Re: [PATCHES] Explain XML patch v2

2008-07-05 Thread Dave Page
to pgAdmin, and doesn't require that we instruct users to install more server side plugin code to use the features they want. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http

Re: [PATCHES] Explain XML patch v2

2008-07-04 Thread Dave Page
an optional format that pgAdmin could request with appropriate grammar, it would be something that was only available if the plugin was loaded, and would replace regular EXPLAIN output? If so, that would be extremely inconvenient, and next to useless for general purpose utilities. -- Dave Page

Re: [PATCHES] Explain XML patch v2

2008-07-02 Thread Dave Page
or information gathering tool more or less impossible to write. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches

Re: [PATCHES] Exposing keywords to clients

2008-05-03 Thread Dave Page
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 12:24 AM, Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dave Page wrote: Hi, The attached patch implements a new function, pg_get_keywords(), which returns a set of records describing the keywords recognised by the server. This allows clients such as pgAdmin to get

Re: [PATCHES] Exposing keywords to clients

2008-05-03 Thread Dave Page
| Type or function name -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com Index: doc/src/sgml/func.sgml === RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml,v retrieving revision 1.434 diff -c -r1.434 func.sgml

Re: [PATCHES] Exposing keywords to clients

2008-05-03 Thread Dave Page
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Attached is an updated patch, giving the following output. Oh, one other thing: dropping externs into random modules unrelated to their source module is completely awful programming style

[PATCHES] Exposing keywords to clients

2008-05-02 Thread Dave Page
| Unreserved (372 rows) I wasn't sure about the best way to describe the categories - obviously they need to be non-translatable (for client software to interpret), but human readable is also nice. I'm happy to hear alternate suggestions. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http

Re: [PATCHES] DTrace probe patch for OS X Leopard

2008-03-14 Thread Dave Page
(please nudge me if I miss it). -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK Ltd: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref

Re: [PATCHES] Fix for initdb failures on Vista

2008-03-04 Thread Dave Page
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 6:41 PM, Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Will you provide a patch for that, or should I? (I remind you I have no box ready to reproduce it on, so it helps a lot if you can do it :-P) Patch attached. Tested on XP and Vista. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK Ltd

Re: [PATCHES] Fix for initdb failures on Vista

2008-02-29 Thread Dave Page
tests, no? Yeah, that should do it. Meanwhile, I'll apply what we have with my additios and cleanups per mine and Heikkis comments, because they fix the most important codepaths. Thanks for putting the final polish on this. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK Ltd: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL

[PATCHES] Fix for initdb failures on Vista

2008-02-21 Thread Dave Page
process. This remains secure because administrative privileges are granted to the groups that we've dropped, not the user itself. I've tested on Vista and XP, but additional testing would be useful (Andrew, Magnus?). Please apply to head, 8.3 and 8.2 -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http

Re: [PATCHES] WIP: plpgsql source code obfuscation

2008-01-28 Thread Dave Page
On Jan 28, 2008 12:51 PM, Pavel Stehule [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello this patch define new function flag - OBFUSCATE. With this flag encrypted source code is stored to probin column. Password is stored in GUC_SUPERUSER_ONLY item - it is similar security like SQL Server does (where

Re: [PATCHES] WIP: plpgsql source code obfuscation

2008-01-28 Thread Dave Page
On Jan 28, 2008 2:26 PM, Pavel Stehule [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sure, but do you know, Tom dislikes new columns in pg_proc :). Tom doesn't seem to like the idea of obfuscation of function code much either :-) This patch is usable sample of one possible solution and doesn't need initdb. And

Re: [PATCHES] [GENERAL] Forgot to dump old data before re-installing machine

2008-01-18 Thread Dave Page
On 18/01/2008, Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tom Lane wrote: What would work better is to add some code that checks whether pg_control_version looks like the byte-swap of a small number, and prints a suitably modified error message if so. Here is a possible patch. Example

Re: [PATCHES] win32.mak patch

2008-01-09 Thread Dave Page
On 08/01/2008, Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 10:02:24AM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote: A question there though - do we care about the length of time_t on client platforms, or should we instead just disable the whole check for the client? AFAICS we don't expose

