On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 12:38:04PM +0800, Phoenix Kiula wrote:
My hosting provider tells me that the Postgresql server is taking up a
lot of memory but I've been running the same db with the same config
for over 2 years. Yes we have been growing but what happened in the
last 3 days to warrant
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 09:09:32PM +0800, Phoenix Kiula wrote:
Actually my host has just told me that I have a number of hung
semaphores in my server. And he is relating them to postgresql. I am
not surprised, because this is the only utility that has issues. All
the rest is working (apache,
On 17/02/2008, Andrej Ricnik-Bay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16/02/2008, Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
top -bc | tee topdata
That will save everything to a file called topdata while also letting you
watch it scroll by. Not as easy to catch the bad periods that way, the
output is
On 17/02/2008, Shashank Tripathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 17/02/2008, Andrej Ricnik-Bay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 17/02/2008, Phoenix Kiula [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
~ top -b -d 1 | awk -f top.awk | tee topdata
awk: top.awk:24: for(i=8;ilast;i++
awk: top.awk:24:
On 17/02/2008, Phoenix Kiula [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But this is kind of sitting there, hogging the command prompt. Is
there any way I can let it go on in the background?
Ouch ... no, that's entirely my fault, wasn't quite awake I
guess, and hadn't thought it through completely ... that's
not
Hi,
I have an index on the user_id field in the query below:
myuser=# delete from clients where user_id like '64.22.91.%';
DELETE 22
Time: 220324.975 ms
Is there any reason why it's taking 220 seconds to run this simple
query? There are about 3 million rows in this table.
How can I
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Phoenix Kiula [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I have an index on the user_id field in the query below:
myuser=# delete from clients where user_id like '64.22.91.%';
DELETE 22
Time: 220324.975 ms
Is there any reason why it's taking 220 seconds to run
Phoenix Kiula wrote:
Hi,
I have an index on the user_id field in the query below:
myuser=# delete from clients where user_id like '64.22.91.%';
DELETE 22
Time: 220324.975 ms
Is there any reason why it's taking 220 seconds to run this simple
query? There are about 3 million rows in
On 15/02/2008, Shoaib Mir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Phoenix Kiula [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I have an index on the user_id field in the query below:
myuser=# delete from clients where user_id like '64.22.91.%';
DELETE 22
Time: 220324.975
On 15/02/2008, Richard Huxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First guess is that it's not using the index. What does
EXPLAIN ANALYSE SELECT user_id FROM clients WHERE user_id LIKE '...'
show?
Check the list archives for locale and like and text_pattern_ops too -
that's a good place to check.
Phoenix Kiula wrote:
On 15/02/2008, Richard Huxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First guess is that it's not using the index. What does
EXPLAIN ANALYSE SELECT user_id FROM clients WHERE user_id LIKE '...'
show?
Check the list archives for locale and like and text_pattern_ops too -
that's a
Actually my host has just told me that I have a number of hung
semaphores in my server. And he is relating them to postgresql. I am
not surprised, because this is the only utility that has issues. All
the rest is working (apache, mysql, exim, etc). Any thoughts on where
I should start looking for
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Phoenix Kiula [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How should I install a contrib without bringing down my database, or
stopping it, or doing ANYTHING to it? It's in production. I can't
touch it. Will it be installed on the side and then I simply start
using it?
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Phoenix Kiula [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks. But I had installed from rpm. Can I just download that .so
file and put in the lib folder for pgsql and then start using it?
Well I would say download the source for the same version you have, copy it
to your
On 15/02/2008, Shoaib Mir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You do not need to restart the database server for that purpose as all you
need is the pgstattuple.so file copied to PG-HOME/lib folder.
Do the following (in case you have installed server from source):
- Go to the
Phoenix Kiula wrote:
On 15/02/2008, Richard Huxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, more new information! This does seem to point to the load,
particularly if it's exactly the same query each time. So what do
top/vmstat etc show for these go-slow periods?
In included top and vmstat info in my
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Shoaib Mir [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Phoenix Kiula [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. But I had installed from rpm. Can I just download that .so
file and put in the lib folder for pgsql and then start using it?
Well I
On 2/15/08, Harald Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But you have to ensure that you build PostgreSQL on your desktop
machine in exactly the same way as the RPM got built
(integer_datetimes etc).
It'd probably be much easier to just install the -contrib RPM. :)
--
-Doug
On 2/15/08, Phoenix Kiula [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LOG: could not receive data from client: Connection reset by peer
LOG: unexpected EOF on client connection
LOG: could not receive data from client: Connection reset by peer
LOG: unexpected EOF on client connection
This means your
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Phoenix Kiula [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. They are the vmstat figures from when I was replying to your
email. What will vmstat tell me and how should I set it up to do
vmstat 10 logging?
Something like
vmstat 10 vmstat.log
LOG: could not receive data
Phoenix Kiula wrote:
On 15/02/2008, Richard Huxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you sure the two sets of vmstat/top figures are from when PG was
crashing/running queries slow? Everything seems idle to me in those figures.
No. They are the vmstat figures from when I was replying to your
On 15/02/2008, Richard Huxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phoenix Kiula wrote:
On 15/02/2008, Richard Huxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, more new information! This does seem to point to the load,
particularly if it's exactly the same query each time. So what do
top/vmstat etc show
On 15/02/2008, Richard Huxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phoenix Kiula wrote:
On 15/02/2008, Richard Huxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you sure the two sets of vmstat/top figures are from when PG was
crashing/running queries slow? Everything seems idle to me in those
figures.
On 16/02/2008, Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Phoenix Kiula wrote:
The script you suggested doesn't work:
tmp ./trackusage.sh
-bash: ./trackusage.sh: /bin/sh: bad interpreter: Permission denied
Try changing the first line to
#!/bin/bash
Thanks
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Phoenix Kiula wrote:
The script you suggested doesn't work:
tmp ./trackusage.sh
-bash: ./trackusage.sh: /bin/sh: bad interpreter: Permission denied
Try changing the first line to
#!/bin/bash
Anyway, I did the vmstat command. I was running it while the system
was
On Feb 15, 2008 10:38 PM, Phoenix Kiula [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My hosting provider tells me that the Postgresql server is taking up a
lot of memory but I've been running the same db with the same config
for over 2 years. Yes we have been growing but what happened in the
last 3 days to
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Phoenix Kiula wrote:
The top output shows httpd on top, and sometimes postmaster, but I don't
know how to repeatedly capture it. Any suggestions?
Try this:
top -bc | tee topdata
That will save everything to a file called topdata while also letting you
watch it scroll
27 matches
Mail list logo
