Hi list:
I'm trying to load LatexMorph and I get the following dependency message.
This package depends on the following classes:
Player
You must resolve these dependencies before you will be able to load these
definitions:
PlayergetCode
PlayergetDPI
PlayergetImage
PlayergetTemplate
You can't, since Player has been removed and there's no plans for
bringing it back..
However, that also means you don't really need those methods, if you
browse them, you can see they're really only utility methods for
setting the properties of a LatexMorph from a player.
So to load in
Thanks for your answer.
I do not know what a DNU is, but your suggestion worked.
What is the procedure now to fix this package?
The Pharo version should remove the dependecy, but the Squeak version might
want to keep it. What is the policy in Pharo when this happens?
I'm mailing in the signed
I'd suggest splitting it into two packages, one containing the core
LatexMorphic - code, and one containing Etoys-specific extensions to
player.
(Basically one package for each of the class categories in the current
LatexMorph-package).
Cheers,
Henry
PS: Maybe it's just me, but I often
LatexUnix, on its class side, has the following:
LatexUnix Class isResponsibleForThisPlatform
^ ExternalUnixOSProcess isResponsibleForThisPlatform
ExternalUnixOSProcess is not present on my system (using OSX).
Any hints on how to find this class?
Thanks!
--
View this message in
Try loading the package in:
http://www.squeaksource.com/OSProcess
Cheers,
Henry
On Nov 9, 2009, at 11:41 54AM, alesch wrote:
LatexUnix, on its class side, has the following:
LatexUnix Class isResponsibleForThisPlatform
^ ExternalUnixOSProcess isResponsibleForThisPlatform
Is there a way of marking what packages are ok to load into Pharo?
Henrik Sperre Johansen wrote:
I'd suggest splitting it into two packages, one containing the core
LatexMorphic - code, and one containing Etoys-specific extensions to
player.
(Basically one package for each of the
I believe the plan is for people to provide Metacello-configurations
for loading different packages (prerequisites, version numbers, etc,
basically the same as Sake), have the automated buildsystem test which
actually work, and build a list for which a browser can be made based
on those.
11037
-
Issue 1418: clean Morph#okayToDuplicate
Issue 571: unnecessary temporary variable assignment
Issue 1419: remove convertNovember2000DropShadow...
Issue 1420: remove methods of old (non-Eliot) closures
Issue 1423: not Installed CompiledMethod have invalid
Hello all,
I am trying to be a good tester, and have been shot in the foot now for a
couple of days. That's no great loss, but a similar set of circumstances could
be very ugly in the future. My ailing build process for RC1 is thwarted by
source.squeakfoundation.org's being offline. Imagine
There is no need for urgent action (this is only a drillg), but there
should be some redundancy in where the code is stored, and MC should not
prevent my saving code I already have to my local drive. There isn't (at
least not that I can find), and it does :(
Parse error.
Monticello is a
Hi Bill,
At netstyle.ch and Cmsbox we have the rule that all projects have to
be completely loadable from our own MC repository. I suggest to do the
same for the reasons you mention below. You never know what happens to
external resources...
Storing a local copy with MC should not be a
2009/11/9 Lukas Renggli reng...@gmail.com:
There is no need for urgent action (this is only a drillg), but there
should be some redundancy in where the code is stored, and MC should not
prevent my saving code I already have to my local drive. There isn't (at
least not that I can find), and
Lukas,
The whole server is down, and MC (at least out of the box and with some help
from ScriptLoader) comes uglued over it. I don't blame the servers; I *do*
blame the design. Adrian seems to have the defects and the workaround in mind.
Bill
-Original Message-
From:
If i understanding the problem clearly, MC checks the current contents
of all repositories, defined for package,
before saving a package, even locally.
No. Monticello saves into the selected repository and into the local
package-cache only. This is the same as you get with Git (and other
Lukas Renggli wrote:
There is no need for urgent action (this is only a drillg), but there
should be some redundancy in where the code is stored, and MC should not
prevent my saving code I already have to my local drive. There isn't (at
least not that I can find), and it does :(
Parse
Adrian,
You are correct, it does contain them (thanks for mentioning that). Saving my
own copies _is_ a problem, but fortunately I do not need to do so.
How do you enforce local loads? Do you insist on downloading everything
yourselves, or do you have some type of lazy download with cancel
Michael,
Good point. Without starting a flame war, I find it necessary to give a big +1
to Pharo (the system and the people behind it) - I doubt I would be this far
along in a move to Squeak.
Servers quit (especially Windows boxesg), routers fail, and ISPs have bad
days. The external world
2009/11/9 Lukas Renggli reng...@gmail.com:
If i understanding the problem clearly, MC checks the current contents
of all repositories, defined for package,
before saving a package, even locally.
No. Monticello saves into the selected repository and into the local
package-cache only. This is
As an FYI... for those using Metacello...
In Metacello you can arrange to override the repositories used for loading ...
useful in cases where servers are down or offline/not accessible for other
reasons ...saves you from having to edit configurations ...
I use the override for creating a
That is a valuable feature. When/how does it make the decision that overrides
are needed? Does it timeout and fail-over on each attempt? That could get
painful to watch, or could be problematic on slow connections.
Bill
-Original Message-
From:
What I would like especially when coding in the train is that my
script using a given repository
can use my local cache. I know that Installer did not support that.
Lukas is gofer supporting that behavior?
Stef
On Nov 9, 2009, at 9:06 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
We don't have any automated
Bill,
You add the overrides to the loader for a version, so you'd use the overrides
in an emergency or when you wanted to explicitly use a different
repositoryIt's literally an override - when used all packages are loaded
from the override repositories.
Instead of launching a load with
Hi guys
I wanted to remove the deprecated methods of 1.0 in 1.1
Here is a first cut of deprecated methods that are not called by other
in the system.
May be we should not integrate it now but create a slice that people
could load if they want.
RemovingDeprecatedMethods.2.cs
Description:
Nice!
I wanted to remove the deprecated methods of 1.0 in 1.1
Here is a first cut of deprecated methods that are not called by
other in the system.
This means that there are deprecated methods called by existing
methods in the image? That should not be the case...
May be we should not
Hi
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1432
I wanted to remove this method but there is one sender I will fix. Now
which one is correct asString or asText.
toText
self deprecated: 'Use UrlasText instead'.
^ self asString.
Stef
here is a new version removing one test.
RemovingDeprecatedMethods.3.cs
Description: Binary data
On Nov 9, 2009, at 10:01 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
Nice!
I wanted to remove the deprecated methods of 1.0 in 1.1
Here is a first cut of deprecated methods that are not called by
other in
the assignment operator should be integrated as soon as
possible in order to give the packager time to fix their code so that
as soon as lukas pushes it into the inbox we integrate it.
Stef
On Nov 9, 2009, at 10:06 PM, Miguel Enrique Cobá Martinez wrote:
El lun, 09-11-2009 a las
El lun, 09-11-2009 a las 21:54 +0100, Stéphane Ducasse escribió:
Hi guys
I wanted to remove the deprecated methods of 1.0 in 1.1
Here is a first cut of deprecated methods that are not called by other
in the system.
May be we should not integrate it now but create a slice that people
Hi Lukas,
found the same problem again in a MCMergeBrowser
There are pure Symbols and Symbol asText in the list of changes.
This list of changes is computed in
MCPatchBrowserlist
^ self items collect: [:ea | ea summary]
In my case, the second element of the list was a
Monticello is a distributed versioning system, so it is highly
redundant by definition. You can't really blame anybody else if a
version your are interested in is not reachable. I usually copy
important code into my local repository.
Well, on the other hand it is extremely bad publicity if
the assignment operator should be integrated as soon as
possible in order to give the packager time to fix their code so that
as soon as lukas pushes it into the inbox we integrate it.
The thing is that there is a setting in the preferences that confused
me. It currently has no
I cannot reproduce the problem. There must be a different cause in
your image, which is the root of the problem and should be fixed.
In all my images all Text object contain only Strings:
Text allInstances reject: [ :each | each string isString ]
-- #()
Text allInstances select: [ :each
Lukas Renggli wrote:
I don't know what is hosted on source.squeakfoundation.org and who is
maintaining it.
You are not quite getting the point.
As long as Pharo relies on *anything* hosted on unreliable servers
hosted by anyone the bad PR falls back on the Pharo community.
And if I would
Maybe you can find the creator of the Text instances with Text inside
by modifying Text#setString:setRuns:?
TextsetString: aString setRuns: anArray
(aString isText)
ifTrue: [ self haltOnce ].
string := aString.
runs := anArray
Don't forget to enable the
I don't know what is hosted on source.squeakfoundation.org and who is
maintaining it.
You are not quite getting the point.
As long as Pharo relies on *anything* hosted on unreliable servers
hosted by anyone the bad PR falls back on the Pharo community.
You are also not getting the point.
Michael,
Please hold that thought on marketing. In fairness, the problem is not so much
that Pharo relies on an unreliable server (which might not even be the case -
being down now and being down a lot are two different things) as it is that
the package management tools (at least as far as I
Hello all,
With a couple of changes, I am free of the non-responsive server and still
having trouble. On one run, I saw something about recompiling system
dictionary (no promises of an exact quote as it flashed by quickly) followed
by the emergency evaluator that won't do anything. I added
If you don't follow the squeak list, then you won't know they install
the patches from 2007
to fix the problem, although there are some thoughts now what about
patches from later in 2007 2008?
Hopefully this kicks off some reflection in their infrastructure
support teams about why some
Stéphane Ducasse a écrit :
Hi guys
I wanted to remove the deprecated methods of 1.0 in 1.1
Here is a first cut of deprecated methods that are not called by other
in the system.
May be we should not integrate it now but create a slice that people
could load if they want.
I think that we
40 matches
Mail list logo