Re: [PATCHES] pgbench - startup delay

2007-12-11 Thread Dave Page
Tom Lane wrote: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Alvaro Herrera wrote: I think you could get the same effect by putting the -W in PGOPTIONS (in pgbench's environment). That's a good point. It does have the downside that it will affect the pgbench results - though that wouldn't actually

[PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] Problem with ControlFileData structure being ABI depe ndent

2007-12-10 Thread Dave Page
Dave Page wrote: Tom Lane wrote: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Gregory Stark wrote: An alternative is leaving it in the project file but putting something like this in c.h: Put it in win32.h, please. c.h shouldn't get cluttered with platform-specific kluges when there's no need

[PATCHES] pgbench - startup delay

2007-12-10 Thread Dave Page
Whilst doing some profiling of the server I found it useful to add an option to pgbench to introduce a delay between client connection setup and the start of the benchmark itself to allow me time to attach the profiler to one of the backends. Attached is the patch in case anyone finds a use for

Re: [PATCHES] pgbench - startup delay

2007-12-10 Thread Dave Page
Neil Conway wrote: On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 19:27 +, Dave Page wrote: Whilst doing some profiling of the server I found it useful to add an option to pgbench to introduce a delay between client connection setup and the start of the benchmark itself to allow me time to attach the profiler

Re: [PATCHES] pgbench - startup delay

2007-12-10 Thread Dave Page
Alvaro Herrera wrote: Dave Page wrote: I'm aware of postgres -W, but wanted something that wouldn't get in the way of other connections and would only affect my pgbench tests. I think you could get the same effect by putting the -W in PGOPTIONS (in pgbench's environment). That's a good

Re: [PATCHES] Win32: Minimising desktop heap usage

2007-10-23 Thread Dave Page
Tom Lane wrote: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [ get rid of wsprintf in favor of snprintf ] +1 for not depending on nonstandard subroutines without need. But please note the standard locution is snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), ... Not sizeof() - 1. Noted. !char*tmppath=0

Re: [PATCHES] Win32: Minimising desktop heap usage

2007-10-23 Thread Dave Page
Tom Lane wrote: [ looks again... ] Actually, I think you just proved my point for me. The ZeroMemory call should go away, no? Yup, quite correct. v3 attached. /D Index: src/backend/port/win32/signal.c === RCS file:

Re: [PATCHES] Win32: Minimising desktop heap usage

2007-10-23 Thread Dave Page
Gregory Stark wrote: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ! /* ! * Note: We use getenv here because the more modern SHGetSpecialFolderPath() ! * will force us to link with shell32.lib which eats valuable desktop heap. ! */ ! tmppath = getenv(APPDATA); Hmm, is

[PATCHES] Additional windows codepages

2007-10-10 Thread Dave Page
The attached patch adds some missing Windows codepage numbers to the table in chklocale.c. Regards, Dave. *** src/port/chklocale.c.orig Wed Oct 3 18:16:39 2007 --- src/port/chklocale.c Wed Oct 10 12:30:05 2007 *** *** 72,97 --- 72,103 {PG_UTF8, UTF-8}, {PG_UTF8,

Re: [PATCHES] OpenSSL Applink

2007-10-01 Thread Dave Page
Magnus Hagander wrote: Yes, that was the problem. Attached patch fixes the problem for me on Windows and Linux using the error mark functionality. It seems a lot cleaner than the other option. Dave - can you test this one? Assuming that works, I'll go ahead and apply it. Yep, looks good

Re: [PATCHES] OpenSSL Applink

2007-09-29 Thread Dave Page
--- Original Message --- From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29/09/07, 01:28:09 Subject: Re: [PATCHES] OpenSSL Applink I concur with Magnus that it'll be better if there's not two code paths here. It's not entirely clear whether BIO_new_fp

Re: [PATCHES] OpenSSL Applink

2007-09-29 Thread Dave Page
Tom Lane wrote: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... It's not entirely clear whether BIO_new_fp() would avoid the problematic calls, but it doesn't look like it'd be hard to try. The last version of the patch I posted uses BIO_new_file() in all cases

[PATCHES] OpenSSL Applink

2007-09-28 Thread Dave Page
On Windows the OpenSSL guys have included code with 0.9.8 and above to allow OpenSSL to work correctly regardless of the MSVC runtime libraries that have been used with the host application. This has become noticable with the MSVC++ build in which any client apps that connect using libpq with a

