On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Amber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all:
We are currently considering using PostgreSQL to host a read only
warehouse, we would like to get some experiences, best practices and
performance metrics from the user community, following is the question list:
Hi,everybody!
I wish to have a function with code above, but compiller generate
syntactic error at the line SET SESSION ROLE wishedrole;.
How to pass the wishedrole value to the structure?
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION f_switch_role(INOUT text,INOUT boolean) AS
$BODY$
DECLARE
wishedrole ALIAS
On Aug 18, 9:23 pm, Lew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dale wrote:
Hi,
I've got some code which postgres 8.3.3 won't accept. Postgres
doesn't like the INTO clause on RETURNING INTO and I've tried
following the documentation.
UPDATE EntityRelation SET Status = inStatus, Modified =
Dale wrote:
Hi,
I've got some code which postgres 8.3.3 won't accept. Postgres
doesn't like the INTO clause on RETURNING INTO and I've tried
following the documentation.
UPDATE EntityRelation SET Status = inStatus, Modified =
Session_TimeStamp(), ModifiedBy = UserID() WHERE (RelationID =
Hi,
I've got some code which postgres 8.3.3 won't accept. Postgres
doesn't like the INTO clause on RETURNING INTO and I've tried
following the documentation.
UPDATE EntityRelation SET Status = inStatus, Modified =
Session_TimeStamp(), ModifiedBy = UserID() WHERE (RelationID =
inRelationID) AND
Hi,
Does PostgreSQL can run on Windows x64?
If yes, which version?
Thanks,
G
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 7:48 AM, Goboxe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Does PostgreSQL can run on Windows x64?
If yes, which version?
All versions (though you should start with 8.3.3):
I just learnt that NOT DEFERRABLE is default.
I vaguely understand that generally stricter policies protect
distracted programmers from making mistakes... but missing an alter
constraint it makes refactoring a PITA.
Is it mandated by SQL standard?
Any other rational reason to make NOT DEFERRABLE
I have a problem with pg_dump on 2 computers. On the first computer, pg_dump
runs very well, but on the second pg_dump has a error :
pg_dump: reading triggers for table ph57
pg_dump: reading triggers for table phts
pg_dump: reading dependency data
pg_dump: SQL command failed
pg_dump: Error message
Am Tuesday, 19. August 2008 schrieb Ivan Sergio Borgonovo:
I just learnt that NOT DEFERRABLE is default.
Is it mandated by SQL standard?
Yes.
Is there any shortcut if I've to change to deferrable most of my
constraints?
Probably not, short of writing a little script.
Other than pgfoundry
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:20:08 +0300
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Tuesday, 19. August 2008 schrieb Ivan Sergio Borgonovo:
I just learnt that NOT DEFERRABLE is default.
Is it mandated by SQL standard?
Yes.
Is there any reason they put it that way in the standard other than
Does this mean anything to anyone?
Faulting application postgres.exe, version 8.3.3.8160, faulting module
msvcr80.dll, version 8.0.50727.1433, fault address 0x0001e44a.
I have a function that's doing a summary report counting data. It makes
a couple of small temp tables then makes a big
Олег Василенко wrote:
I wish to have a function with code above, but compiller generate
syntactic error at the line SET SESSION ROLE wishedrole;.
How to pass the wishedrole value to the structure?
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION f_switch_role(INOUT text,INOUT boolean) AS
$BODY$
DECLARE
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:49:11 +0200
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:20:08 +0300
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Tuesday, 19. August 2008 schrieb Ivan Sergio Borgonovo:
I just learnt that NOT DEFERRABLE is default.
Is it mandated by SQL
Is there any control structure statement similar to select case ... ? If yes
how to use it. I have tried to use, case when expression then expression
end, but not worked well as I want to use other control structures and sql
statements to be executed for each case.
Please reply.
Thanks
CPK.
Hello
Develop PL/pgSQL (PostgreSQL 8.4) has CASE statement. Actual and
older version hasn't nothing similar.
Regards
Pavel Stehule
2008/8/19 c k [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is there any control structure statement similar to select case ... ? If yes
how to use it. I have tried to use, case when
In response to Ow Mun Heng [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 11:01 -0400, justin wrote:
Ow Mun Heng wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Scott Marlowe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you're looking at read only / read
mostly, then RAID5 or 6 might be a better choice than
In response to Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Aug 18, 9:23 pm, Lew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dale wrote:
Hi,
I've got some code which postgres 8.3.3 won't accept. Postgres
doesn't like the INTO clause on RETURNING INTO and I've tried
following the documentation.
UPDATE
In response to c k [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is there any control structure statement similar to select case ... ? If yes
how to use it. I have tried to use, case when expression then expression
end, but not worked well as I want to use other control structures and sql
statements to be executed for
Hi,
I want to create a function as follows:
case variable=value1
SQL statements
case variable=value2
SQL statements
case else
end of case
CPK
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Bill Moran
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
In response to c k [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is there any control structure
On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 02:28 -0400, David Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Amber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all:
We are currently considering using PostgreSQL to host a read only
warehouse,
we would like to get some experiences, best practices and performance metrics
c k wrote:
Hi,
I want to create a function as follows:
case variable=value1
SQL statements
case variable=value2
SQL statements
case else
end of case
Looks like you want to use pl/pgsl and IF ... THEN ... ELSE instead?
