Hi
I have been grappling with a problem for some time I would appreciate some
advice on. We have a public health application which is web based with a
postgresql backing store which is designed for use by the public sector
ministry of health in a significant number of African, Asian and other
Ok, thanks.
I mean by original wal segments to files generated in pg_xlog, yes. I have
to 0 the parameter wal_keep_segments. They are being generated with 16MB of
size and they are being rotated. What parameter controls how many files can
be generated? Or will it grow indefinitely?
Thanks
Thank you very much for your replies.
Cheers...
2014-06-29 13:28 GMT+01:00 Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Oliver ofab...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you very much for your reply.
I've spoken with my boss, databases aren't so important, so if there
I have employee table. Where I have a column joining_date. Now I am looking for
a way to get all employee, who completed 5 years, 10 years current month. How
to do so ? I am not able to figure this out.
Regards,
Arup Rakshit
On 30 June 2014 12:38, Arup Rakshit arupraks...@rocketmail.com wrote:
I have employee table. Where I have a column joining_date. Now I am
looking for a way to get all employee, who completed 5 years, 10 years
current month. How to do so ? I am not able to figure this out.
Regards,
Arup
Please avoid top-posting...
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Oliver ofab...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, thanks.
I mean by original wal segments to files generated in pg_xlog, yes. I have
to 0 the parameter wal_keep_segments. They are being generated with 16MB of
size and they are being rotated.
Hi Bob.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Bob Jolliffe bobjolli...@gmail.com wrote:
What are people's thoughts about a more optimal solution? I would like to
use a more incremental approach to replication. This does not have to be a
live replication .. asynchronously triggering once every 24
Suppose I have users table. I have a joining_date. Now I only want those users
who completed 5 years, 10 years, and in which date they completed.
Example:
Out of all users, suppose below users only -
Foo_1 on 24/1/2014 completed 10 years
Foo_2 on 2/2/2014 completed 10 years
Foo_3 on
I've been using Postgres for a small project and I've been very impressed
by its flexibility in defining new types and functions. I very much like
having the ability to define a clean relational model and then a set of
functions that act as the API to the data stored in my model.
Does
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:46:42 +0300 Emre Hasegeli e...@hasegeli.com wrote:
I've been using Postgres for a small project and I've been very impressed
by its flexibility in defining new types and functions. I very much like
having the ability to define a clean relational model and then a set
Ben Ellis, 29.06.2014 03:10:
Hi all,
I've been using Postgres for a small project and I've been very
impressed by its flexibility in defining new types and functions. I
very much like having the ability to define a clean relational model
and then a set of functions that act as the API to
Hi Arup,
Two ways come to mind for me. They're pretty much the same as Szymon's,
just minus the sample table creation. I would suggest creating a view
instead, so you can just select from it whenever you please.
create view vw_employee as
select * from employees
where
On Monday, June 30, 2014 04:52:32 PM you wrote:
Hi Arup,
Two ways come to mind for me. They're pretty much the same as Szymon's,
just minus the sample table creation. I would suggest creating a view
instead, so you can just select from it whenever you please.
create view vw_employee as
On 30 June 2014 17:52, Rebecca Clarke r.clark...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Arup,
Two ways come to mind for me. They're pretty much the same as Szymon's,
just minus the sample table creation. I would suggest creating a view
instead, so you can just select from it whenever you please.
create
Rebecca Clarke-2 wrote
create view vw_employee as
select * from employees
where ((age(joining_date::date) like '5 years%') or
(age(joining_date::date) like '10 years%') )
This does not give the correct answer to the poster's question - the LIKE
with a trailing % will pick up non-round
On Monday, June 30, 2014 04:52:32 PM Rebecca Clarke wrote:
Hi Arup,
Two ways come to mind for me. They're pretty much the same as Szymon's,
just minus the sample table creation. I would suggest creating a view
instead, so you can just select from it whenever you please.
create view
How does one define the most limited role/user possible in PostgreSQL?
Ideally, this role would not be able to do *anything* at all. In
particular, this role would not be able to query meta-information about
existing tables, functions, etc. with backslash commands such as \dt, \df.
(Of course,
Kynn Jones kyn...@gmail.com writes:
How does one define the most limited role/user possible in PostgreSQL?
Ideally, this role would not be able to do *anything* at all. In
particular, this role would not be able to query meta-information about
existing tables, functions,
etc. with
Hi,
I try to do what seems to be totally simple, but it fails. If I query a view
that contains renamed columns without any qualifier like
SELECT * FROM myview
it displays everything. If however I do
SELECT reanmedviewcolumn FROM myview
It tells me column does not exist which in fact does. I
I see lots of similar log message at a certain time in a day on Postgresql
9,.1:
LOG: process 18855 still waiting for ShareLock on transaction 2856146023
after 1001.209 ms
STATEMENT: UPDATE table1 SET time = $1 WHERE id = $2
The table1 size is 17 G.
What could be the reason for this lock
Alexander Reichstadt wrote
Hi,
I try to do what seems to be totally simple, but it fails. If I query a
view that contains renamed columns without any qualifier like
SELECT * FROM myview
it displays everything. If however I do
SELECT reanmedviewcolumn FROM myview
It tells me
Alexander Reichstadt l...@mac.com writes:
I try to do what seems to be totally simple, but it fails. If I query a view
that contains renamed columns without any qualifier like
SELECT * FROM myview
it displays everything. If however I do
SELECT reanmedviewcolumn FROM myview
It tells me
Hi, Im new to postgresql and sql in general. I desired to write a program in C that used an sql data base for IPC and because multiple copies of my program might run on the same machine I wanted a way to ensure that only one copy of each multithreaded program got one database but Im uncertain how
On 06/30/2014 05:58 PM, frank ernest wrote:
Hi, I'm new to postgresql and sql in general. I desired to write a
program in C that used an sql data base for IPC and because multiple
copies of my program might run on the same machine I wanted a way to
ensure that only one copy of each
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 7:36 AM, AI Rumman rumman...@gmail.com wrote:
I see lots of similar log message at a certain time in a day on Postgresql
9,.1:
LOG: process 18855 still waiting for ShareLock on transaction 2856146023
after 1001.209 ms
STATEMENT: UPDATE table1 SET time = $1 WHERE id
Hi,
I've been trying out PostgreSQL 9.3 with pl/perl built against Ubuntu 14.04
LTS' Perl 5.18
(Sourced from apt.postgresql.org)
Maybe I'm doing something wrong, but it appears that plperl has become
completely useless, as it can't load any new modules, but modern Perl versions
have refactored
On 6/30/2014 4:58 PM, frank ernest wrote:
Hi, I'm new to postgresql and sql in general. I desired to write a
program in C that used an sql data base for IPC and because multiple
copies of my program might run on the same machine I wanted a way to
ensure that only one copy of each multithreaded
27 matches
Mail list logo