Re: [PATCHES] OpenSSL Applink

2007-09-28 Thread Dave Page
Andrew Dunstan wrote: Then I think I'd rather disable use of client certs for the offending openssl versions in libpq, or let the apps die and refer the customers to the openssl people to lobby them for a sane solution. If this were 8.0 I'd agree, but thats not a nice solution for those

Re: [PATCHES] OpenSSL Applink

2007-09-28 Thread Dave Page
Andrew Dunstan wrote: Dave Page wrote: I believe we just didn't notice it until now because the older Mingw builds use the MSVC 6.0 runtimes which just happened to be compatible with the OpenSSL binary builds (we're now using 8.0), in addition to which there are relatively few people

Re: [PATCHES] OpenSSL Applink

2007-09-28 Thread Dave Page
Tom Lane wrote: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The server doesn't seem to be affected, but the attached patch fixes the problem for the client apps. Unfortunately it must be included in the app itself, and not libpq. This is pretty much in the category of they've got to be kidding

Re: [PATCHES] OpenSSL Applink

2007-09-28 Thread Dave Page
Heikki Linnakangas wrote: Dave Page wrote: Andrew Dunstan wrote: Dave Page wrote: I believe we just didn't notice it until now because the older Mingw builds use the MSVC 6.0 runtimes which just happened to be compatible with the OpenSSL binary builds (we're now using 8.0), in addition

Re: [PATCHES] OpenSSL Applink

2007-09-28 Thread Dave Page
Marko Kreen wrote: On 9/28/07, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Andrew Dunstan wrote: Then I think I'd rather disable use of client certs for the offending openssl versions in libpq, or let the apps die and refer the customers to the openssl people

Re: [PATCHES] OpenSSL Applink

2007-09-28 Thread Dave Page
Tom Lane wrote: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Andrew Dunstan wrote: Then I think I'd rather disable use of client certs for the offending openssl versions in libpq, or let the apps die and refer the customers to the openssl people to lobby them for a sane solution. If this were 8.0

Re: [PATCHES] OpenSSL Applink

2007-09-28 Thread Dave Page
Tom Lane wrote: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: Doesn't really matter. Even if we were willing to hack our own client apps like that (which I'm not), we can *not* transfer such a requirement onto every libpq-using application. It's just not acceptable. *We're

Re: [PATCHES] OpenSSL Applink

2007-09-28 Thread Dave Page
Dave Page wrote: I did stumble across this text on a mailing list in response to someone with a similar problem in some JNI code. I know little of the OpenSSL API, but perhaps it rings bells with you before I spend my evening trying to figure it out? OK, I think I've figured out a fix

Re: [PATCHES] OpenSSL Applink

2007-09-28 Thread Dave Page
Dave Page wrote: Dave Page wrote: I did stumble across this text on a mailing list in response to someone with a similar problem in some JNI code. I know little of the OpenSSL API, but perhaps it rings bells with you before I spend my evening trying to figure it out? OK, I think I've

Re: [PATCHES] OpenSSL Applink

2007-09-28 Thread Dave Page
Magnus Hagander wrote: Dave Page wrote: Dave Page wrote: Dave Page wrote: I did stumble across this text on a mailing list in response to someone with a similar problem in some JNI code. I know little of the OpenSSL API, but perhaps it rings bells with you before I spend my evening trying

Re: [PATCHES] OpenSSL Applink

2007-09-28 Thread Dave Page
Magnus Hagander wrote: Hrrm. Obviously, I need to go sleep now. Sorry about that. But it'd be nice to get rid of all those #ifdef blocks.. See the attached revision. This is untested as I don't have a linux box to hand, but I believe it's right. /D Index: src/interfaces/libpq/fe-secure.c

Re: [PATCHES] OpenSSL Applink

2007-09-28 Thread Dave Page
Dave Page wrote: Magnus Hagander wrote: Hrrm. Obviously, I need to go sleep now. Sorry about that. But it'd be nice to get rid of all those #ifdef blocks.. See the attached revision. This is untested as I don't have a linux box to hand, but I believe it's right. Ignore that - I managed

Re: [PATCHES] COPYable logs

2007-07-23 Thread Dave Page
Andrew Dunstan wrote: Here is my latest version of this patch. The good news is that it now seems to work on Windows. Please review carefully (esp Magnus, Dave, Tom). Hi Andrew, I've eyeballed the code quite thoroughly and given it a whirl under VC++. The only problem I found was that the

Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump --no-tablespaces patch

2007-07-15 Thread Dave Page
Gavin M. Roy wrote: This is the patch I proposed on hackers to make pg_dump optionally ignore tablespaces. The patch is against 8.2.4. If I should be applying it to CVS head or what not, please let me know (along with any thoughts, concerns or issues). Hi Gavin, It should be against -head

Re: [PATCHES] script binaries renaming

2007-07-07 Thread Dave Page
Michael Glaesemann wrote: On Jul 7, 2007, at 13:50 , Tom Lane wrote: Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dave Page wrote: This is almost as bad as Magnus agreeing with JD (!), but I agree with Peter :-). After years of typing the current names, changing them does seem somewhat

Re: [PATCHES] script binaries renaming

2007-07-06 Thread Dave Page
On Fri, July 6, 2007 8:51 am, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Am Mittwoch, 4. Juli 2007 17:04 schrieb Zdenek Kotala: I attach complete patch which renames following binaries createdb createlang createuser dropdb droplang dropuser clusterdb vacuumdb reindexdb I just want to say I dislike this idea.

Re: [PATCHES] WIP CSV logs

2007-06-29 Thread Dave Page
Andrew Dunstan wrote: Further update attached. Includes some code cleanup, and now sets up a session-id for all processes, including postmaster, syslogger etc, so we can make a primary key on the log table of (session_id, line_number). TODOs: fix on Windows, docs. I'm not going to be able

[PATCHES] pg_ctl -w (wait) option on Windows

2007-06-26 Thread Dave Page
The attached patch implements the following fixes to pg_ctl on Windows: - Fix the -w (wait) option to work in Windows service mode, per bug #3382. This is required on Windows because pg_ctl reports running status to the service control manager when actually still in recovery/startup, causing

[PATCHES] MSVC installation wrapper script

2007-05-01 Thread Dave Page
Per previous discussion with Magnus, the attached batch file (rename to install.bat) is a wrapper script for the MSVC installer. It sets up the environment before installing (to allow zic.exe to run properly), and removes the need to explicitly call perl on the command line. This should be

[PATCHES] Fix for MSVC header installation

2007-04-25 Thread Dave Page
The MSVC installer doesn't install the headers in the same directory structure as the Mingw build. This causes other apps (such as Slony) to fail their configure tests. The attached patch fixes this. Regards, Dave Index: Install.pm

[PATCHES] Fix for MSVC lib installation

2007-04-25 Thread Dave Page
The attached patch installs libpgport.lib under MSVC, and corrects a typo in a message. Regards, Dave Index: Install.pm === RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql/src/tools/msvc/Install.pm,v retrieving revision 1.12 diff -c -r1.12

Re: [PATCHES] Fix for MSVC header installation

2007-04-25 Thread Dave Page
Magnus Hagander wrote: On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 02:57:41PM +0100, Dave Page wrote: The MSVC installer doesn't install the headers in the same directory structure as the Mingw build. This causes other apps (such as Slony) to fail their configure tests. The attached patch fixes this. Applied

Re: [PATCHES] Fix for MSVC header installation

2007-04-25 Thread Dave Page
Andrew Dunstan wrote: Dave Page wrote: Magnus Hagander wrote: On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 02:57:41PM +0100, Dave Page wrote: The MSVC installer doesn't install the headers in the same directory structure as the Mingw build. This causes other apps (such as Slony) to fail their configure tests

Re: [PATCHES] Fix for MSVC header installation

2007-04-25 Thread Dave Page
--- Original Message --- From: Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25/04/07, 22:31:20 Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Fix for MSVC header installation Yup. I had no idea it did that :-) It certainly explains the difference. No, nor I, but it makes sense

Re: [PATCHES] Blocked post

2007-04-02 Thread Dave Page
Bruce Momjian wrote: Simon Riggs wrote: I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm not sure what the problem is? Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00 Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00 What an obvious

Re: [PATCHES] Blocked post

2007-04-02 Thread Dave Page
Bruce Momjian wrote: Dave Page wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Simon Riggs wrote: I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm not sure what the problem is? Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00 Sent: 1

Re: [PATCHES] Re: [DOCS] suggestion for improving TMPDIR and --format docs for pg_dump

2007-03-22 Thread Dave Page
Bruce Momjian wrote: Thanks for the report. I have corrected this and the fix will be in PostgreSQL 8.3. Interestingly, we support non-documented option append and file too. Append is undocumented as it's intended to be used by pg_dumpall, not directly by users. Regards, Dave.

