Am 19.02.2007 um 17:49 schrieb Jan Wieck:
Oh, this one wasn't about raw speed of trivial single table
statements like all the others?
No, it wasn't. They also tested the insert performance of a system
without foreign keys and without transactions (MySQL MyISAM) against
systems with
On 2/21/07, Guido Neitzer wrote:
It would be more or less the same, if you compare copy against insert
performance on PostgreSQL and state that insert should be as fast as
copy without saying why.
Btw: these guys claim to be database consultants.
Guess one should consider oneself lucky not to
On 2/20/2007 3:51 PM, Andrej Ricnik-Bay wrote:
On 2/21/07, Guido Neitzer wrote:
It would be more or less the same, if you compare copy against insert
performance on PostgreSQL and state that insert should be as fast as
copy without saying why.
Btw: these guys claim to be database consultants.
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 12:02:08AM +0100, Leif B. Kristensen wrote:
There ought to be a proper name for this kind of pseudo-technical Gonzo
journalism.
There is, but it's not the sort of word one uses in polite company
;-)
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unfortunately
Tom Allison wrote:
Leif B. Kristensen wrote:
On Friday 16. February 2007 07:10, Tom Lane wrote:
Perhaps this
paper can be described as comparing an F-15 to a 747 on the basis of
required runway length.
There ought to be a proper name for this kind of pseudo-technical
Gonzo journalism. The
On 2/16/2007 1:10 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
extra points, use *only one* test case. Perhaps this paper can be
described as comparing an F-15 to a 747 on the basis of required
runway length.
Oh, this one wasn't about raw speed of trivial single table statements
like all the others?
Jan
--
Marc Evans schrieb:
Some people may find this interesting reading.
http://us.devloop.org.uk/
Nice, but it would be interesting which storage engine was used for
mysql - ok, default is MyIsam.
Does mysql (in the latest version) still use a single write-thread for
writing?
In mysql 3, a
Richard Huxton schrieb:
Shelby Cain wrote:
Excerpt from the document:
===
2. What is compared here - Apples and Oranges
The setups are as standard as can be. The only principle guiding the
installation of all the software is simplicity. No
Am 15.02.2007 um 13:05 schrieb Alexander Elgert:
Nice, but it would be interesting which storage engine was used for
mysql - ok, default is MyIsam.
They used MyISAM as it is described late in the paper.
cug
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4:
Leif B. Kristensen wrote:
On Friday 16. February 2007 07:10, Tom Lane wrote:
Perhaps this
paper can be described as comparing an F-15 to a 747 on the basis of
required runway length.
There ought to be a proper name for this kind of pseudo-technical Gonzo
journalism. The Internet is full of
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Am 15.02.2007 um 11:21 schrieb Marc Evans:
These *peeep* [deleted] compared MySQL with MyISAM to ACID compliant
databases. So why not compare an F-15 to 747? What? Apples and Oranges?
Bad analogy. Both the F-15 and
On Friday 16. February 2007 07:10, Tom Lane wrote:
Perhaps this
paper can be described as comparing an F-15 to a 747 on the basis of
required runway length.
There ought to be a proper name for this kind of pseudo-technical Gonzo
journalism. The Internet is full of it.
--
Leif Biberg
Excerpt from the document:
===
2. What is compared here - Apples and Oranges
The setups are as standard as can be. The only principle guiding the
installation of all the software is simplicity. No optimization, no tweaks, no
editing of
On Thursday 15 February 2007 11:29, Shelby Cain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
===
2. What is compared here - Apples and Oranges
The setups are as standard as can be. The only principle guiding the
installation of all the software is simplicity. No
Shelby Cain wrote:
Excerpt from the document:
===
2. What is compared here - Apples and Oranges
The setups are as standard as can be. The only principle guiding the
installation of all the software is simplicity. No optimization, no tweaks, no
In response to Shelby Cain [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Excerpt from the document:
===
2. What is compared here - Apples and Oranges
The setups are as standard as can be. The only principle guiding the
installation of all the software is simplicity.
Am 15.02.2007 um 11:21 schrieb Marc Evans:
http://us.devloop.org.uk/
These *peeep* [deleted] compared MySQL with MyISAM to ACID
compliant databases. So why not compare an F-15 to 747? What? Apples
and Oranges? So what? You can compare anything you want, right? Only
the result
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/15/07 15:29, Guido Neitzer wrote:
Am 15.02.2007 um 11:21 schrieb Marc Evans:
http://us.devloop.org.uk/
These *peeep* [deleted] compared MySQL with MyISAM to ACID compliant
databases. So why not compare an F-15 to 747? What?
18 matches
Mail list logo
