Hi,
On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 09:23:01PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
The diff at http://junkpile.org/squid.reorg.diff (not inline as it's 360kB)
reorganises the squid ports; it removes squid27 now that the main squid port
works on more arches, and splits www/squid into stable (with the
Hi Stuart,
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 06:20:26PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014/01/09 17:48, Toni Mueller wrote:
proxy:\
:ignorenologin:\
:datasize=infinity:\
:maxproc=128:\
:openfiles=1024:\
:stacksize-cur=64M
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 08:08:04PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014/01/09 20:39, Toni Mueller wrote:
Of course - but I have kern.maxfiles = 16000, and still saw the problem.
squid can't itself do anything to raise the limit above what you
have set in login.conf, kern.maxfiles
Hi,
@David: thanks for putting in some work and reminding me to do this...
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 05:30:21PM -0400, David Hill wrote:
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 17:30:21 -0400
From: David Hill dh...@mindcry.org
To: ports@openbsd.org
@all: Please take over all my ports and remove me from
Hi,
On Tue, 06.07.2010 at 00:11:26 -0400, William Yodlowsky will...@openbsd.org
wrote:
3.0 won't be upgraded any more, which is why -current has 3.6 in its
place.
ok - I've yesterday seen an empty 3.6 directory, but at least a working
3.5 directory. 4.7 ships with 3.0.18, though.
Even
Hi,
I'm on the list, so please...
On Sun, 04.07.2010 at 12:22:21 +0100, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
wrote:
On 2010/07/04 11:18, Toni Mueller wrote:
I can go. In many cases, this works just fine.
In many cases, it works, but also in many cases, it breaks.
right. I didn't say
Hi,
On Sun, 04.07.2010 at 14:00:11 +0200, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
That's no longer true, we do have people handling stable ports and packages
for security purposes.
it would be great, then, to also note updates on this page:
http://www.openbsd.org/pkg-stable.html
TIA!
--
Kind
Hi,
there seems to be some kind of misunderstanding about what I consider
to be the problem, and what you think what I'm doing.
On Sat, 03.07.2010 at 22:49:19 +0200, Matthias Kilian k...@outback.escape.de
wrote:
If you're trying to use a current ports tree on a -stable system,
To clarify:
Hi Stuart,
On Fri, 02.07.2010 at 12:27:27 +0100, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
wrote:
Sorry reports from 4.7 are not too helpful here for this. If it
happens for anyone on -current, please capture full build logs -
I'm aware that the project may not have that much of an interest in
Hi,
On Wed, 16.06.2010 at 17:00:19 +0100, Federico G. Schwindt fg...@lodoss.net
wrote:
is there any reason to keep 2.5 around and specially as the default?
keep around: yes, default: no
having to check your ports against 2.5 and 2.6 is time consuming (I'm not
considering 2.4 as should
Hi,
On Wed, 23.06.2010 at 20:06:02 +0100, Federico G. Schwindt fg...@lodoss.net
wrote:
specially on something else than i386 and amd64, although more testing on
those won't hurt.
I just tested it on i386 so far.
FTBFS on 4.7/amd64:
=== Building package for python-2.6.5
Create
Hello,
I'm trying to prevent people from hammering my FTP servers with stupid
login attempts, and devised the following 'sec' rule file:
--
type=SingleWithThreshold
ptype=RegExp
continue=TakeNext
pattern=pure-ftpd\[[0-9]+\]: \(\?\@([0-9\.]+)\) \[WARNING\]
Hi,
On Mon, 01.03.2010 at 15:45:25 +, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
wrote:
I would try running it under ktrace to look for clues
the problem was actually a case of PEBKAC. Doh...
--
Kind regards,
--Toni++
Hello,
I've done a preliminary port of policyd 2.0.10 aka 'cluebringer'. This
is a daemon that you can delegate your Postfix's policy decisions to,
plus a web user interface to configure it.
Upstream is here: http://www.policyd.org/
Grab it here:
Hi,
reading Jasper's mail from Tuesday that one can possibly still get updates in,
I've rushed and created packages for Python 2.5.5 and Python 2.6.4. The
packages compile, and 'make regress' runs ok for 2.5, but breaks for 2.6:
For Python 2.5:
284 tests OK.