Re: [PATCHES] Re: [DOCS] suggestion for improving TMPDIR and --format docs for pg_dump

2007-03-22 Thread Dave Page
Bruce Momjian wrote: Dave Page wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Thanks for the report. I have corrected this and the fix will be in PostgreSQL 8.3. Interestingly, we support non-documented option append and file too. Append is undocumented as it's intended to be used by pg_dumpall

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] xml2 contrib patch supporting default XML namespaces

2007-03-22 Thread Dave Page
Bruce Momjian wrote: Peter Eisentraut wrote: I was hoping that we're deprecating contrib/xml2, so I wouldn't add more features to it. Author states: I understand that XML support is planned and at least partially implemented for 8.3, but many production instances will be unable (or, in

Re: [pgsql-patches] pg_dumpall -f filename option

2007-01-25 Thread Dave Page
Bruce Momjian wrote: Patch applied. Thanks. Docs updated to mention Win32: Write the output to the specified file. This is particularly useful on Windows because output redirection does not work for child processes. I didn't say that - I said that I couldn't

Re: [pgsql-patches] pg_dumpall default database

2007-01-16 Thread Dave Page
Tom Lane wrote: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: OK, updated patch attached. This has -E dbname or --default-database=dbname Not sure that default database is a particularly helpful adjective; why shouldn't the switch just be --database? Other than that, looks fine. Updated to -l

[pgsql-patches] pg_dumpall -f filename option

2007-01-16 Thread Dave Page
Per discussion on -hackers, the attached patch adds the option -f, --file=FILENAME to pg_dumpall. In order to support this, a new (undocumented) format option (-Fa) is added to pg_dump which is identical to -Fp, except that the output file is opened for append rather than write. This patch

Re: [pgsql-patches] Allow dumping of roles or tablespaces

2007-01-15 Thread Dave Page
Tom Lane wrote: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: pg_dumpall -g -- Dump roles and tablespaces per current behaviour pg_dumpall -gr -- Dump roles only (or users and groups) pg_dumpall -gt -- Dump tablespaces only This seems a bit ugly, mainly because (1) it doesn't have a natural

[pgsql-patches] pg_dumpall default database

2007-01-15 Thread Dave Page
Per discussion on -hackers, the attached patch allow the default database to be specified on the pg_dumpall command line, eg. pg_dumpall [options...] [dbname] If dbname is not specified, postgres/template1 are used per current behaviour. If a connection cannot be made to dbname, an error is

Re: [pgsql-patches] pg_dumpall default database

2007-01-15 Thread Dave Page
Peter Eisentraut wrote: Am Montag, 15. Januar 2007 14:44 schrieb Dave Page: Per discussion on -hackers, the attached patch allow the default database to be specified on the pg_dumpall command line, eg. pg_dumpall [options...] [dbname] I think this should be a separate option. Otherwise

[pgsql-patches] Allow dumping of roles or tablespaces

2007-01-12 Thread Dave Page
Per discussion on -hackers, the attached patch introduces an optional parameter to pg_dumpall's -g (--globals-only) option to allow roles or tablespaces to be dumped on their own. eg. pg_dumpall -g -- Dump roles and tablespaces per current behaviour pg_dumpall -gr -- Dump roles only (or users

Re: [pgsql-patches] Allow dumping of roles or tablespaces

2007-01-12 Thread Dave Page
Andrew Dunstan wrote: Tom Lane wrote: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: pg_dumpall -g -- Dump roles and tablespaces per current behaviour pg_dumpall -gr -- Dump roles only (or users and groups) pg_dumpall -gt -- Dump tablespaces only This seems a bit ugly, mainly because (1

[PATCHES]

2006-11-13 Thread Dave Page
subscribe ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Re: [PATCHES] Tablespace for temporary objects and sort files

2006-10-26 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian Sent: 26 October 2006 14:19 To: Albert Cervera Areny Cc: pgsql-patches@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Tablespace for temporary objects and sort files This has been saved

