi,
Bill Moran wrote:
While true, I feel those applications are the exception, not the rule.
Most DBs these days are the blogs and the image galleries, etc. And
those don't need or want the overhead associated with synchronous
replication.
Uhm.. do blogs and image galleries need replication
Split page algorithm was rewrited for 8.2 for multicolumn indexes and API for
user-defined pickSplit function was extended to has better results with index
creation. But GiST can interact with old functions - and it says about this.
That isn't mean some real problem or error - index will be the
Hi all,
I fully acknowledge that this may be off topic, but hopefully not too
much. :) I am hoping some of you have used PgSQL this way and can help
as I am not on any courier mail lists.
I have a problem I can't seem to figure out. I am trying to get
Courier to read email over POP3
George Pavlov wrote:
What's the plan for releasing the next 8.1? There hasn't been a release
since April and there have been fixes. (I personally am particularly
interested in implement chunking protocol for writes to the syslogger
pipe because without it over 2/3 of attempts at query analysis
What's the plan for releasing the next 8.1? There hasn't been a release
since April and there have been fixes. (I personally am particularly
interested in implement chunking protocol for writes to the syslogger
pipe because without it over 2/3 of attempts at query analysis fail for
me).
George
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kristo Kaiv wrote:
but it seems if i want to return the result into a record i have to use it
with INTO clause in the end:
Ah, you are using it in plpgsql! OK, but the explanation to the
discrepancy is that the second INTO is not part of the SQL
Josh Trutwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am curious if there are any rules of thumb for when to index a
foreign key column?
(You realize of course that there's already an index on the referenced
column, else you wouldn't have been allowed to reference it.)
You need an index on the referencing
Hello,
I have a question about whether I can safely declare a function IMMUTABLE.
Citing the PostgreSQL documentation under Function Volatility
Categories in the section on Extending SQL:
It is generally unwise to select from database tables within an
On 28/08/2007 15:48, Jeff Amiel wrote:
Alien or supernatural intervention: 18-1
Obscure postgresql bug nobody else has ever seen: 25-1
That's the sort of confidence in the DBMS we all like to see! :-)
Ray.
---
Raymond O'Donnell,
In response to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I have a question about whether I can safely declare a function IMMUTABLE.
Citing the PostgreSQL documentation under Function Volatility
Categories in the section on Extending SQL:
It is generally unwise
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, I am considering a function that does select from a table, but the
table contents change extremely infrequently (the table is practically a
list of constants). Would it be safe to declare the function IMMUTABLE
provided that the table itself is endowed with
George Pavlov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What's the plan for releasing the next 8.1?
It is on the radar screen, but core has been trying to focus on getting
8.3 ready for beta. Thankfully, we are starting to see some light at
the end of that tunnel ... maybe another couple weeks.
Keaton Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After reading several articles on the performance drag that Linux atime
has on file systems we would like to mount our DB volumes with the
noatime parameter to see just what type of a performance gain we will
achieve. Does PostgreSQL use atime in any way
Keaton Adams wrote:
After reading several articles on the performance drag that Linux atime
has on file systems we would like to mount our DB volumes with the
noatime parameter to see just what type of a performance gain we will
achieve. Does PostgreSQL use atime in any way when
In response to Keaton Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
After reading several articles on the performance drag that Linux atime
has on file systems we would like to mount our DB volumes with the
noatime parameter to see just what type of a performance gain we will
achieve. Does PostgreSQL use atime
We use noatime on our production database without issues.
On 8/28/07, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In response to Keaton Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
After reading several articles on the performance drag that Linux atime
has on file systems we would like to mount our DB volumes with the
In general, your handling of WAL files seems fragile and error-prone
Indeed. I would recommend simply using rsync to handle pushing the
files. I see several advantages:
1. Distributed load - you aren't copying a full-day of files all at once.
2. Very easy to set-up - you can use it
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:19:32 -0400
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josh Trutwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am curious if there are any rules of thumb for when to index a
foreign key column?
(You realize of course that there's already an index on the
referenced column, else you
Teodor Sigaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Split page algorithm was rewrited for 8.2 for multicolumn indexes and API for
user-defined pickSplit function was extended to has better results with index
creation. But GiST can interact with old functions - and it says about this.
