Re: [PHP] Re: isset question

2009-06-18 Thread LAMP
Gary wrote: This is what I have now and it works. I do know that on the second line I have $_POST['mort']}\n : ; in the second half. I'm not sure I understand the comment about use the !empty if you dont care about PHP. if you don't care about PHP Notice... eror_reporting:

Re: [PHP] Re: isset question

2009-06-18 Thread Martin Scotta
error_reporting( E_ALL | E_STRICT ); if you want to be extremely sure about your app (only in develop) On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 5:04 PM, LAMP l...@afan.net wrote: Gary wrote: This is what I have now and it works. I do know that on the second line I have $_POST['mort']}\n : ; in the second

Re: [PHP] Re: isset question

2009-06-18 Thread LAMP
Martin Scotta wrote: error_reporting( E_ALL | E_STRICT ); if you want to be extremely sure about your app (only in develop) Actually, I use error_reporting(E_ALL) while developing :-) Afan On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 5:04 PM, LAMP l...@afan.net mailto:l...@afan.net wrote: Gary wrote:

Re: [PHP] Re: isset($a-b) even if $a-b = null

2007-08-17 Thread Olav Mørkrid
the solution has been found. array_key_exists() can actually be used on objects, and yields the correct result. http://no.php.net/array_key_exists thanks to dordea cosmin for pointing this out. On 17/08/07, Olav Mørkrid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the test i need should give the following

Re: [PHP] Re: isset($a-b) even if $a-b = null

2007-08-17 Thread Michael Preslar
Found something. For class variables.. http://us.php.net/manual/en/function.property-exists.php class a { var $b; } if (property_exists('a','b')) { print yes\n; } On 8/17/07, Olav Mørkrid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the test i need should give the following results: - FALSE when $a-b

Re: [PHP] Re: isset($a-b) even if $a-b = null

2007-08-17 Thread Olav Mørkrid
yes, but that assumes you have a defined class. if $a comes from mysql_fetch_object() for instance you have just a stdobject, and this method will produce an error. On 17/08/07, Michael Preslar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Found something. For class variables..

Re: [PHP] Re: isset($a-b) even if $a-b = null

2007-08-17 Thread Olav Mørkrid
the test i need should give the following results: - FALSE when $a-b does not exist at all - TRUE when $a-b = null - TRUE when $a-b = any value empty() gives true for both $a-b = null and not setting any value, so that's no good. borokovs suggestion seems to miss the purpose. anyone else? On

Re: [PHP] Re: isset($a-b) even if $a-b = null

2007-08-17 Thread Borokov Smith
Maybe if you tell us exactly what you wish to achieve. Class variables that are not created at object creation is bad design. Olav Mørkrid schreef: yes, but that assumes you have a defined class. if $a comes from mysql_fetch_object() for instance you have just a stdobject, and this method will

Re: [PHP] Re: isset or array_key_exists?

2006-02-18 Thread Robert Cummings
On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 04:56, Rafael wrote: After a little test, although the results are not conclusive, I would say that isset(), and also that array_key_exists() may even use isset() (or similiar) internally as a first step -let's remember that isset() only does a fast search and it

Re: [PHP] Re: isset or array_key_exists?

2006-02-18 Thread Satyam
- Original Message - From: Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Rafael [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: PHP-General php-general@lists.php.net Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2006 3:21 PM Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: isset or array_key_exists? On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 04:56, Rafael wrote: After a little

Re: [PHP] Re: isset or array_key_exists?

2006-02-18 Thread Rafael
Actually, it doesn't have much sense that it creates a variable (or index), though it had sense why wouldn't be so easily detected, so I printed the array after the loops and there's no new keys. I think that if that was the case, it was definitely a bug that has been corrected (PHP 4.4.0)

Re: [PHP] Re: isset or array_key_exists?

2006-02-18 Thread Robert Cummings
On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 12:39, Rafael wrote: Actually, it doesn't have much sense that it creates a variable (or index), though it had sense why wouldn't be so easily detected, so I printed the array after the loops and there's no new keys. I think that if that was the case, it was

Re: [PHP] Re: isset

2005-02-16 Thread M. Sokolewicz
Marek Kilimajer wrote: M. Sokolewicz wrote: Also note that empty($non_existent_var) will always throw an E_NOTICE error when the variable in question is not set. No, it does not. hmm... seems to have changed since I last checked (PHP5 change?) I appoligize :) -- PHP General Mailing List

Re: [PHP] Re: isset

2005-02-16 Thread Matthew Weier O'Phinney
* Bret Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I just wish there was a use strict; sort of deal so I would not have to hunt down logic errors due to mistyping a variable name. There is, in PHP5: E_STRICT. From the manual (http://php.net/manual/en/ref.errorfunc.php#errorfunc.constants): Run-time notices.