38 tests skipped:
test_aepack
Hi,
On Thu, 25.02.2010 at 12:22:18 +0100, Toni Mueller openbsd-po...@oeko.net
wrote:
For Python 2.6:
327 tests OK.
1 test failed:
test_httpservers
I've found that this error also appear to exist in Linux and on Mac
OS-X:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?ctype=htmlid=293201
http
Hi,
just a quick note: this patch made the port to compile, but the
resulting package is severely broken. Amongst other problems, db 4.6 is
not recognized as a suitable backend, despite the website stating that
everything at or above db 4.4 should work.
I'm working on it, but I'm making only
Hi,
On Wed, 17.02.2010 at 17:02:16 +, Vijay Sankar vsan...@foretell.ca wrote:
FWIW here is what I did a few years ago
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=118041036902594w=2
thanks for nudging me into the right direction... see below.
For the past year I have used the port for 2.4.12
Hi,
who of you is using OpenLDAP in a replicated setup using syncrepl, as
opposed to slurp, and with TLS?
I found that these three configuration statements make the difference
between a working LDAP server and one that hangs on every 'add'
operation, requiring a 'kill -9' and a restart:
overlay
Hi,
I've just seen that OpenBSD 4.7 *might* contain Python 2.6.3 as opposed
to the current Python 2.6.4. Someone said that the tree has already
frozen, but I don't see a tag in CVS. Anyway, updating to 2.6.4 should
be really useful. Quote from upstream's release notes, available here:
Hi,
I've just seen that OpenBSD 4.7 *might* contain Python 2.5.4 as opposed
to the current Python 2.5.5.
Reading
http://www.python.org/download/releases/2.5.5/NEWS.txt
suggests that Python 2.5.5 is actually a security update.
Maybe it's still possible to update Python 2.5, too?
--
Kind
Hi,
On Wed, 17.02.2010 at 18:27:14 +0100, Landry Breuil lan...@rhaalovely.net
wrote:
Considering the timeframe, i don't think so. Post diffs for -STABLE
post-unlock... ditto for 2.6. It could have been done ages ago...
sure, but apparently, the port maintainer didn't notice. Nor did I. :(
Hi,
On Sun, 03.01.2010 at 22:54:41 +0100, Frank Denis obsd-po...@pureftpd.org
wrote:
Le Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 10:21:55PM +0100, Toni Mueller ecrivait :
as distributed, the package has a discrepancy between the FTPStatus
field in the schema, where the comment says that the value should
Hi,
I'm having a problem with pure-ftpd-ldap from packages, and I am now
out of my wits. Sorry. :(
The problem: After upgrading from 4.4 and 4.5, I cannot log in to any
account on any of my FTP servers anymore because the passwords are
rejected. Using lftp, I can see this:
$ lftp -d -u
Hi Frank,
thanks for your quick answer!
On Sun, 03.01.2010 at 20:21:10 +0100, Frank Denis obsd-po...@pureftpd.org
wrote:
Le Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 06:26:24PM +0100, Toni Mueller ecrivait :
The problem: After upgrading from 4.4 and 4.5, I cannot log in to any
account on any of my FTP servers
Hi,
On Sun, 03.01.2010 at 20:59:52 +0100, Henning Brauer
lists-openbsdpo...@bsws.de wrote:
no, the 4.6 pureftpd package is NOT unusable. works just fine here,
with LDAP backend as well.
as distributed, the package has a discrepancy between the FTPStatus
field in the schema, where the comment
On Tue, 29.12.2009 at 21:01:10 +, Jacob Meuser jake...@sdf.lonestar.org
wrote:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 05:45:40PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
ok... now this does not entirely seem to work as I expect. Now, while
making the aforementioned php5-5.2.12 package, it sits there forever
Hi,
On Thu, 08.10.2009 at 08:08:59 +0200, Robert rob...@openbsd.pap.st wrote:
Scince i have not seen any roadway to include dovecot 1.2.* for
OpenBSD 4.7, it makes no sense to send a diff yet.
afaik, the freeze for 4.7 should still be two or three months away.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
Hi,
I regularly encounter the situation that I need to compile a certain
port which has dependencies. These dependencies are often non-obvious,
eg. due to the transitivity of the issue (currently I'm seeing it with
the PHP5 port). Now, when I go to the port's directory and say make
package, the
Hi,
On Sat, 31.10.2009 at 15:03:51 +, Federico G. Schwindt fg...@lodoss.net
wrote:
I'd appreciate if someone using bzr can test this update.
