Try this:
for i in $(echo $PATH | awk 'BEGIN { RS=":" } { print $0 }') ; do find $i
-type f -executable -print0 | xargs -0 file ; done | grep ELF | sort | uniq
| less
I got about 2000 lines.
On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 10:16 PM American Citizen
wrote:
> I am attempting to provide enough
I've just run the latest updates from Ubuntu for my Xubuntu machines,
which included Brave browser. In each case, video does no longer
display. Audio works, and is the audio for the video I'm trying to
watch. I can successfully watch the same URL with Firefox, so I'm
assuming something went
I am attempting to provide enough information on the missing man pages,
so I spent about 3 hours this evening on this.
I have a linux OpenSuse Leap 15.5 linux system. Running the zipper list
shows 7,443 installed programs for the software respositories
Here's the results of my investigations
To all readers:
Maybe on determining missing man pages we should first define exactly
what executables we mean? All ELF files? (not scripts?) etc?
My initial determination was using strictly ELF files to look for the
man pages from them
Randall
On 3/23/24 10:03, MC_Sequoia wrote:
"I was
MC Sequoia
I appreciate all the feedback I can get. Thank you for alerting me to this.
Randall
On 3/23/24 10:03, MC_Sequoia wrote:
"I was surprised to find < 15% of the command executables were
documented. Naturally I was hoping for something like 50% to 75%."
I don't run Suze, but color me
Robert:
As I am reading the replies back to the forum, now I come on your 2nd email
Thank you for this post.
I am going try to implement your script at the root level and see what
comes up
Randall
On 3/23/24 09:21, Robert Citek wrote:
I ask because I get very different results.
<<<
Robert
wow, asking me to start from scratch again
1. file . -executable -print (at root level with root permissions)
2. type {file names found} and save only the ELF executables
3. man executable name
This in short is what I did
Please be aware that 10,000's of executables will come up.
Paul:
Good question from you.
for executables I used
$ find . -executable -print
at the root level "/" on my hard drive hosting the linux OS (using root
permissions)
Then I had to filter these by doing a
file {found name} to actually narrow to the executable
Example:
On Sat, 23 Mar 2024, Johnathan Mantey wrote:
Did I miss the definition of SAR?
System Activity Report. On my Slackware desktop it's in /user/bin/sar.
man page available, too.
HTH,
Rich
First: My brother, John Jeddeloh, was found deceased in his home
January 14. He was known on this list as "John Jason Jordan." From his
computer files it looks like he has been active here for many years. I
have even found boxes with meeting posters dating back to 2013.
Second: I need to
On Sat, 23 Mar 2024, Rich Shepard wrote:
Why sdg has two partitions I don't know. My question is to which device
name I point dd's of=? /dev/sdg or /dev/sdg1. Or should I use cfdisk to
re-partition the drive?
Never mind. I ran `dd if=usbboot.img of=/dev/sdg and I now again have a
bootable
For some reason the bootable thumb drive I made (for Slackware64-15.0) now
asks to load PXE to install over the network rather than from the flash
drive itself.
I have the usbboot.img file and the flash drive is seen by the kernel:
Mar 23 11:04:35 salmo kernel: [246888.820945] sdg: sdg1 sdg2
On Sat, 23 Mar 2024, Michael Ewan wrote:
Some swap is necessary but not the RAM+2GB or other calculations, those
kinds of recommendations are based on very old memory management routines.
You can start with a swap file for safety and then measure actual memory
use under actual work loads over
On Saturday, March 23rd, 2024 at 9:57 AM, Galen Seitz
wrote:
> On 3/23/24 00:55, Ben Koenig wrote:
>
> > Ideally, the whole point of an LLM is to create a problem that can
> > interpret human language so that we can interact with software in a
> > "human" way. It shouldn't matter if the data
"I was surprised to find < 15% of the command executables were
documented. Naturally I was hoping for something like 50% to 75%."
I don't run Suze, but color me very suspicious. I did a quick Google search and
found this thread about missing man pages. You might want to read through it.
In
On 3/23/24 00:55, Ben Koenig wrote:
Ideally, the whole point of an LLM is to create a problem that can
interpret human language so that we can interact with software in a
"human" way. It shouldn't matter if the data is garbage, as long as
the result is a program that understands english.
Once
I ask because I get very different results.
<<< ${PATH} tr : '\n' |
while read folder ; do
echo == ${folder}
find ${folder}/ -type f -executable |
rev |
cut -d / -f1 |
rev |
xargs -t -n1 man -w 2>&1 |
cat -n
done |
tee /tmp/file.list.man.txt
$ wc -l /tmp/file.list.man.txt
2863
TV Station (in Eugene, OR!) Launches Multiple 4K Broadcasts OTA on ATSC
1.0 "https://iv.datura.network/watch?v=e_94q9TCCDY;
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 6:04 PM American Citizen
wrote:
> A few years ago, I took my Linux OS which is openSuse Leap v15.3 or so
> and ran a check on the documentation such as the man1 through man9 pages
> (run the %man man command to pull all this up) versus the actual
> executables on the
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024, American Citizen wrote:
A few years ago, I took my Linux OS which is openSuse Leap v15.3 or so and
ran a check on the documentation such as the man1 through man9 pages (run the
%man man command to pull all this up) versus the actual executables on the
system.
I was
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024, Russell Senior wrote:
To me, the only open question is whether humans get stupider faster than
the machines.
Isn't that why the search for extraterrestrial intelligence has been going
on for so many decades?
Rich
Ideally, the whole point of an LLM is to create a problem that can interpret
human language so that we can interact with software in a "human" way. It
shouldn't matter if the data is garbage, as long as the result is a program
that understands english.
Once you have that, you can point it to
22 matches
Mail list logo