Re: [PATCHES] Tablespace for temporary objects and sort files

2006-10-26 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 October 2006 14:37 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Dave Page; Albert Cervera Areny; pgsql-patches@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Tablespace for temporary objects and sort files bruce wrote: Dave Page

[PATCHES] contrib/sslinfo fix

2006-09-12 Thread Dave Page
The attached micropatch fixes the README install for contrib/sslinfo. Regards, Dave. sslinfo.diff Description: sslinfo.diff ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [PATCHES] Adding fulldisjunctions to the contrib

2006-08-27 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Jonah H. Harris Sent: Sun 8/27/2006 3:24 AM To: Joshua D. Drake Cc: Andrew Dunstan; Bruce Momjian; Tzahi Fadida; pgsql-patches@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Adding fulldisjunctions to the contrib It's odd, only 10 people

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] BF Failure on Bandicoot

2006-08-21 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 August 2006 20:24 To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Magnus Hagander Cc: Dave Page; pgsql-patches@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] BF Failure on Bandicoot Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [PATCHES] [pgadmin-hackers] Adminpack contrib module

2006-05-09 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrus Sent: 08 May 2006 18:16 To: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Adminpack contrib module There were no objections, so attached is an updated version of the

Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Have configure complain about unknown options

2006-05-05 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marko Kreen Sent: 05 May 2006 12:22 To: Tom Lane Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout; pgsql-patches@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Have configure complain about unknown options As

[PATCHES] Adminpack contrib module

2006-05-04 Thread Dave Page
A few weeks ago following a discussion on pgsql-general it was proposed that the pgAdmin 'adminpack' contrib module be added to /contrib in the server's source tree to make it easier for users to find and install. There were no objections, so attached is an updated version of the adminpack, with

Re: [PATCHES] Building with Visual C++

2006-04-24 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Lane Sent: 24 April 2006 21:57 To: Magnus Hagander Cc: Chuck McDevitt; pgsql-patches@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Building with Visual C++ We'll need a VC buildfarm member in place

[PATCHES] Xml2 on Windows

2006-03-10 Thread Dave Page
xml2.patch The attached patch fixes the xml2 contrib module for windows, by changing the order of -lxslt -lxml2 (yes, after 2 releases that's all it took!). Tested on Windows Linux. It might be worth manually testing this on any other platforms that might be sensitive to the library order -

Re: [PATCHES] display and expression of the home directory in Win32

2006-01-06 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Eisentraut Sent: 06 January 2006 11:07 To: pgsql-patches@postgresql.org Cc: Hiroshi Saito Subject: Re: [PATCHES] display and expression of the home directory in Win32 Am Freitag, 6.

Re: [PATCHES] CVS of 8.1.x MS-VC6 probrem.

2005-12-09 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Lane Sent: 09 December 2005 14:01 To: Hiroshi Saito Cc: Magnus Hagander; Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-patches Subject: Re: [PATCHES] CVS of 8.1.x MS-VC6 probrem. Hiroshi Saito [EMAIL

Re: [PATCHES] CVS of 8.1.x MS-VC6 probrem.

2005-12-09 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 December 2005 14:33 To: Dave Page Cc: Hiroshi Saito; Magnus Hagander; Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-patches Subject: Re: [PATCHES] CVS of 8.1.x MS-VC6 probrem. Dave Page dpage@vale-housing.co.uk writes: As one

Re: [PATCHES] Numeric 508 datatype

2005-11-17 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua D. Drake Sent: 17 November 2005 15:58 To: Andreas Pflug Cc: Tom Lane; Simon Riggs; pgsql-patches@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Numeric 508 datatype Hm, so if this patch is

Re: [PATCHES] drop if exists

2005-11-14 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Glaesemann Sent: 14 November 2005 14:54 To: Andrew Dunstan Cc: Patches (PostgreSQL) Subject: Re: [PATCHES] drop if exists On Nov 14, 2005, at 23:25 , Andrew Dunstan wrote: Ther

Re: [PATCHES] Fix for file names with spaces

2005-10-05 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 October 2005 16:31 To: Dave Page Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-patches Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Fix for file names with spaces Dave Page dpage@vale-housing.co.uk writes: Why does this patch convert

Re: [PATCHES] Fix for file names with spaces

2005-10-05 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 October 2005 16:08 To: Bruce Momjian Cc: PostgreSQL-patches; Dave Page Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Fix for file names with spaces Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes: Sorry, this is the same patch

