This is a weird thing. I've had the exact same problem, only with Plucker
.gz downloads. Winzip tells me they're not valid archives. What I've learned
is that, for whatever reason, when they arrive at my computer they're no
longer .gzipped. I just strip off the .gz extension, and they're fine.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 09:06:20PM -0500, sirkus wrote:
However, I'm having some trouble getting the parser to work like I need.
I have an E-book I'm trying to create that has a coule large graphics in
it. I'm trying to get a 290x225 16bpp image to display correctly (i.e.
full size 16 bit
Adam McDaniel wrote:
A few weeks ago someone had this same problem. Some browsers uncompress
the .gz file while you're downloading it. But, they're not quite smart
enough to strip off the .gz extension, and that's where the confusion
lies.
I don't remember which browsers are affected by
Adam, thanks for the info. I couldn't put my finger on where this limit
was being hit. That explains it. I look forward to seeing how this
limitation is passed. Is the plan to figure out a way to split
images/files across multiple records?
On Wed, 2002-04-24 at 09:07, Adam McDaniel wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 01:23:17PM -0500, sirkus wrote:
Adam, thanks for the info. I couldn't put my finger on where this limit
was being hit. That explains it. I look forward to seeing how this
limitation is passed. Is the plan to figure out a way to split
images/files across multiple
Title: Bug: Plucker doesn't ignore commented URLs!
I have been plucking a site and noticed that one of his links was bad (not found error when plucking) so I reported it to him. He said he had commented out that bad link months ago but removed it so I wouldn't see the error any more. Is
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Gregg Woodcock wrote:
I have been plucking a site and noticed that one of his links was bad (not
found error when plucking) so I reported it to him. He said he had
commented out that bad link months ago but removed it so I wouldn't see the
error any more. Is plucker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is the new site going to be Plucker-friendly, such as placing the
navigation-table in the far-right td instead of the far-left td?
(HHOS)
Even better, it will deliver you a PDA-sized version of the website,
if you present the right
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, David A. Desrosiers wrote:
Even better, it will deliver you a PDA-sized version of the website,
if you present the right UserAgent string to the site itself. No more bloat!
..which reminds me.. we need to change that PyPlucker/1.0 string to
something more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Better than the last... stay tuned!
d.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8xxmykRQERnB1rkoRAmpIAJ9yC0N8jGodRnaTmzfVS0EfBCD02gCgw1OE
WJlfI8mKa7/9WGCcYJKaEJ0=
David A. Desrosiers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even better, it will deliver you a PDA-sized version of the website,
if you present the right UserAgent string to the site itself. No more bloat!
I browse via proxies. Please don't rely on User-Agent being correct.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis McCunney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 9:51 PM
To: 'Michael Nordstrom'; 'Plucker List'
Subject: RE: Missing session data (was: New beta)
-Original Message-
From: Michael Nordstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
12 matches
Mail list logo
