Hello,
Unless I have missed something, seems that Pod::Parser is not used much,
and pod formatting used within perl uses Pod::Simple and most formatter
have switched to using Pod::Simple except for the formatter to DocBook. But
this information is not that easy to figure out. Maybe there should
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 03:38:48PM +0100, Marek Rouchal wrote:
podchecker _does_ detect wrong internal links. If you
put any of the following links in the POD you quoted
below, podchecker (as of Pod-Parser-1.38 and higher)
will flag it as an error:
L/open FILEHANDLE,MODE,EXPRESSION
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 09:26:31AM +0100, Marek Rouchal wrote:
So your issues are with pod2html, less with Pod::Checker.
Which pod2html are you using? Likely the issues with
hyperlinks should be fixed there.
My feeling is that it is pod2html which is right and Pod::Checker
should find a
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 04:33:14PM -0700, John SJ Anderson wrote:
* Is this a worthwhile idea? (The recent How do I get Pod::Simple to
extract pod thread suggests the answer is yes.)
* Should I be working on this as a branch of Pod::Simple with the idea
it could be included there eventually?
On Sun, Oct 04, 2020 at 05:11:35PM +0200, Dmitry Karasik wrote:
> Hello
>
> Thank you all for review, it is clear that some things I wasn't focused at
> don't fall in as gracefully as I wanted. So it seems that P<> neither serves
> any good as an inline image anchor, nor versatile enough to
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 01:44:38PM +0200, Dmitry Karasik wrote:
> The proposal is that title and image are always shown together, or always
> ignored together. For html and others, P<> doesn’t need to be wrapped in
> =begin, that’s the whole point of it to not care about specific format, and
>
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 11:35:45AM +0200, Dmitry Karasik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've proposed addition of images to pod, as discussed at [1], and would like
> to
> ask for some more discussion here as well The idea is rather simple, to
> introduce a P<> tag in two forms, P and P, that would
> get
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 08:43:08AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Does anyone want to make an argument for keeping this in the spec? If
> not, I'm going to submit a PR to Perl to remove this whole bullet point.
> (The note about including errors as comments is not wrong, but I don't
> think it
On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 06:22:13PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I wanted to provide some advance notice that I plan to increase the
> minimum Perl dependency for podlators (Pod::Man and Pod::Text) to 5.12
> from 5.10 in the next release.
Perl 5.10 is still used on solaris 11,