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] External Sort timing debug statements

2005-10-03 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Lane Sent: 03 October 2005 15:37 To: Simon Riggs Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; pgsql-patches@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] External Sort timing debug statements

Re: [PATCHES] Making pgxs builds work with a relocated installation

2005-10-02 Thread Dave Page
builds work with a relocated installation Dave Page dpage@vale-housing.co.uk writes: Unfortunately quoting either way didn't work on Windows/msys when Thomas I were looking at this. Yech. So we need the GetShortName hack on Windows even if we quote for other platforms? Yep :-(. /D

Re: [PATCHES] Making pgxs builds work with a relocated installation

2005-10-01 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01/10/05 16:28:18 To: Bruce Momjianpgman@candle.pha.pa.us Cc: Dave Pagedpage@vale-housing.co.uk, Peter Eisentraut[EMAIL PROTECTED], PostgreSQL-patchespgsql-patches@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Making pgxs builds work with a

[PATCHES] Bug in file access functions

2005-08-29 Thread Dave Page
The attached patch fixes a couple of minor issues in the file access functions added for 8.1. These seem to have been introduced in recent changes following the original patch. 1) Stop them rejecting paths that use Windows backslash directory seperators. 2) Allow absolute paths to files into the

Re: [PATCHES] Bug in file access functions

2005-08-29 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 August 2005 20:15 To: Dave Page Cc: PostgreSQL-patches Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Bug in file access functions Dave Page dpage@vale-housing.co.uk writes: 1) Stop them rejecting paths that use Windows backslash

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support

2005-08-25 Thread Dave Page
It, or some related patch appears to have broken the build on buildfarm member snake. I haven't had time to investigate. /D -Original Message- From: Bruce Momjianpgman@candle.pha.pa.us Sent: 25/08/05 01:14:54 To: Tom Lane[EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Andrew Dunstan[EMAIL PROTECTED], Chuck

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch

2005-08-01 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2005 03:26 To: Dave Page Cc: PostgreSQL-patches Subject: Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch Dave Page wrote: [Resent as the list seems to have rejected yesterdays attempt

[PATCHES] Win32 Thread Safety

2005-08-01 Thread Dave Page
The attached patch updates the thread test program to run stand-alone on Windows. The test itself is bypassed in configure as discussed, and libpq has been updated appropriately to allow it to build in thread-safe mode. To apply, apply the patch as normal, then rename

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch

2005-08-01 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2005 14:47 To: Dave Page Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-patches Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch Dave Page wrote: -Original Message

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch

2005-08-01 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2005 15:05 To: Dave Page Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-patches Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch Dave Page wrote: pg_dir_ls isn't necessary

Re: [PATCHES] Updated instrumentation patch

2005-07-30 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Tom Lane Sent: Sat 7/30/2005 4:58 PM To: Magnus Hagander Cc: PostgreSQL-patches Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Updated instrumentation patch None of these functions are getting into 8.1 anyway; we should be designing the long-term

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration

2005-07-06 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 July 2005 04:11 To: Tom Lane Cc: Dave Page; Christopher Kings-Lynne; Robert Treat; Dawid Kuroczko; Andreas Pflug; PostgreSQL-patches; PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Dbsize backend

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration

2005-07-04 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 July 2005 17:10 To: Dawid Kuroczko Cc: Andreas Pflug; Dave Page; Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-patches; PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Dawid Kuroczko [EMAIL

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration

2005-07-04 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Robert Treat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 July 2005 18:21 To: Dave Page Cc: Tom Lane; Dawid Kuroczko; Andreas Pflug; Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-patches; PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration

Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration

2005-07-02 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 July 2005 21:30 To: Bruce Momjian Cc: Dave Page; PostgreSQL-patches; PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Is a new version of this patch coming? Yup, attached. Per

Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration

2005-06-30 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 June 2005 12:46 To: Dave Page Cc: PostgreSQL-patches; PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration I have a new idea --- pg_storage_size(). I'm not against that one, but I

Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration

2005-06-30 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 June 2005 10:29 To: Bruce Momjian; Dave Page Cc: PostgreSQL-patches; PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Maybe pg_trait_size() or pg_property_size() will do? I

  1   2   >