That isn't mean
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, I am considering a function that does select from a table, but the
table contents change extremely infrequently (the table is practically a
list of constants). Would it be safe to declare the function IMMUTABLE
provided
Steve Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
4. Much more up-to-the-minute recovery data.
In your scenario, what about using cp -l (or ln) instead? Since the
hard-link it is only creating a new pointer, it will be very fast and
save a bunch of disk IO on your server and it doesn't appear that
Gregory Stark wrote:
In your scenario, what about using cp -l (or ln) instead?
Postgres tries to reuse WAL files. Once the archive_command completes it
believes it is safe to reuse the old file without deleting it. That will do
nasty things if you've used ln as your archive command.
Running 8.2.4.
The following is in my postgresql.conf:
# - Query/Index Statistics Collector -
#stats_command_string = on
update_process_title = on
stats_start_collector = on # needed for block or row stats
# (change requires restart)
Karl Denninger wrote:
A manual Vacuum full analyze fixes it immediately.
But... .shouldn't autovacuum prevent this? Is there some way to look in a
log somewhere and see if and when the autovacuum is being run - and on
what?
Are your FSM settings enough to keep track of the dead space you
Yes, thanx. This would be useful as some of our clients are getting
swamped (and confused) with these messages in the log files.
Cheers,
Kevin
Tom Lane wrote:
Teodor Sigaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Split page algorithm was rewrited for 8.2 for multicolumn indexes and API for
user-defined
I notice in the log entries for the out of memory events have no username,
database name or host
identifier (while regular logged events do) Does that mean anything to anybody?
Aug 28 08:25:50 db-1 postgres[29019]: [ID 748848 local0.warning] [111900-1]
2007-08-28
08:25:50.081 CDT
Jeff Amiel wrote:
I notice in the log entries for the out of memory events have no username,
database name or host
identifier (while regular logged events do) Does that mean anything to
anybody?
Aug 28 08:25:50 db-1 postgres[29019]: [ID 748848 local0.warning] [111900-1]
2007-08-28
Jeff Amiel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I notice in the log entries for the out of memory events have no username,
database name or host
identifier (while regular logged events do) Does that mean anything to
anybody?
Means they're coming from autovacuum, likely?
Autovacuum probably *should*
--- Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2.168.20.44 28785LOG: duration: 22606.146 ms execute unnamed: select
Interesting. What's your log_line_prefix? Does it have %q somewhere?
No, no %q...not quite sure what it means: stop here in non-session processes
I don't know. How do I check?
Karl Denninger ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.denninger.net
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Karl Denninger wrote:
A manual Vacuum full analyze fixes it immediately.
But... .shouldn't autovacuum prevent this? Is there some way to look in a
log somewhere and see
Karl Denninger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But... .shouldn't autovacuum prevent this? Is there some way to look in
a log somewhere and see if and when the autovacuum is being run - and on
what?
There's no log messages (at the default log verbosity anyway). But you
could look into the pg_stat
Karl Denninger wrote:
Are your FSM settings enough to keep track of the dead space you have?
I don't know. How do I check?
vacuum verbose;
Toward the bottom you will see something like:
...
1200 page slots are required to track all free space.
Current limits are: 453600 page slots, 1000
On Aug 28, 2007, at 3:55 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Jeff Amiel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I notice in the log entries for the out of memory events have no
username, database name or host
identifier (while regular logged events do) Does that mean
anything to anybody?
Means they're coming from
Tom Lane wrote:
Karl Denninger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But... .shouldn't autovacuum prevent this? Is there some way to look in
a log somewhere and see if and when the autovacuum is being run - and on
what?
There's no log messages (at the default log verbosity anyway). But you
Steve Crawford wrote:
Karl Denninger wrote:
Are your FSM settings enough to keep track of the dead space you have?
I don't know. How do I check?
vacuum verbose;
Toward the bottom you will see something like:
...
1200 page slots are required to track all free space.
Current
Hello,
We're at a crossroads here and it's time to upgrade boxes and
versions of PG.
This eMail query is about the first step.
Are there any recommendations on whether to install onto 32 vs 64 bit
Linux?
We're going to be using virtual machines.