Thanks,
I'm using bzr, but so far have encountered a number of small(er)
problems and also not used the port, but installed directly from
Hi Stu,
On Tue, 29.12.2009 at 13:04:30 +, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
wrote:
You mean, like FETCH_PACKAGES=Yes? You can set it on the make command
line, or in /etc/mk.conf.
that would probably be it. Thanks for the cluebats!
--
Kind regards,
--Toni++
Hi,
On Tue, 29.12.2009 at 17:27:32 +0100, Toni Mueller openbsd-po...@oeko.net
wrote:
On Tue, 29.12.2009 at 13:04:30 +, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
wrote:
You mean, like FETCH_PACKAGES=Yes? You can set it on the make command
line, or in /etc/mk.conf.
that would probably
Hi,
thanks for your notes.
On Wed, 28.10.2009 at 22:13:31 +, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
wrote:
OpenBSD works reasonably well in ESXi for this sort of thing
if you really can't run -current on a real machine.
It'll be KVM or Xen over here, NO blob...
-current has Perl
On Fri, 25.04.2008 at 22:16:48 +, Miod Vallat m...@online.fr wrote:
For those who would argue that important content might get
irretrievably locked away in PDF format, I'll remind you that
Xpdf is open source, and can be modified by end users (the GPL
even allows this).
Go
Hi,
On Sun, 27.04.2008 at 11:10:49 -0700, Matthew Dempsky matt...@dempsky.org
wrote:
His use case for PDF's DRM was simply to protect students from
accidentally printing the animated slides instead of the still 4-up
slides.
yes, but this is a weak use case. I, for one, would expect students
Hi,
Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse alerted me to the fact that p5-common-sense
was already in ports, and asked for a diff. I missed it, though,
because it's only in -current.
Anyway, please find the diff below.
--
Kind regards,
--Toni++
diff -uwrN /tmp/p5-common-sense/Makefile
Hi,
On Wed, 28.10.2009 at 10:59:34 +, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
wrote:
if you're submitting new/updated ports, please run -current and keep
it fairly up-to-date so that you can check things work with what's in
the rest of the tree.
I generally understand this argument, but
Hi,
On Sat, 24.10.2009 at 21:11:06 -0400, William Yodlowsky will...@openbsd.org
wrote:
On 24 October 2009 at 19:49, Toni Mueller openbsd-po...@oeko.net wrote:
while upgrading my first box to OpenBSD 4.6, I found that CVS lists php
5.2.11 as being the latest version for 4.5, while 5.2.10
Hi,
I've created a port for Set::Crontab, which is a Perl module that
should parse crontab-style number lists and provide set operations on
them.
CPAN: http://search.cpan.org/~ams/Set-Crontab-1.02/Crontab.pm
Kind regards,
--Toni++
p5-Set-Crontab.tgz
Description: GNU Unix tar archive
Hi,
On Wed, 21.10.2009 at 11:22:42 +0100, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
wrote:
On 2009/10/21 10:43, Toni Mueller wrote:
no, I haven't got it to work, but found out that it falls over the
threading issues in OpenBSD when trying to port perlbal to OpenBSD...
If you're running
Hi,
I've created a port for common-sense, which is a shortcut to set useful
debugging options, but claims to require much less memory than the
traditional way to do it.
CPAN: http://search.cpan.org/~mlehmann/common-sense-2.01/sense.pm
Kind regards,
--Toni++
p5-common-sense.tgz
Description:
Hi,
while upgrading my first box to OpenBSD 4.6, I found that CVS lists php
5.2.11 as being the latest version for 4.5, while 5.2.10 is the latest
for 4.6. This confuses me a bit. It would be nice if someone could shed
some light on this.
TIA!
