* David E. Wheeler da...@kineticode.com [2010-03-15T13:32:28]
Comments?
From perlpodspec (presented as verbatim text):
=item C $thing-stuff(Idodad)
Further, I see nothing that implies that C Cfoo should be rendered as
Cfoo rather than foo
I don't know that I realized this was the
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, David E. Wheeler wrote:
Comments?
I agree with the bug report, FWIW (just based on reading the
report, I haven't verified that nested formatting has been
broken).
Cheers,
-Jan
Begin forwarded message:
From: Christopher J. Madsen via RT bug-pod-sim...@rt.cpan.org
On Mar 15, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Ricardo Signes wrote:
Is there anyone who can provide a reading of the spec to support the change?
Do you (David) remember what part of the spec convinced you?
When I made the change, I wasn't aware of the spec, but based the change on
`perlpod`, particularly
* David E. Wheeler da...@kineticode.com [2010-03-15T14:56:48]
C open(X, thing.dat) || die $!
C $foo−bar();
which is presumably easier to read than the old way:
Copen(X, EgtEgtthing.dat) || die $!
C$foo−Egtbar();
My
On Mar 15, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Ricardo Signes wrote:
In other words, the only change /C{2,}\s+/ has over /C{1}/ is that it
changes
the number of 's that are needed to close that code. Fewer 's than that are
just text.
Frustrating.
Well, should it change to that? If we can all agree on a
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 04:28:15PM -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Mar 15, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Ricardo Signes wrote:
In other words, the only change /C{2,}\s+/ has over /C{1}/ is that it
changes
the number of 's that are needed to close that code. Fewer 's than that
are
just text.
* David E. Wheeler da...@kineticode.com [2010-03-15T19:28:15]
Well, should it change to that? If we can all agree on a proper solution and
update the spec to be specific, I'm happy to modify Pod::Simple (if I can
find the tuits) to match that.
FWIW, I blogged about this when 3.09 came out:
On Mar 15, 2010, at 6:08 PM, Ricardo Signes wrote:
...and clearly I agreed! I'm not sure whether I misunderstood or was just
wrong. Either way, I think the change was incorrect.
I will try to write an update for the spec soon.
Okay. Once that's done and we have consensus, I'll try to find