Our application consists mostly of
On 8/24/07, Jeff Amiel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Over last 2 days, have spotted 10 Out of Memory
errors in postgres logs (never saw before with same
app/usage patterns on tuned hardware/postgres under
FreeBSD)
Aug 22 18:08:24 db-1 postgres[16452]: [ID 748848
local0.warning] [6-1] 2007-08-22
Hi all
I want to implement something like the following:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION AddDays
(TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE
, INT)
RETURNS TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE AS '
DECLARE
time ALIAS FOR $1;
days ALIAS FOR $2;
BEGIN
RETURN time+days*24*3600*''1
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 04:59:46PM -0400, Wei Weng wrote:
Hi all
I want to implement something like the following:
Well, you could always implement it as SQL instead (untested):
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION AddDays
(TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE
, INT)
RETURNS TIMESTAMP WITHOUT
Ben wrote:
My autovacuum daemon isn't running on 8.2.4, and I'm guessing it's because
I changed my unix socket directory in postgresql.conf. Is there a way I can
tell autovacuum which socket file to use, or which IP to connect to?
It doesn't use a socket. How do you know it's not running?
On Aug 28, 2007, at 15:59 , Wei Weng wrote:
I don't really like this implementation. Is there a more concise
way to do this?
create or replace function add_days(timestamp, int)
returns timestamp language sql as $body$
select $1 + $2 * interval '1 day'
$body$;
Note that interval '1 day' is
Wei Weng escreveu:
Hi all
I want to implement something like the following:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION AddDays
(TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE
, INT)
RETURNS TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE AS '
DECLARE
time ALIAS FOR $1;
days ALIAS FOR $2;
BEGIN
RETURN
Wei Weng wrote:
I want to implement something like the following:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION AddDays
You don't know how many seconds are in a day, so just add the days using
SQL.
RETURN time + (days || ' days')::INTERVAL;
You don't even need to make that a function, just do that
On 8/28/07, Wei Weng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a more concise way to do this?
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION
ADDDAYS (TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE, INT)
RETURNS TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME ZONE AS '
SELECT $1+($2 * ''1 DAY''::INTERVAL)
' LANGUAGE SQL;
---(end of
On Aug 28, 2007, at 16:51 , Michael Glaesemann wrote:
If you mean 24 hours (which you're getting with your 24 * 3600 *
interval '2 second'), you could do
Or, 24 * 3600 * interval '1 second', rather
Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net
---(end of
On Aug 28, 2007, at 16:55 , D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
RETURN time + (days || ' days')::INTERVAL;
It's bad practice to concatenate like this. Use time + days *
interval '1 day' and be done with it.
Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net
---(end of
Hm, I assumed it wasn't running because pg_stat_all_tables shows the last
vacuum from several weeks ago, and this is an active db. Also, I see no
vacuum activity in the logs. But show autovacuum does show it being
on
So if it is running after all, how can I track down why things aren't
On 8/28/07, Karl Denninger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am I correct in that this number will GROW over time? Or is what I see
right now (with everything running ok) all that the system
will ever need?
They will grow at first to accomodate your typical load of dead tuples
created between
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
On Aug 28, 2007, at 16:55 , D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
RETURN time + (days || ' days')::INTERVAL;
It's bad practice to concatenate like this. Use time + days * interval
'1 day' and be done with it.
Why? Is this functionality expected to break in the future or has
Marko Kreen escribió:
I've experienced something similar. The reason turned out to be
combination of overcommit=off, big maint_mem and several parallel
vacuums for fast-changing tables. Seems like VACUUM allocates
full maint_mem before start, whatever the actual size of the table.
Hmm.
Scott Marlowe wrote:
On 8/28/07, Karl Denninger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am I correct in that this number will GROW over time? Or is what I see
right now (with everything running ok) all that the system
will ever need?
They will grow at first to accomodate your typical load of
Erik Jones escribió:
On Aug 28, 2007, at 4:33 PM, Marko Kreen wrote:
I've experienced something similar. The reason turned out to be
combination of overcommit=off, big maint_mem and several parallel
vacuums for fast-changing tables. Seems like VACUUM allocates
full maint_mem before start,
Hi all,
I got a table with many columns of data which got an index on one of the
fields (Tsearch2 Gist).
I thought that maybe if I'll create a new table with 2 fields (primary key
reference to the previous table the index field from the previous table)
and made the index on the index field,
On Aug 28, 2007, at 17:22 , D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
On Aug 28, 2007, at 16:55 , D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
RETURN time + (days || ' days')::INTERVAL;
It's bad practice to concatenate like this. Use time + days *
interval '1 day' and be done with it.
Why? Is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/28/07 16:21, Ralph Smith wrote:
Hello,
We're at a crossroads here and it's time to upgrade boxes and versions
of PG.
This eMail query is about the first step.
Are there any recommendations on whether to install onto 32 vs 64 bit
Linux?
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
