Very nice. I like blurry and impressionistic. (This is interesting
because one of the things that the impressionist painters were
rebelling against was that sharp [some said stark] reality captured
by the then new process of photography...)
Mike Vande Bunt
Guy Glorieux wrote:
It was Sprind
Leezy - I'm in Westchester, but in NYC two days a week.
Barb
- Original Message -
From: Temi t...@temioriginals.com
Would it be best to come up with a total opening and figure time from
this or to figure time for one pinhole and then divide this by the
number of pinholes used.
- Original Message -
From: William Erickson
Temi,
I never succeeded in finding a safe formula for my multiple pinholes cameras
: there are really a lot of variables which influence the exposure . The
major ones seem to be :
- 1) the way you use multiple pinhole : opening /closing the various
pinholes simultaneously or not. The sum of x
Thanks, George, I've used the skew before, not for this. I need more
selecting skill. :)
Pam
George L Smyth wrote:
--- Pam Niedermayer pam_p...@cape.com wrote:
I don't know about pinhole, but when photographing with a regular lens
the general rule is to photograph approximately 30%
--- Guy Glorieux guy.glori...@sympatico.ca wrote:
It was Sprind Day a few days ago. My wife had bought some tulips to
celebrate. The sun was shining inside the house. I pulled my pinhole
Brownie Hawkey and got this shot. 2 minutes hand-held. More and more,
I do these blurry,
--- Pam Niedermayer pam_p...@cape.com wrote:
I don't know about pinhole, but when photographing with a regular lens
the general rule is to photograph approximately 30% overlap because
the lens introduces enough distortion that it would be impossible to
line up the adjacent shots otherwise.
Guy
Thanks for the inspiring image. I would not have thought of handholding, but
the movement and blurring of parts of the image adds a deeper level of
meaning for me. I've become, over the years, more interested in the essence
rather than pure descriptive fact of a place or object.
Happy
In a message dated 3/25/01 10:05:16 AM, t...@temioriginals.com writes:
Would it
be best to come up with a total opening and figure time from this or to
figure time for one pinhole and then divide this by the number of
pinholes used.
I would run a test roll giving each hole it's indicated
Oops, never mind that last question, I must be brain dead this morning.
Pam
Pam Niedermayer wrote:
I especially like the vase; although the vase itself seems a bit
underexposed, very little detail. This is strange, since you have a
fairly large white highlight. Were you shooting film or
I especially like the vase; although the vase itself seems a bit
underexposed, very little detail. This is strange, since you have a
fairly large white highlight. Were you shooting film or paper?
Pam
Vladimir Mikovic wrote:
Hi all,
I uploaded 3 images at,
http://www.p at
Hi Vladimir!
Lovely, moody images. Post more :-)
Tina
I uploaded 3 images at,
http://www.p at ???/discussion/upload/images/o1.jpg
http://www.p at ???/discussion/upload/images/o2.jpg
http://www.p at ???/discussion/upload/images/o3.jpg
These were done with zero2000 on paper negativ
In a message dated 3/25/01 11:46:11 AM, bi...@aol.com writes:
Guy - Really beautiful - thanks for sharing a very promising spring image
(It's cold in NY today, again).I like the figure in the background.
Barb
Yes it is cold in NY today.
Where are you Barb? I'm on Long Island. Are we
In a message dated 3/25/01 6:32:53 AM, robin.roc...@virgin.net writes:
I
recognise one or two names from the old AOL photo group (leezie?) anyway it
is good to see the work
Hi Robin. Welcome to the world of pinhole photography!
You'll love it. It's addictive.
Best,
leezy
Hi all,
I uploaded 3 images at,
http://www.p at ???/discussion/upload/images/o1.jpg
http://www.p at ???/discussion/upload/images/o2.jpg
http://www.p at ???/discussion/upload/images/o3.jpg
These were done with zero2000 on paper negativ (Fortespeed 3 BW
photographic paper).
Comments
Guy - Really beautiful - thanks for sharing a very promising spring image
(It's cold in NY today, again).I like the figure in the background.
Barb
My experience was that adding up the areas of the multiple pinholes,
dividing that into the area of an f22 aperture at the pinhole-film distance
being used, and multiplying the metered f22 time by the product of the
division works fine.
- Original Message -
From: Temi
Greetings all,
I am new to this list, but not to photography. I have started to use pinhole
cameras for 5x4 Polaroid work, with a view to giving me a fresh look at
picture making, as well as using it on an a trip to Greece this Autumn. I
recognise one or two names from the old AOL photo group
Good to see your site Tina. I enjoyed your photos.
best wishes
Robin
What is the best way to figure the approx time when using more than one
pinhole. There are a lot of variables as to placement of pinholes and
sizes, etc., but what is a good starting point to experiment. Would it
be best to come up with a total opening and figure time from this or to
figure time
Hi Tina, Nice site - I enjoyed the transfers - will need to try this
myself someday. Your Clouds page is labeled Trees - thought you
might like to correct this.
21 matches
Mail list logo