--
Kind regards,
--Toni++
Hi James,
On Tue, 21.07.2009 at 09:58:08 -0700, James Wright james2ve...@aim.com wrote:
Has anyone worked on|got working the 'AIO' library libeio which is used
in IO::AIO and AnyEvent::AIO? It compiles (both in and outside of the
IO::AIO distribution), but stalls waiting for returns (OpenbSD
Hi,
On Sat, 15.08.2009 at 20:09:14 +0200, Frank Denis obsd-t...@pureftpd.org
wrote:
Well, there's gq, too. It requires gtk+, but it's less of a monstrosity
than jxplorer.
in general, I like gq quite a bit, but it could really use some bug
fixes, and appears to be (almost?) unmaintained
On Mon, 12.10.2009 at 00:46:03 +0200, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
- pkg_add vim--no_x11 now means something. Yep, stems + flavors do work now.
Great!
--
Kind regards,
--Toni++
Hi,
please test and commit the attached port for this Perl module.
This module lets you use GnuPG to sign and/or encrypt, as well as
verify and decrypt, various kinds of messages, prominently email
messages in eg. PGP/MIME format. The module provides a decent OO-style
API to the user.
I use
Hi,
I thought I'd give puppet a spin, after reading enough comments about
how great it is. Unfortunately, the port is way behind.
Please test the attached update to ruby-facter, a prerequisite to
ruby-puppet.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
ruby-facter-1.5.6.tar.gz
Description: Binary data
Hi,
please test the attached update to ruby-puppet.
--
Kind regards,
--Toni++
ruby-puppet-0.25.0.tar.gz
Description: Binary data
Hi,
please test the attached port for this Perl module. It should be a
no-brainer.
Thank you!
Kind regards,
--Toni++
p5-Mail-GnuPG.tgz
Description: GNU Unix tar archive
Hi,
On Sat, 05.09.2009 at 13:57:00 -0700, Ryan Boggs rmbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone else tested the attached diff yet? If so, are there any changes
that need to
be made before it can be committed? Please let me know so I can make the
necessary
adjustments.
I'm just looking into
Hi,
On Mon, 07.09.2009 at 23:47:22 +0200, frantisek holop min...@obiit.org wrote:
my favourite is actually having the filename on its own line,
just double-click on it, and paste with left button after less ,
I'm unaware of a terminal program that would allow to paste with the
*left* mouse
Hi,
I learnt that I can say pkg_add -ui to get the latest of everything
in my already-installed packages (right?). But I have to install a
certain package first, and that's where the question begins:
I'd like to be able to eg. say pkg_add vim_no-x11 and let the package
system figure out which
Hi Nikolaj,
On Thu, 10.09.2009 at 15:08:36 +0100, Mikolaj Kucharski
miko...@kucharski.name wrote:
Not sure will that help you, but try addapt attached port for your
needs. I'm using this approach for months.
this is a neat idea and easy to implement.
I only don't see how to select specific
On Thu, 10.09.2009 at 17:46:55 +0200, Toni Mueller openbsd-po...@oeko.net
wrote:
I only don't see how to select specific flavors this way. But maybe
I'll see it later, after re-reading the various ports related man
pages.
I have to swallow my words. Stuart's hint does exactly that, emit all
Hi,
On Mon, 20.07.2009 at 17:11:31 +0100, Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org
wrote:
On 2009/07/20 17:38, Jonathan Armani wrote:
Just a note for php users, php segfault on my server since I update
it to 2.5.10 :
[Mon Jul 20 17:28:03 2009] [notice] child pid 31165 exit signal
Hi,
On Thu, 09.07.2009 at 22:16:58 +0200, Henning Brauer
lists-openbsdpo...@bsws.de wrote:
* Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org [2009-07-09 21:14]:
Me too, but if something pulls in 2.3 as a BUILD or LIB depend, and
something else pulls in 2.4
is this really going to happen?
