Re: [Pharo-project] Merging one-click and pharo-dev

2008-10-28 Thread Marcus Denker
On 27.10.2008, at 20:29, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: I do not know. Looks ok, just one minor change, the bundle version in the info.plist reads 3.8.18b1U, but it should read 3.8.18b4U I note this app doesn't have the freetype plugins for any platforms, are they needed? Or is that a pending

Re: [Pharo-project] Merging one-click and pharo-dev

2008-10-27 Thread John M McIntosh
Looks ok, just one minor change, the bundle version in the info.plist reads 3.8.18b1U, but it should read 3.8.18b4U I note this app doesn't have the freetype plugins for any platforms, are they needed? Or is that a pending feature awaiting for font work in the pharo image? On Oct 27, 2008,

Re: [Pharo-project] Merging one-click and pharo-dev

2008-10-27 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
I do not know. Looks ok, just one minor change, the bundle version in the info.plist reads 3.8.18b1U, but it should read 3.8.18b4U I note this app doesn't have the freetype plugins for any platforms, are they needed? Or is that a pending feature awaiting for font work in the pharo image?

Re: [Pharo-project] Merging one-click and pharo-dev

2008-10-23 Thread John M McIntosh
Ok, seems to work on the macintosh. However it's a 3.8.18b1U you should use a 3.8.18b4U VM when you copy over the vm and rename the Squeak VM Opt to squeak please also copy over the Squeak VM Opt.sig to Squeak.sig That is a pgp signature file which is helpful in determining where the binary

Re: [Pharo-project] Merging one-click and pharo-dev

2008-10-23 Thread Damien Cassou
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 8:51 AM, John M McIntosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However it's a 3.8.18b1U you should use a 3.8.18b4U VM Where can I find this VM please? I tried ftp://ftp.smalltalkconsulting.com/ but could not find the particular files you are talking about. Moreover, it seems a lot of

Re: [Pharo-project] Merging one-click and pharo-dev

2008-10-23 Thread Bill Schwab
Damien, Is the Linux VM dated? It did not prompt to save before quitting. IIRC, an earlier one-click had that feature. Bill Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D. University of Florida Department of Anesthesiology PO Box 100254 Gainesville, FL 32610-0254 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: (352) 273-6785

Re: [Pharo-project] Merging one-click and pharo-dev

2008-10-23 Thread Damien Cassou
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Bill Schwab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is the Linux VM dated? It did not prompt to save before quitting. IIRC, an earlier one-click had that feature. I didn't change anything from Marcus' one-click from http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Downloads?tm=2 but the

Re: [Pharo-project] Merging one-click and pharo-dev

2008-10-23 Thread Bill Schwab
Damien, This is spooky - none of them seem to work now. I tried the two one-click images you mentioned and the Polymorph-TT demo. This is strange, because I remember seeing it work, and I'm fairly certain it was a one-click. Hmmm I am not at 100% right now (fighting a cold), but a

Re: [Pharo-project] Merging one-click and pharo-dev

2008-10-22 Thread Lukas Renggli
Then, you can embed the latest one into a One-Click that you generate (it seems I can't generate them myself because I don't use MacOS, but I'm not sure). Don't know if you need macos, could be. (never tried it on linux). In general it would be nice to be able to build the one-click

Re: [Pharo-project] Merging one-click and pharo-dev

2008-10-22 Thread Damien Cassou
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Marcus Denker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In general it would be nice to be able to build the one-click programmatically. There should be a one-click package-generator in the image. It should be easy in Bash, I can try. However, I don't know how it can be done in

Re: [Pharo-project] Merging one-click and pharo-dev

2008-10-22 Thread Keith Hodges
Lukas Renggli wrote: However if you are using linux then you should be fine, the Squeak.app is just a folder with a bunch of files/folders. It would be good to have a SakeTask for generating one click images, that can be incorporated into Bob. Keith

Re: [Pharo-project] Merging one-click and pharo-dev

2008-10-22 Thread John M McIntosh
That is preserving any resource fork, and meta-data from hfs file attributes. Also so retains the hidden file that is used by the finder to format the folder view. It doesn't need to be present I believe in order for the re-zipped app to run, however I'd just keep it for now. After you

Re: [Pharo-project] Merging one-click and pharo-dev

2008-10-22 Thread Damien Cassou
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 9:58 PM, John M McIntosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That is preserving any resource fork, and meta-data from hfs file attributes. Also so retains the hidden file that is used by the finder to format the folder view. It doesn't need to be present I believe in order for

[Pharo-project] Merging one-click and pharo-dev

2008-10-21 Thread Damien Cassou
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Marcus Denker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We should really think/discuss about the next one-click be based on the dev image (the non-one-click then will be the core image for people building deployment images, for example). First, you have to comment on the

Re: [Pharo-project] Merging one-click and pharo-dev

2008-10-21 Thread Damien Cassou
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:55 PM, David Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Which is easier, loading dev tools into TrueType/Polymorph or loading TrueType/Polymorph into dev? I don't know but I guess future one-click will contain the dev tools, TrueType fonts and Polymorph. -- Damien Cassou