Add PLUG reserves the right to suspend or remove any account not in compliance.
Josef Lowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: .
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Joseph Sinclair wrote (in part)
I agree that while PLUG should welcome job postings from legitimate
sources with some relevance to the group,
On 8/29/07, keith smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add PLUG reserves the right to suspend or remove any account not in
compliance.
And for my reference, WHO is PLUG?
-jmz
*Josef Lowder [EMAIL PROTECTED]* wrote:
.
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Joseph Sinclair wrote (in part)
I agree that
(P)hoenix (L)inux (U)sers (G)roup
This list.
Joshua Zeidner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/29/07, keith smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add PLUG reserves the right to suspend or remove any account not in compliance.
And for my reference, WHO is PLUG?
-jmz
Josef Lowder [EMAIL
Joshua Zeidner wrote:
On 8/29/07, *keith smith* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add PLUG reserves the right to suspend or remove any account not in
compliance.
And for my reference, WHO is PLUG?
Straight to the point. WE are PLUG.
There is a
Hey Tuna,
If you guys want a community, you've got to support conflict
resolution. Not everybody sees things the same way, if they did, there
wouldn't be any reason to be typing stuff into my computer. I do somewhat
miss the days when listservs were really helpful places to do business,
Joshua Zeidner wrote:
Honestly, I've been through this with one group already here in
Phoenix. Usually if something happens someone doesn't like, they evoke
the hidden and mysterious powers of moderation. Behind this somewhat
ridiculous fig-leaf is some callow sheepish dude who has the
.
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:01, Joshua Zeidner wrote
... snip snip snip ...
If the person who recently offered up his grandfatherly
opinion of the whole thing feels he is in the position
of leadership here, he should make that abundantly clear.
... snip snip snip ...
I guess this little
Josef, thanks for your courage and leadership.
Josef Lowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: .
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:01, Joshua Zeidner wrote
... snip snip snip ...
If the person who recently offered up his grandfatherly
opinion of the whole thing feels he is in the position
of leadership
There is a difference between flame, disagreement, discussion and love.
Only flame is outside of a community and disagreement is not always
unproductive.
I did not see any of the below as a flame. Discussion, surely and
disagreement, perhaps, but no flames.
Alan
Tuna wrote:
Why must we
