Calculation in policyd-weigth

Hallo list I think policyd-weight should offer a possibility to check all DNSBL and RHBL in order to calculate a accurate weight number. The reason why I think this is needed is because of the negative values a entry could have. Or at least there should be a max minus value for DNSBL and/or RH

S25R anti-spam system and some other stuff

Hallo list Has any one read this: http://www.gabacho-net.jp/en/anti-spam/anti-spam-system.html It sounds very interesting. Without DNS lookups getting most of the dialups. I have changed on one of my test servers the newest policyd-weight edition (beta-5) to use that for dynamic host detection:

Strange scoring with 0.1.14 beta-5

Hello list I have installed 0.1.14 beta-5 on my server and have now different scoring then with beta-3. beta-5: May 18 18:49:19 mail postfix/policyd-weight[19862]: weighted check: IN_DNSWL=-0.5 IN_NERD-US=2.044 NOT_IN_SPAMCOP=-1.5 NOT_IN_ZEN_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP

Re: Strange scoring with 0.1.14 beta-5

Original-Nachricht Datum: Fri, 18 May 2007 12:53:19 -0600 Von: Kenny Dail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: policyd-weight-list@ek-muc.de Betreff: Re: Strange scoring with 0.1.14 beta-5 Hallo Kenny > > Hello list I have installed 0.1.14 beta-5 on my server and have now > > different scori

Re: Strange scoring with 0.1.14 beta-5

Original-Nachricht Datum: Fri, 18 May 2007 21:10:37 +0200 Von: Robert Felber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: policyd-weight-list@ek-muc.de Betreff: Re: Strange scoring with 0.1.14 beta-5 > On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 08:31:11PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hello list > > > > I have

Re: Strange scoring with 0.1.14 beta-5

Original-Nachricht Datum: Fri, 18 May 2007 21:35:13 +0200 Von: Robert Felber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: policyd-weight-list@ek-muc.de Betreff: Re: Strange scoring with 0.1.14 beta-5 > On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:25:00PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > # SPAMHAUS TOP 10 COUNTRIES

Re: Strange scoring with 0.1.14 beta-5

Original-Nachricht Datum: Fri, 18 May 2007 22:04:36 +0200 Von: Robert Felber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: policyd-weight-list@ek-muc.de Betreff: Re: Strange scoring with 0.1.14 beta-5 > On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:53:21PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > I did now some more te

Re: Strange scoring with 0.1.14 beta-5

Original-Nachricht Datum: Fri, 18 May 2007 22:47:56 +0200 Von: Robert Felber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: policyd-weight-list@ek-muc.de Betreff: Re: Strange scoring with 0.1.14 beta-5 > On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 10:18:41PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >@dnsbl_score = ( > >

Re: Strange scoring with 0.1.14 beta-5

Original-Nachricht Datum: Fri, 18 May 2007 23:50:18 +0200 Von: Robert Felber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: policyd-weight-list@ek-muc.de Betreff: Re: Strange scoring with 0.1.14 beta-5 > On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 11:19:45PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Original-Nach

Re: S25R anti-spam system and some other stuff

Original-Nachricht Datum: Sat, 19 May 2007 04:15:47 -0400 (EDT) Von: Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: policyd-weight-list@ek-muc.de Betreff: Re: S25R anti-spam system and some other stuff > > > On Fri, 18 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Hal

Senderbase and policyd-weight

Hello list I am playing around with Senderbase (www.senderbase.org) and want to integrate it into policyd-weight. Currently I am using Net::SenderBase (http://search.cpan.org/~msergeant/Net-SenderBase-1.01/) and it works very well. The information of the returned codes of Senderbase are not any

Re: Senderbase and policyd-weight

Original-Nachricht Datum: Sun, 20 May 2007 00:30:46 +0200 Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: policyd-weight-list@ek-muc.de Betreff: Senderbase and policyd-weight > Hello list > > I am playing around with Senderbase (www.senderbase.org) and want to > integrate it into policyd-weight. Cu