Is Pod::Simple::POD worth pursuing?

For reasons too long and unrelated to go into (see https://github.com/CPAN-API/cpan-api/issues/269 for the tail end of some of it), I spent a couple hours the other night whacking together a draft version of Pod::Simple::POD. You can see the repo with the initial work and a very minimal initial

Re: Is Pod::Simple::POD worth pursuing?

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Ricardo Signes perl@rjbs.manxome.org wrote: It's hard to judge this without the context in which you're considering it. The GH issue to which you linked is largely context-free. The context is that MetaCPAN's '/pod' endpoint is currently using Pod::POM for

Re: Is Pod::Simple::POD worth pursuing?

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Karl Williamson pub...@khwilliamson.com wrote: In order to remove this dependency, one of these things will have to happen: 1) We put John's new code in core, and podcheck.t uses it. 2) I steal John's code and put it in podcheck.t 3) I reimplement what John's

Re: Is Pod::Simple::POD worth pursuing?

I'm happy to work towards #1, FWIW. I would think getting it into the CPAN Pod::Simple would be a necessary first step there. I finally got around to starting on this tonight: https://github.com/genehack/pod-simple/tree/add-pod-simple-pod Feedback is appreciated, especially on the tests (which

Re: Is Pod::Simple::POD worth pursuing?

On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Karl Williamson pub...@khwilliamson.com wrote: On 06/27/2013 11:41 PM, John SJ Anderson wrote: I'm happy to work towards #1, FWIW. I would think getting it into the CPAN Pod::Simple would be a necessary first step there. I finally got around to starting

Re: Pod::Simple output as POD

> On May 7, 2018, at 21:52, Karl Williamson wrote: > > And I'm running into something that I know I had not previously gotten as far > as (which is encouraging), and I'm writing now for counsel. > > What to do about input files that are encoded in some alien