I don't
-(
On Mon, 16.02.2009 at 11:16:13 +0100, Toni Mueller openbsd-po...@oeko.net
wrote:
On Sun, 15.02.2009 at 15:28:00 +0100, Toni Mueller openbsd-po...@oeko.net
wrote:
On Fri, 06.02.2009 at 12:21:06 +0100, Toni Mueller openbsd-po...@oeko.net
wrote:
I have openldap-server-2.3.43, as shipped
Hi,
On Wed, 14.05.2008 at 04:05:28 +0200, Henning Brauer
lists-openbsdpo...@bsws.de wrote:
and makes a regular update a no-no in my eyes. I have been using
ldbm everywhere all the time, because that was the only stable backend
for years. I suspect I amnot quite alone (read:many many many
Hi,
On Thu, 09.07.2009 at 11:25:07 +0100, Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org
wrote:
so; some developers need 2.3. other people need 2.4. others don't
nice distinction. ;-}
I have to correct myself, however, in that syncrepl synchronization
does appear to (partially) work. With bdb, I was
Hi,
On Tue, 30.06.2009 at 14:17:51 +0200, Toni Mueller openbsd-po...@oeko.net
wrote:
I've seen that this option isn't part of the port, but, not being a PHP
guru, don't know why. I also don't know how to test for this option in
a given PHP binary. :(
I don't know whether this option has
Hi,
I had to create a port for Perl's FCGI module. I need the module to run
MovableType together with MT-Dispatch. Please review the attached port
to see whether it is ok for you, and send me your feedback.
TIA!
--
Kind regards,
--Toni++
p5-FCGI.tar.gz
Description: Binary data
Hi,
I'm having a problem with pure-ftpd-ldap on amd64.
Short story: When trying to authenticate, the child crashes.
Slightly longer story:
I've had the same setup running for years on 32bit machines. The setup
comprises OpenLDAP + TLS and pure-ftpd-ldap + TLS, authenticating
against an
Hi Claudio,
On Sun, 14.06.2009 at 18:21:21 +0200, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com
wrote:
Update the port to -current or define LDAP_DEPRECATED in src/log_ldap_p.h
You can send your regards including all rants to the openldap mailing list
and their braindead model of deprecating the
Hi,
On Sun, 14.06.2009 at 18:43:50 +0200, Toni Mueller openbsd-po...@oeko.net
wrote:
In the meantime, I've updated the port to pure-ftpd-1.0.22 as per your
suggestions, but with not much success. Now I get Login failed in the
client, and in the OpenLDAP log, I get tons of
requesting
Hi,
I've just discovered that I had some old packages from 4.4 installed on
a 4.5 system. While investigating the resulting breakage, it occurred
to me that I don't seem to have an easy way to properly determine which
ports are being made obsolete by new functionality in the base system.
In
Hi,
On Tue, 26.05.2009 at 10:20:20 +0200, Robert rob...@openbsd.pap.st wrote:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade45.html#Pkgup
AAARRGG
Thanks!
Kind regards,
--Toni++
Hi,
On Tue, 26.05.2009 at 11:20:35 +0200, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
This is a known defect. It will be dealt with eventually, hopefully soon...
thanks to Stuart and you for the background information.
I aimed at both targets when I posed the question.
--
Kind regards,
--Toni++
Hi,
On Tue, 05.05.2009 at 19:57:22 +0100, Federico G. Schwindt fg...@lodoss.net
wrote:
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 01:08:22AM +0100, Federico G. Schwindt wrote:
- Create /var/varnish by default
- Use _varnish. Nothing should use nobody, not even by default
- Use kqueue
- Use -pthread
Hi,
On Fri, 15.05.2009 at 17:38:10 +0100, Federico G. Schwindt fg...@lodoss.net
wrote:
no worries. can you try disabling kqueue to see if that's the issue?
i have been busy as well, so i haven't commited it yet. i will do during
the weekend.
I'm not sure that I'll manage to do this that
Hi,
after Jim and others did the bulk of the work, I'll try to take over.
In any case, a port of 2.0.4 is attached. This is what the changelog
has to say:
snip
Varnish 2.0.4 has just been released. This release contains multiple
changes, amongst them:
* Serve graced objects
Hi,
On Sun, 04.01.2009 at 02:14:52 +0100, Matthias Kilian k...@outback.escape.de
wrote:
Thanks. I already got some explanations from jasper@ about this
strange MODPY_EGG_VERSION thing ;-)
any chance to make it public?
I'd like to package virtualenv, which I need, but currently get stuck
in
Hi,
On Tue, 10.02.2009 at 20:55:08 -0500, b...@openbsd.rutgers.edu
b...@openbsd.rutgers.edu wrote:
Yeah. We can try sending a diff upstream to get them to use safe string
functions, but otherwise... they will probably stay as is.
doing that seems to be a good idea.
