[Phono-L] Cosmetic phono restoration tip

2010-01-01 Thread Andrew Baron
The following was initially intended to be a reply to the Bakelite polishing subject, but it's far-reaching enough that I changed the subject line. One of the best polishes I've discovered recently, that's almost miraculous in its effect (and yet uses no slimy additives), is Meguiar's

Re: [Phono-L] 1904 Edison Triumph with Automatic Reproducer

2010-01-01 Thread clockworkhome
I stand corrected, the seller sent me an email telling me that at the end of the Model As Edison just threw any and all parts together to clear the stocks! I guess he did not know that the Model As went for some time after the machine he has. The Model A ended around 51000. Of special

Re: [Phono-L] Hello

2010-01-01 Thread Bruce Mercer
Hello Bill and welcome to the best group on the subject. BTWwhat car? I missed what it was but am also afflicted along those lines. Bruce ___ Phono-L mailing list http://phono-l.oldcrank.org

Re: [Phono-L] The last word on Diamond Discs...I think

2010-01-01 Thread Steven Medved
They will play on a regular 78 rpm modern turntable with 78 setting. They do not sound their best that way but with the light stylus weight I do not think wear or damage would be an issue. I welcome other comments, especially from those who have special modern equipment to play them with.

Re: [Phono-L] 1904 Edison Triumph with Automatic Reproducer

2010-01-01 Thread Steven Medved
Dear Al, The triumph cost $50 when $5 a day for wages was a good salary. Who would pay for and why would Edison sell in 1904 a machine with an outdated, poorly sounding reproducer. Also why would he have an automatic from 1898 and a carriage from early 1902 (or earlier) on a

Re: [Phono-L] The last word on Diamond Discs...I think

2010-01-01 Thread Andrew Baron
Sounds like you made the right decision to abandon this one. Andy On Dec 31, 2009, at 3:39 AM, ger wrote: The machine is gone. If a table model is 70 lbs, the London must have weighed well over a 100 lbs. I could not even lift one side. It was way too heavy for me to realistically deal

[Phono-L] Shipping phonographs

2010-01-01 Thread Steven Medved
I highly recommend if anyone purchases a phono that the seller says will be sent UPS, ask them to send it Fed Ex ground. I have had 2 triumphs and an order of auto parts damaged by UPS. UPS is wonderful for small, light parts, but larger ones seem to get dropper or crushed by their automatic

Re: [Phono-L] 1904 Edison Triumph with Automatic Reproducer

2010-01-01 Thread Jim Nichol
Steve, I am not sure that you picked up on Al's sarcasm about the seller's reply. Jim Nichol On Jan 1, 2010, at 3:22 PM, Steven Medved wrote: Dear Al, The triumph cost $50 when $5 a day for wages was a good salary. Who would pay for and why would Edison sell in 1904 a machine with an

Re: [Phono-L] Shipping phonographs

2010-01-01 Thread Mike Stitt
UPS should be last resort. I was told FED EX still handles most packages by hand. I took that to mean that they don't drop from conveyor belt to conveyor belt. The post office does a great job and is much faster than both of the private carriers. The Snap On tool guy gets his deliveries at my

Re: [Phono-L] Shipping phonographs

2010-01-01 Thread The Farmers
I agree with this too. Although I'm not sure that it's easier to collect from FedEx since I've never had any damage from them to find out. FedEx also has much shorter lines to stand in for some strange reason. Greg Farmer - Original Message - From: Steven Medved steve_nor...@msn.com

[Phono-L] For sale

2010-01-01 Thread Vince C.
Hi All, I posted this before Christmas but not sure if it got through. So here it is again. If interested I am open to reasonable offers. Please follow the link for pictures and email directly with questions. http://home.comcast.net/~vtm12/sale/sale.html Below is a very brief description

Re: [Phono-L] Shipping phonographs

2010-01-01 Thread Bill Boruff
Steve- FedEx does not always use kid gloves when handling packages. During this past year I shipped a banner front Edison Home in 3 boxes with each carefully packed to withstand any rough handling. One box was for the case, one for the mechanism and one for the horn. The mechanism was

Re: [Phono-L] Shipping phonographs

2010-01-01 Thread Abe Feder
Hi All, I hate to tell all of you this but there is no magic bullet. I have been in the art business for 35 years and have used FedX , UPS and others and the fact is that you gotta build a box that will take just about any form of bad treatment. One of my nephews grew up working 1st for FedX -4