Cheers
Tino
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Am Tuesday, 19. August 2008 schrieb Ivan Sergio Borgonovo:
Is there any reason they put it that way in the standard other than
the mantra stricter is better?
After reflecting a bit I think it is a matter of failing earlier.
Deferrable constraints are an optional feature of SQL, and the
i use the ps -ef | grep postgres to see all the connections. the
connection's status is Idle in transcation.
and i use the du -h /mydb to check the disk size. The disk size of
mydb has increased from 400MB to 600MB.
Why? because of the idle in transcation ?
my pg version:8.1.3
OS: Linux
Hello List,
When an initdb is done where do the default postgresql.conf and pg_hba.conf
come from? Are they
copied from some template file?
Thanks,
Steve
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
Steve Clark a écrit :
Hello List,
When an initdb is done where do the default postgresql.conf and
pg_hba.conf come from? Are they
copied from some template file?
They are copied from the share subdirectory. For example, in Debian,
it's in:
/usr/share/postgresql/major version
Klint Gore [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Faulting application postgres.exe, version 8.3.3.8160, faulting module
msvcr80.dll, version 8.0.50727.1433, fault address 0x0001e44a.
I have a function that's doing a summary report counting data. It makes
a couple of small temp tables then makes a big
Albe Laurenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
EXECUTE 'SET SESSION ROLE ' || lower(regexp_replace(wishedrole, '', '',
'g')) || '';
The lower and regexp_replace are there to prevent SQL injection.
quote_ident() would be a far better solution.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent
Bill Moran wrote:
Is it possible that your UPDATE command is updating multiple rows? I
don't believe RETURNING will work on an UPDATE that touches more than 1
row.
Hmm, why not?
alvherre= create table bill (a int, b text);
CREATE TABLE
alvherre= insert into bill values (1, 'one');
INSERT 0
In response to Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bill Moran wrote:
Is it possible that your UPDATE command is updating multiple rows? I
don't believe RETURNING will work on an UPDATE that touches more than 1
row.
Hmm, why not?
Because a doc linked to earlier in this thread said so.
Charles.Hou [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i use the ps -ef | grep postgres to see all the connections. the
connection's status is Idle in transcation.
and i use the du -h /mydb to check the disk size. The disk size of
mydb has increased from 400MB to 600MB.
Why? because of the idle in
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bill Moran wrote:
Is it possible that your UPDATE command is updating multiple rows? I
don't believe RETURNING will work on an UPDATE that touches more than 1
row.
Hmm, why not?
plpgsql will reject UPDATE RETURNING INTO that returns more than one
I'm working on a CMS, one of the features of the CMS in question is
that only one user can edit an item at any given time. I've
implemented this by having one table that holds the items, and another
table that holds locks. A lock row consists of the ID of the item
locked, a timestamp indicating
Dave,
Thanks for the link.
Our app now running using EnterpriseDB 8.2 on x86.
Plan to test them on x64 server once we got it.
Do you know if jdbc, npgsql, PostgreSQL ANSI odbc drivers bundled in
EnterpriseDB can run without any issues on x64?
Thanks,
Amin
On Aug 19, 3:50 pm, [EMAIL
On Tuesday 19 August 2008, Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to be able to restrict any query that updates or deletes from
the articles table so that they can only occur if there isn't a
corresponding entry in the locks table. As far as I can tell,
however, you can't join tables when
On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 07:34 -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
In theory, you can have so many disks that the bottleneck moves to
some
other location, such as the IO bus or memory or the CPU, but I've
never
heard of that happening to anyone. Also, you want to get fast, high-
quality disks, as 10
On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 11:42 +0800, Amber wrote:
Dear all:
We are currently considering using PostgreSQL to host a read only
warehouse, we would like to get some experiences, best practices and
performance metrics from the user community, following is the question list:
1. What's size
I got following error while testing some newly created functions.
ERROR: cache lookup failed for function 111462
CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function uf_postdoc line 25 at FOR over SELECT rows
** Error **
ERROR: cache lookup failed for function 111462
SQL state: XX000
Context: PL/pgSQL
hello,
what will be the error in syntax of following statement?
delete from accountingtransactions where
accountingtransactions.refaccdocid=docs.docid and docs.tmpselect=-1 and
docs.tmpselectedby= $1;
when a new function is created it does not gives any error but when this
function is called from
Add the USING list clause:
usinglist
A list of table expressions, allowing columns from other tables to
appear in the WHERE condition. This is similar to the list of tables
that can be specified in the FROM Clause
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/sql-select.html#SQL-FROM of
a
tuanhoanganh escribió:
I have a problem with pg_dump on 2 computers. On the first computer, pg_dump
runs very well, but on the second pg_dump has a error :
pg_dump: reading triggers for table ph57
pg_dump: reading triggers for table phts
pg_dump: reading dependency data
pg_dump: SQL command
On 8/19/08, Goboxe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave,
Thanks for the link.
np.