I think it should
Hi Jim,
On Mon, 02.03.2009 at 08:24:52 -0500, Jim Razmus j...@bonetruck.org wrote:
Again I throw varnish maintainer up in the air. My employer has decided
to go with Apache2 mod_cache. I don't have a personal need for varnish
either.
Anyone want it?
yes, me, but I'd need some help.
--
Hi Jim,
On Mon, 02.03.2009 at 08:20:34 -0500, Jim Razmus j...@bonetruck.org wrote:
* Toni Mueller openbsd-po...@oeko.net [090302 06:51]:
# /usr/local/sbin/varnishd -d -f /etc/varnish/test.vcl -g www -n proxy_1 -P
/var/run/varnish/proxy_1.pid -u www -s file,/var/varnish/proxy_1_data,100m
Hi,
I've discovered that, if I start out installing systems small (eg.
w/o packages, and w/o xbase), ld doesn't know where to find a lot of
the required libraries. When I install a package, I usually want to run
the associated software without further tweaking, but before I can do
so, I have to
Hi,
On Sun, 01.02.2009 at 18:08:37 +0100, Simon Bertrang ja...@errornet.de wrote:
- add missing RUN_DEPENDS to p5-BSD-Resource and p5-libwww
The only thing that i still see and i'm not very tempted to fix is a
failing test. Upstream also doesn't seem very active... but anyway,
at least
Hi,
On Thu, 19.02.2009 at 18:18:43 +0100, Toni Mueller openbsd-po...@oeko.net
wrote:
[ a lot of mostly useless stuff because I overlooked naddy's
tree locked message ]
I'd roll the port nonetheless, if desired.
--
Kind regards,
--Toni++
Hi,
On Sun, 15.02.2009 at 15:28:00 +0100, Toni Mueller openbsd-po...@oeko.net
wrote:
On Fri, 06.02.2009 at 12:21:06 +0100, Toni Mueller openbsd-po...@oeko.net
wrote:
I have openldap-server-2.3.43, as shipped with OpenBSD 4.4/i386, under
I have this package also running on 4.4/amd64
Hi,
On Fri, 06.02.2009 at 12:21:06 +0100, Toni Mueller openbsd-po...@oeko.net
wrote:
I have openldap-server-2.3.43, as shipped with OpenBSD 4.4/i386, under
I have this package also running on 4.4/amd64, and it hung on an
attempt to add an entry. I needed to use kill -9 in order to restart
Hi,
I have openldap-server-2.3.43, as shipped with OpenBSD 4.4/i386, under
'runit' in a slave configuration for replication via syncrepl from a
master server, which is openldap-server-2.3.33p1-bdb. The servers are
mostly idle, processing between 0 and perhaps 2 requests per second,
but mostly 0
Hi Simon,
On Sun, 01.02.2009 at 18:08:37 +0100, Simon Bertrang ja...@errornet.de wrote:
Attached is an updated version. Specifically i changed:
so much that I have to question my qualification for maintaining the
port.
What do you think?
Kind regards,
--Toni++
Hi,
On Mon, 26.01.2009 at 15:10:56 +0100, Toni Mueller openbsd-po...@oeko.net
wrote:
Thanks! I'll probably first talk to the guy about it, as others
suggested, though.
I've got this response:
There is nothing to uphold. It is a request with no force. It's
also no longer relevant.
So
Hi,
On Sat, 24.01.2009 at 19:53:07 +0100, Simon Bertrang ja...@errornet.de wrote:
Just set CPAN_AUTHOR to the authors id. Look at cpan.port.mk or grep
through other Perl ports also using this variable.
ok, thank you. This is mentioned nowhere, however, and it's a lot less
automatic than a
Hi,
On Fri, 23.01.2009 at 11:19:28 +0100, Toni Mueller openbsd-po...@oeko.net
wrote:
I've now created a preliminary port for perlbal, and one for
I've attached a revised version of the port of perlbal, a fast reverse
proxy and web server, written in Perl.
You need the non-official p5-Net
Hi,
On Mon, 26.01.2009 at 12:37:14 +, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
wrote:
On 2009/01/26 12:10, Toni Mueller wrote:
On Sat, 24.01.2009 at 19:53:07 +0100, Simon Bertrang ja...@errornet.de
wrote:
Just set CPAN_AUTHOR to the authors id. Look at cpan.port.mk or grep
through
Hi,
On Mon, 26.01.2009 at 22:58:41 +0100, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 12:10:49PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
ok, thank you. This is mentioned nowhere, however, and it's a lot less
automatic than a CPAN-based download could be.
