On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Jim Nasby jim.na...@bluetreble.com wrote:
On 4/18/15 12:47 AM, David G. Johnston wrote:
If you could find a way to pass a value of type some_table into the
function - instead of the name/text 'some_table‘ - you could possibly
use polymorphic
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Jim Nasby jim.na...@bluetreble.com
wrote:
On 4/18/15 12:47 AM, David G. Johnston wrote:
If you could find a way to pass a value of type some_table into the
function - instead of
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 9:40 AM, David G. Johnston
david.g.johns...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Jim Nasby jim.na...@bluetreble.com
wrote:
On 4/18/15 12:47 AM, David G. Johnston wrote:
If
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 11:40 AM, David G. Johnston
david.g.johns...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Jim Nasby jim.na...@bluetreble.com
wrote:
On 4/18/15 12:47 AM, David G. Johnston wrote:
If you
On 4/18/15 12:47 AM, David G. Johnston wrote:
If you could find a way to pass a value of type some_table into the
function - instead of the name/text 'some_table‘ - you could possibly
use polymorphic pseudotypes...just imagining here...
Oh, I didn't think about that. Maybe I'll try it.
What
On 4/17/15 7:39 PM, David G. Johnston wrote:
On Friday, April 17, 2015, Jim Nasby jim.na...@bluetreble.com
mailto:jim.na...@bluetreble.com wrote:
I'm working on a function that will return a set of test data, for
unit testing database stuff. It does a few things, but ultimately
On Friday, April 17, 2015, Jim Nasby jim.na...@bluetreble.com wrote:
On 4/17/15 7:39 PM, David G. Johnston wrote:
On Friday, April 17, 2015, Jim Nasby jim.na...@bluetreble.com
mailto:jim.na...@bluetreble.com wrote:
I'm working on a function that will return a set of test data, for
I'm working on a function that will return a set of test data, for unit
testing database stuff. It does a few things, but ultimately returns
SETOF record that's essentially:
RETURN QUERY EXECUTE 'SELECT * FROM ' || table_name;
Because it's always going to return a real relation, I'd like to
On Friday, April 17, 2015, Jim Nasby jim.na...@bluetreble.com wrote:
I'm working on a function that will return a set of test data, for unit
testing database stuff. It does a few things, but ultimately returns SETOF
record that's essentially:
RETURN QUERY EXECUTE 'SELECT * FROM ' ||
