Re: Those darn little [img] tags

2003-03-05 Thread Robert O'Connor
On 4 Mar 2003 at 22:17, Saúl Perdomo M. wrote: Please don't flame me if this question has been asked (over and over) before, but I couldn't find any mention of it in the list archives. The question is: when you convert a page into the plucker format using the --noimages option, how do you

Re: Those darn little [img] tags

2003-03-05 Thread David A. Desrosiers
There was a patch kindly written for this, including additions to the commandline for no alt image tags if not a link, but it seems to not be on the net anywhere anymore before it could get into CVS. Does anyone have a copy of it? It this what you seek?

Re: Those darn little [img] tags

2003-03-05 Thread Robert O'Connor
There was a patch kindly written for this, including additions to the commandline for no alt image tags if not a link, but it seems to not be on the net anywhere anymore before it could get into CVS. Does anyone have a copy of it? It this what you seek?

Re: Those darn little [img] tags

2003-03-05 Thread MJ Ray
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Sa=FAl_Perdomo_M=2E=22?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --noimages option, how do you get plkr to *not* display [img] wherever an image was supposed to be? Report the bug to the webmaster? MJR ___ plucker-list mailing list [EMAIL

Those darn little [img] tags

2003-03-04 Thread Saúl Perdomo M.
Please don't flame me if this question has been asked (over and over) before, but I couldn't find any mention of it in the list archives. The question is: when you convert a page into the plucker format using the --noimages option, how do you get plkr to *not* display [img] wherever an image