Re: [PHP] Re: isset

2005-02-16 Thread Bret Hughes
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 07:54, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: * Bret Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I just wish there was a use strict; sort of deal so I would not have to hunt down logic errors due to mistyping a variable name. There is, in PHP5: E_STRICT. From the manual

Re: [PHP] Re: isset

2005-02-16 Thread Richard Lynch
Bret Hughes wrote: On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 07:54, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: * Bret Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I just wish there was a use strict; sort of deal so I would not have to hunt down logic errors due to mistyping a variable name. There is, in PHP5: E_STRICT. From the manual

Re: [PHP] Re: isset

2005-02-16 Thread Bret Hughes
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 10:34, Richard Lynch wrote: Bret Hughes wrote: On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 07:54, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: * Bret Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I just wish there was a use strict; sort of deal so I would not have to hunt down logic errors due to mistyping a variable

Re: [PHP] Re: isset

2005-02-16 Thread Bauglir
It's common mistake what you are doing... the first thing should be to test if there is such key in array: if (array_key_exists('cmd',$_POST)) { } this means to test it the variable exists, then you can test if it was set Brona Chris W. Parker wrote: M. Sokolewicz mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on

RE: [PHP] Re: isset

2005-02-15 Thread Chris W. Parker
M. Sokolewicz mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tuesday, February 15, 2005 8:25 AM said: seems lengthy. is there a way around this? i tried using $cmd = @ $_POST['cmd']; to suppress errors but didnt seem to have ay effect. still if(isset($_POST['cmd'])) { $cmd = $_POST['cmd']; }

Re: [PHP] Re: isset

2005-02-15 Thread M. Sokolewicz
Chris W. Parker wrote: M. Sokolewicz mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tuesday, February 15, 2005 8:25 AM said: seems lengthy. is there a way around this? i tried using $cmd = @ $_POST['cmd']; to suppress errors but didnt seem to have ay effect. still if(isset($_POST['cmd'])) { $cmd =

Re: [PHP] Re: isset

2005-02-15 Thread Marek Kilimajer
M. Sokolewicz wrote: Also note that empty($non_existent_var) will always throw an E_NOTICE error when the variable in question is not set. No, it does not. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP] Re: isset

2005-02-15 Thread Bret Hughes
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 16:22, M. Sokolewicz wrote: Chris. that's a different issue. There are always at least 2 things you should do with your (expected) input: 1 - check if it *exists* (isset) 2 - check the validity (input-validation) for step #2 empty is very commonly used, and also a

RE: [PHP] Re: IsSet() and $_SESSION

2003-06-30 Thread Ford, Mike [LSS]
-Original Message- From: John Manko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 June 2003 15:14 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PHP] Re: IsSet() and $_SESSION None of these worked for me. ok, if you look at the code, the part where echo $_SESSION['uid']; is actually works. I get a

RE: [PHP] Re: isset

2002-07-09 Thread Preston Wade
Actually here is what I am trying to do. ?php if (isset($submit)) { echo Submitted!; } ? form action=?=$PHP_SELF ? method=post blah, blah input type=submit name=submit value=Submit /form -Original Message- From: vins [EMAIL PROTECTED]@INTERNET@HHC Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002

Re: [PHP] Re: isset

2002-07-09 Thread vins
oh ok. that is easy to forge then try the script that i wrong earliers... it's must safer. Preston Wade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Actually here is what I am trying to do. ?php if (isset($submit)) { echo Submitted!; } ?

Re: [PHP] Re: !isset ??

2002-02-06 Thread Erik Price
On Wednesday, February 6, 2002, at 03:28 PM, CC Zona wrote: PHP's loose typing means that !$somevar evalutes as true if the variable is null, if it has an (integer, float, or string) value of zero, if it's an empty string, or if it is set to boolean false. Or if the variable/index does