Subscribe

Hello mgr...@cruzio.com :-) You are now subscribed subscribe mgr...@cruzio.com "Mark Ryan" -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Subscribe

Hello mgr...@cruzio.com :-) You are now subscribed -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Re: Stream from call

ike (in OtherProcess ...) and (out OtherProcess ...). Be aware that the PicoLisp text stream functions (from) (till) (line) (char) etc. always read one additional character, which is placed in a look-ahead buffer, which can be retrieved with (peek) - depending on how the called executable handles stdin/std

Re: Stream from call

the first form (pipe exe) -> fd which returns a file descriptor. Bind it to a variable like (setq OtherProcess (pipe ...)) and then you can use it it in subsequent calls like (in OtherProcess ..) and (out OtherProcess ...). Be aware that the PicoLisp text stream functions (from) (till) (l

Re: Android keyboad for terminal

I like carrot. I am looking forward for more polished version. I will gladly pay. Carrot has smoother learning curve than penti. Carrot takes less brain space. I can operate carrot with one hand. Carrot have less throughput than penti, which can be fixed with personal llm auto complete. I miss

Re: Android keyboad for terminal

ve ideas how to make it work, if you are interested. >> >> Original Message >> On Mar 13, 2024, 15:58, Edgaras Šeputis < picolisp@software-lab.de> wrote: >> >>> No, I'm thinking of premium version in future if there is any interest in >>> basic

Re: Android keyboad for terminal

ail mobile >> >> Original Message >> On Mar 13, 2024, 15:02, Edgaras Šeputis < picolisp@software-lab.de> wrote: >> >>> Some quite long time ago I showed my special on screen keyboard here, there >>> was some minor interest, but

Re: Android keyboad for terminal

really documented all > that well, but now I finally managed to properly release it: > https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=morphles.CarrotKeys It can be > considered similar to Pente. Hope this can be of use for PicoLisp use "on the > go" :)

1brc

hi all, https://www.morling.dev/blog/one-billion-row-challenge/ I would like to share picolisp single process version: https://git.envs.net/mpech/tankf33der/raw/branch/master/1brc/demo.l Speed is ok 1 million row simple file on 40k cities = 1 sec, it is easy to calculate how fast it would

Re: Printed representation of (char 0) ?

Hi Thorsten, I agree with the others, that's not a string you are processing. Strictly speaking, PicoLisp text functions and PicoLisp strings (and symbol names) must not contain NULL character. How about processing this fixed-size values in binary, using (rd 'cnt) and (wr 'cnt) ? Important

docker for pil21

hi all, I have created a docker file for pil21 you can play with. Comments are welcome. https://git.envs.net/mpech/pil21-docker (mike) -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Subscribe

Hello rom...@hotely.be :-) You are now subscribed -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

LLVM17

hi all, LLVM17 released and PicoLisp successfully compiled out of the box and passed all tests on it. Happy coding. p.s. LLVM18-nightly works too so far. (mike) -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

monocypher library

hi all, Here you could find various bindings against monocypher crypto library: https://git.envs.net/mpech/monocypher-pil I will add more functions asap. (mike) -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Unsubscribe

Unsubscribe

Good bye r...@tamos.net :-( You are now unsubscribed Just changing (swapping) email addys. -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Re: Test Mail

Test2 > On Apr 7, 2023, at 08:35, Mike wrote: > >  > Test reply. > >> On Apr 7, 2023, at 08:20, Alexander Burger wrote: >> >> This is a test. Please ignore! >> >> ☺/ A!ex >> >> -- >> UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe -- UNSUBSCRIBE:

Re: Another Test

Test > On Apr 7, 2023, at 13:28, picolisp@software-lab.de wrote: > > Sorry for the noise! > > ☺/ A!ex > > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Another Test

Sorry for the noise! ☺/ A!ex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Unsubscribe

Good bye picol...@dnmx.org :-( You are now unsubscribed -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Re: Why do waitFd and gPoll use 292MY for timeout?

$ picolisp -wait [fds=0x0][nfds=0][timeout=9223372036854775807] [fds=0x0][nfds=0][timeout=9223372036854775807] [fds=0x0][nfds=0][timeout=9223372036854775807] [fds=0x0][nfds=0][timeout=9223372036854775807] [fds=0x0][nfds=0][timeout=9223372036854775807] [fds=0x0][nfds=0][timeout=9223372036854775807

Re: Why do waitFd and gPoll use 292MY for timeout?

> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 08:32:32AM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote: >> That's too bad! If poll(2) uses only 32 bits for the timeout, the maximum is >> 49 >> days (as opposed to the 292 million years (292MY) in 64 bits). > > Not even that! For signed 32 bits it is only 24 days :( > > Should I

pil21: Why do waitFd and gPoll use 292MY for timeout?

I am trying to fix infinite select errors about 292MY. src/lib.c: int32_t gPoll(struct pollfd *fds, int32_t nfds, int64_t timeout) { if (timeout == 9223372036854775807) { // 292MY int i = nfds; do if (--i < 0) return 0; while

Subscribe

Hello picol...@dnmx.org :-) You are now subscribed -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Re: PicoLisp is DEAD (Was: PicoLisp and its (lack of) libraries)

not like something, or I am feeling it is dead, I will unsubscribe. The lack of libraries may be a problem from time to time, but PicoLisp has also to offer a lot, like its DB with Pilog, its Web-Framework, its simplicity. Often people need a language that allow for quick and dirty development. So

Subscribe

Hello glpg-picol...@m.gmane.org :-) You are now subscribed Subscribe -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe