= Original Message From Traci Bunkers bonk...@bonkersfiber.com =
Yes, but the guides don't always work--like with 35mm pinhole pictures where
the image extends into the sprocket holes and you want to scan the whole
thing. Or when running 35mm film through a medium format camera (same issue
-discussion@p at ???
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] What is the best scanner?
Well, I would simply use the guides - why not? You can automate things so
that, by using the guides, it will recognize the images and offer them to you
already selected. This allows you to scan them in batches
-Post: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:06:01 -0500
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] What is the best scanner?
DAlfrey,brWhen I put my negs on the scanner bed without using the guides, I
get thosebrcircles from the negs touching the glass. Does that happen to you?
I'm
Traci Bunkers wrote:
I also have the Epson 2450 Sometimes the
software seems kind of slow
Try VueScan from Hamrick Software -- http://www.hamrick.com -- it's extremely
good. The Epson USB1 scanners can be a bit slow on large, high resolution
images.
Stewart
From: dalf...@aol.com
Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 04:42:19 EDT
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] What is the best scanner?
and the Type 55 neg is a tad larger than the guide ' and I want
to include the perforations
