On 16.08.2011 19:51, Igor Stasenko wrote:
Hello,
i know that we're already having #deprecated: , #deprecated: on: in: etc
but one thing what i think useful about annotations that it is a way
to indicate that method is deprecated without showing a warning.
The problem with using
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011, Philippe Marschall wrote:
On 16.08.2011 19:51, Igor Stasenko wrote:
Hello,
i know that we're already having #deprecated: , #deprecated: on: in: etc
but one thing what i think useful about annotations that it is a way
to indicate that method is deprecated without showing
On 17 August 2011 14:23, Lukas Renggli reng...@gmail.com wrote:
What you think?
How would that help anybody to find out whether they are relying on
deprecated methods? This seems like a big step backwards form a user
point of view. Suddenly a method is gone and you didn't get a warning.
You
On 17.08.2011 14:24, Igor Stasenko wrote:
On 17 August 2011 14:14, Philippe Marschall kus...@gmx.net wrote:
On 16.08.2011 19:51, Igor Stasenko wrote:
Hello,
i know that we're already having #deprecated: , #deprecated: on: in: etc
but one thing what i think useful about annotations that it
On 17 August 2011 14:26, Levente Uzonyi le...@elte.hu wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011, Philippe Marschall wrote:
On 16.08.2011 19:51, Igor Stasenko wrote:
Hello,
i know that we're already having #deprecated: , #deprecated: on: in: etc
but one thing what i think useful about annotations that it
How would that help anybody to find out whether they are relying on
deprecated methods? This seems like a big step backwards form a user
point of view. Suddenly a method is gone and you didn't get a warning.
You are you supposed to check for deprecated methods? Debug each and
every one of
On Aug 17, 2011, at 2:40 34PM, Lukas Renggli wrote:
How would that help anybody to find out whether they are relying on
deprecated methods? This seems like a big step backwards form a user
point of view. Suddenly a method is gone and you didn't get a warning.
You are you supposed to check
Hi Lukas, Igor
2011/8/17 Lukas Renggli reng...@gmail.com:
How would that help anybody to find out whether they are relying on
deprecated methods? This seems like a big step backwards form a user
point of view. Suddenly a method is gone and you didn't get a warning.
You are you supposed to
On 17.08.2011 16:05, Hernán Morales Durand wrote:
Hi Lukas, Igor
2011/8/17 Lukas Renggli reng...@gmail.com:
How would that help anybody to find out whether they are relying on
deprecated methods? This seems like a big step backwards form a user
point of view. Suddenly a method is gone and
Hello,
i know that we're already having #deprecated: , #deprecated: on: in: etc
but one thing what i think useful about annotations that it is a way
to indicate that method is deprecated without showing a warning.
The problem with using messages, that if you deprecate something which
used quite
Currently i run upon this situation, when annotation is the only
possible choice:
SmalltalkImagevmParameterAt: parameterIndex
This method is deprecated.
We're not putting a #deprecated: message here, because then it will
produce a lot of warnings
Ok you won! But we want a nice comment in all deprecated methods :)
Stef
On Aug 16, 2011, at 7:55 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
Currently i run upon this situation, when annotation is the only
possible choice:
SmalltalkImagevmParameterAt: parameterIndex
This method is deprecated.
12 matches
Mail list logo
