On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Adrian Lienhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anything important we missed? Any suggestions?
- review pharo-dev images and make comments so that the official Pharo
image contains some dev tools and pharo-dev becomes useless.
--
Damien Cassou
Peter von der
Hi Adrian,
Adrian Lienhard wrote:
Concerning terminology, I suggest to name the official Pharo image,
which will be packaged as a one-click image, Pharo-IDE. And the one
where the actual development of Pharo takes place is named Pharo-CORE.
Using DEV is ambiguous because its not clear
2008/11/3 Adrian Lienhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
thanks, I forgot to list the one-click image. I added the plan to
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Milestones
Concerning terminology, I suggest to name the official Pharo image, which
will be packaged as a one-click image, Pharo-IDE. And the one
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Adrian Lienhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Concerning terminology, I suggest to name the official Pharo image, which
will be packaged as a one-click image, Pharo-IDE. And the one where the
actual development of Pharo takes place is named Pharo-CORE. Using DEV is
http://www.nwiresoftware.com/
screencast:
http://www.nwiresoftware.com/sites/nwiresoftware.com/video.php?file=/sites/nwiresoftware.com/files/video/nwire-intro.flv
--
Damien Cassou
Peter von der Ahé: «I'm beginning to see why Gilad wished us good
luck».
Hi,
This is the issue 129
Cheers,
Gwenael
On 11/1/08 9:42 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
Hi Gwenael,
In PharoInbox there is the following slice, but I don't know which issue
it corresponds to (please always add the issue number in the slice
comment or file name)?
Cheers,
Adrian
Name:
Why not to have Pharo-standard and Pharo-Enterprise ?
The idea is that the version *with* the tools is the standard. Not
the one without. ;-)
What about Pharo-minimal and Pharo-enterprise?
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel
On 03.11.2008, at 15:52, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Why not to have Pharo-standard and Pharo-Enterprise ?
The idea is that the version *with* the tools is the standard. Not
the one without. ;-)
What about Pharo-minimal and Pharo-enterprise?
I vote for Pharo-Core and Pharo.
During ESUG, we discussed about that with Marcus. IIRC, he wanted the
current pharo-dev (your Pharo-IDE) to be named just Pharo. The core,
which should only be used by people knowing what they do would be
named Pharo-core.
I agree, in my humble opinion it seems to be the best choice.
Francois
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Marcus Denker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I vote for Pharo-Core and Pharo.
So do I
--
Damien Cassou
Peter von der Ahé: «I'm beginning to see why Gilad wished us good
luck». (http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override_snafu)
Francois,
Welcome to the list! +1 on the naming scheme.
Bill
Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D.
University of Florida
Department of Anesthesiology
PO Box 100254
Gainesville, FL 32610-0254
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: (352) 273-6785
FAX: (352) 392-7029
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/03/08 9:56 AM
During
On 03.11.2008, at 10:55, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
2008/11/3 Adrian Lienhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
thanks, I forgot to list the one-click image. I added the plan to
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Milestones
Concerning terminology, I suggest to name the official Pharo image,
which
will be
ok, then, let's take Pharo-Core and Pharo.
Adrian
On Nov 3, 2008, at 17:07 , Ramon Leon wrote:
Marcus Denker wrote:
I vote for Pharo-Core and Pharo.
+0.9
Pharo-Core and Pharo-Dev (+0.1)
Michael
Ditto, I like Core and Dev better, but Pharo-Core and Pharo aren't bad
either.
Ramon Leon
On 03.11.2008, at 15:44, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Yes good idea, to have 2 differents names, but why Pharo-IDE ? There
is no IDE in the core version ?
There is only a minimal one, and it will be further reduced in the
future. So, for real work, it is suggested to use the IDE image,
which
http://www.ohloh.net/projects/linux/analyses/latest
___
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Yes good idea, to have 2 differents names, but why Pharo-IDE ? There
is no IDE in the core version ?
There is only a minimal one, and it will be further reduced in the
future. So, for real work, it is suggested to use the IDE image,
which includes all the productivity tools like
I like that, too :)DoruOn Nov 3, 2008, at 5:32 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote:ok, then, let's take Pharo-Core and Pharo.AdrianOn Nov 3, 2008, at 17:07 , Ramon Leon wrote:Marcus Denker wrote:I vote for Pharo-Core and Pharo.+0.9Pharo-Core and Pharo-Dev (+0.1)MichaelDitto, I like Core and Dev better, but
I suggest to have at least one next image - without everything what can be
safely unloaded. For the next cleaning and shrinking purposes.
Of course if you want to have similar sequence of automatically build images
like the KernelImage.
-- Pavel
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Adrian Lienhard
Adrian Lienhard ha scritto:
On Nov 3, 2008, at 10:55 , Serge Stinckwich wrote:
Why not Pharo-stable and Pharo-unstable ?
because there exists a stable CORE too. Changes are done on the core and
from this the IDE is then built.
I hope this helps to explain the rationale behind the
-9 lines? did I read that right?
Mike
___
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Maybe some comment using ... are present in the code that is ignored
for some reason from the compiler.
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 3 Nov 2008, at 19:16, Michael Roberts wrote:
-9 lines? did I read that right?
Mike
___
Pharo-project mailing list
Excellent David,
Alexandre
On 29 Oct 2008, at 17:38, David Röthlisberger wrote:
Are you updating loadSuperOB? Or shall I do it?
I'm just right now in the process of doing it. ;)
There is ScriptLoader-DavidRoethlisberger.594 in PharoInbox
providing a working version of #loadSuperOB and
2008/11/3 Adrian Lienhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ok, then, let's take Pharo-Core and Pharo.
+1
--
Serge Stinckwich
IRD - UR 079 Geodes, MSI Team, Hanoi, Vietnam
Smalltalkers do: [:it | All with: Class, (And love: it)]
http://doesnotunderstand.org/
___
Alexandre Bergel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maybe some comment using ... are present in the code that is ignored
for some reason from the compiler.
Cheers,
Alexandre
On 3 Nov 2008, at 19:16, Michael Roberts wrote:
-9 lines? did I read that right?
Mike
24 matches
Mail list logo