Our app now running using EnterpriseDB 8.2 on x86.
Plan to test them on x64 server once we got it.
Do you know if jdbc, npgsql, PostgreSQL ANSI odbc drivers bundled in
EnterpriseDB can run without any issues on
I'm setting up WAL archiving on a Windows machine need to copy the WAL
files to a network drive.
Is it best to give the 'postgres' user network access archive the WAL
files directly to the network drive? Or archive the WAL files to a local
folder and then use a scheduled task to move them
Rob Adams wrote:
I'm setting up WAL archiving on a Windows machine need to copy the WAL
files to a network drive.
Is it best to give the 'postgres' user network access archive the WAL
files directly to the network drive? Or archive the WAL files to a local
folder and then use a scheduled
I have to explicitly specify the schema name to make SQL statement to
work.
Can I set the schema before the query, or set a default schema?
My current statement:
SELECT col FROM schema.table
I like to be able to use generic SQL statement like:
SELECT col FROM table
--
Sent via pgsql-general
-- Original message --
From: Masis, Alexander (US SSA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have to explicitly specify the schema name to make SQL statement to
work.
Can I set the schema before the query, or set a default schema?
My current statement:
SELECT col FROM
Hi All,
In the following documentation it advises that the UPDATE statement should
be able to return a value into a variable in plpgsql.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/plpgsql-statements.html
It works for the INSERT command, but not UPDATE. For the INSERT command, it
makes my code
Tom Lane wrote:
Klint Gore [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Faulting application postgres.exe, version 8.3.3.8160, faulting module
msvcr80.dll, version 8.0.50727.1433, fault address 0x0001e44a.
I have a function that's doing a summary report counting data. It makes
a couple of small temp
Klint Gore [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[ heavy RAISE NOTICE traffic crashes the server ]
Tom Lane wrote:
Please try to narrow it down a little.
client=warning, log=warning completes
client=warning, log=notice fails
client=notice, log=warning completes
client=notice, log=notice fails
It
Dale Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In the following documentation it advises that the UPDATE statement should
be able to return a value into a variable in plpgsql.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/plpgsql-statements.html
It works for the INSERT command, but not UPDATE.
As was
Tom Lane wrote:
Klint Gore [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[ heavy RAISE NOTICE traffic crashes the server ]
client=warning, log=warning completes
client=warning, log=notice fails
client=notice, log=warning completes
client=notice, log=notice fails
It fails a heck of a lot quicker with
Dale Harris wrote:
It works for the INSERT command, but not UPDATE. For the INSERT command, it
makes my code look neater and I image it's more efficient too.
This time I am trying to UPDATE a field using a primary key, and return
another field into a variable so that I can take necessary
As per the original message:
I've got some code which postgres 8.3.3 won't accept. Postgres doesn't
like the INTO clause on RETURNING INTO and I've tried following the
documentation.
UPDATE EntityRelation SET Status = inStatus, Modified =
Session_TimeStamp(), ModifiedBy = UserID() WHERE
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 04:01:55 pm Adrian Klaver wrote:
-- Original message --
From: Masis, Alexander (US SSA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have to explicitly specify the schema name to make SQL statement to
work.
Can I set the schema before the query, or set a
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Dale Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As per the original message:
UPDATE EntityRelation SET Status = inStatus, Modified =
Session_TimeStamp(), ModifiedBy = UserID() WHERE (RelationID =
inRelationID) AND (EntityID = inEnityID) AND IsEqual(inRelatedID,
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:53 PM, johnf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 04:01:55 pm Adrian Klaver wrote:
From: Masis, Alexander (US SSA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have to explicitly specify the schema name to make SQL statement to
work.
Can I set the schema before the query,
Dale Harris wrote:
As per the original message:
I've got some code which postgres 8.3.3 won't accept. Postgres
doesn't like the INTO clause on RETURNING INTO and I've tried
following the documentation.
UPDATE EntityRelation SET Status = inStatus, Modified =
Session_TimeStamp(),
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 10:06:55 pm Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:53 PM, johnf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 04:01:55 pm Adrian Klaver wrote:
From: Masis, Alexander (US SSA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have to explicitly specify the schema name to make
Hi,
I have a database I can psql into... How can I determine what its
absolute path is so I can use pg_ctl on it to restart it? Because
when I use pg_ctl, it tells me I have to provide it in the -D flag as
an argument.
Thanks,
matt
--
It is from the wellspring of our despair and the places
Hi,
I just installed postgresql 8.3 on Ubuntu Heron with Postgis. I've
worked with this install on XP before, but not on Linux. I'm having
trouble telling if the postmaster is started. But, maybe more root to
the problem, I cannot log onto the database via 'psql' when I supply
what I think I
-Original Message-
From: johnf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] schema name in SQL statement.
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:25:14 -0700
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 10:06:55 pm Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:53 PM, johnf [EMAIL
61 matches
Mail list logo