But it does have other
Hi,
while still wrestling with the perlbal port, I've found that there is
no way to download this package from CPAN with 'make fetch' because
this results in attempts to fetch .../by-module/... . After nagging
quite a lot of people, Andreas J. Koenig from mind.de finally answered
an email of
Hi,
On Fri, 23.01.2009 at 09:15:46 +0100, Giovanni Bechis giova...@openbsd.org
wrote:
Toni Mueller wrote:
I'm not enough of a C guru, or at least not enough at leisure atm, to
dig into this problem, and would greatly appreciate help!
I think that our perl() is not thread-safe,
(see /usr
Hi,
I've now created a preliminary port for perlbal, and one for
p5-Net-Netmask, which is so far required to provide some features for
perlbal, like access control based on IP addresses. After doing this,
it looks like only one set of tests (the admin interface) fails,
because I can't reasonably
Hi,
I'm in the process of creating a port for perlbal from Danga, and
noticed that the self-tests don't all run to completion. This is
partially due to not having IO::AIO. So I thought, why not create a
port for IO::AIO, too, but while creating the port's mechanics was
quite easy, it looks like
Hi Jim,
thanks for posting.
On Sat, 17.01.2009 at 23:06:38 -0500, Jim Razmus j...@bonetruck.org wrote:
I dropped the maintainer line from the Makefile. I've gone with Movable
Type and don't need or want an HTTP accelerator anymore.
This caught my curiosity. What were you using Varnish for,
Hi,
I've packaged Danga::Socket, which is helps creating high-performance
servers. This module is needed for perlbal, which I'm about to create a
port for, too.
Please test and send feedback.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
p5-Danga-Socket.tgz
Description: GNU Unix tar archive
Hi Jim,
thanks for answering.
On Sun, 18.01.2009 at 12:30:41 -0500, Jim Razmus j...@bonetruck.org wrote:
Varnish is a reverse caching HTTP proxy more or less. It allocates a
chunk memory and then caches the output from backend web servers to
serve future requests itself. It's like squid,
Hi,
On Sun, 18.01.2009 at 18:59:19 +0100, Toni Mueller openbsd-po...@oeko.net
wrote:
Please test and send feedback.
I was a bit rash. There are probably some patches missing. =8-|
--
Kind regards,
--Toni++
Hi,
sorry about the blunder, but initially, I forgot a dependency.
The new port is attached...
--
Kind regards,
--Toni++
p5-Danga-Socket.tgz
Description: GNU Unix tar archive
Hi,
I've packaged Sys::Syscall which exposes some more system calls to Perl
programs than are available through stock Perl. This port is required
by Danga::Socket.
Please test and send feedback.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
p5-Sys-Syscall.tgz
Description: GNU Unix tar archive
Hi,
On Mon, 10.11.2008 at 11:59:50 -0500, Jim Razmus j...@bonetruck.org wrote:
This really needs testing on different archs before commit. My sun
servers are toast. Only tested on i386.
Port available here: http://www.bonetruck.org/tmp/varnish.tgz
I can't find this tarball, and neither a
Hi,
On Tue, 09.09.2008 at 15:18:46 +0200, Landry Breuil gas...@gcu.info wrote:
I had a quick look to your port only ports-wise, but why not adding
something like LDFLAGS=-pthread instead of patching Makefile.am and re-running
it built fine here without patches and with
Hi,
On Sat, 27.12.2008 at 10:39:10 +1100, Damien Miller d...@mindrot.org wrote:
This (large) diff updates and garbage collects all three Python
ports:
2.4.4 = 2.4.8
2.5.2 = 2.5.4
2.6 = 2.6.1
stupid question, perhaps, but would it be a good idea to hack at P3.0?
Or do you think
Hi,
On Sat, 03.01.2009 at 20:51:40 +0300, Kirill S. Bychkov ya...@linklevel.net
wrote:
This is a resubmit of apcupsd port.
Any comments/oks?
I have no comment on the port, just a question: What would be the
advantage of using apcupsd in favour of nut?
Kind regards,
--Toni++
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
