[pmacct-discussion] nfacctd - log missed sequence numbers?

2017-02-23 Thread Edward Henigin
I see in the config keys for nfacctd that by default it checks sequence
numbers and will log an error if any are missing.

[ nfacctd_disable_checks | sfacctd_disable_checks ] [GLOBAL, NO_PMACCTD]
Values

[true|false]
Desc

both nfacctd and sfacctd check health of incoming NetFlow/sFlow datagrams -
actually this is limited to just verifying sequence numbers progression.
You may want to disable such feature because of non-standard
implementations. By default checks are enabled

(default: false)


My question: what does that log message look like? I suspect I'm losing
flows and I want to check the logs for evidence. I looked in src/nfacctd.c
to see if I could tell what the syslog message would look like but I can't
figure out where it's checking the sequence numbers for continuity and
logging an error on lost data.

Thanks,

Ed
___
pmacct-discussion mailing list
http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists

Re: [pmacct-discussion] bgp_daemon wrong next-hop

2017-02-23 Thread Alberto Santos
Hi Paolo, I want to help with this, I was quite busy in jan, but now I have
the setup almost ready.
I just need to install pmacct in the VM where we will have the BGP peering,
looks like the same issue I reported before.

BR
Al



Alberto Santos CCIE #26648
JNCIS-SP
*"...Fix your DNS, make it dual-stack, take your mail server and make it
dual-stack, take your web server and make it dual-stack..." by Randy
Bush/RIPE IPv6*

On 17 February 2017 at 16:10, Paolo Lucente  wrote:

>
> Hi Catalin,
>
>
> Any chance we can go unicast and arrange a way for me to troubleshoot
> this? Like either you point the BGP session towards one of my boxes or
> you can grant me temporary access to your environment? Happy to support
> you.
>
> Thanks,
> Paolo
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 02:53:25PM +, Catalin Petrescu wrote:
> > >
> > > Currently i have only type 0 and i can see in the logs the correct
> > > next-hop:
> >
> >
> > mistake form my side , the next hop is still not correct but has changed
> to
> > another randon ip.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Catalin
>
> > ___
> > pmacct-discussion mailing list
> > http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists
>
>
> ___
> pmacct-discussion mailing list
> http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists
>
___
pmacct-discussion mailing list
http://www.pmacct.net/#mailinglists