Todd T. Fries wrote:
What I sent was based on your 1.1.x port, that is where I started at
c2k5. I got far enough to realize we needed a rather dated mozilla
devel laying around for it to build and opted for the more recent
openoffice.
The first question someone working on the port will
Hi,
This url is now dead, is there not a port of OO maintained anymore?
Why is it that we must use linux emulation? FreeBSD have managed to build
a native port I believe.
Thanks
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 03:00:25AM +0100, Rembrandt wrote:
Is there somebody wich is working on an
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 05:30:03 -0500 (CDT)
Edd Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This url is now dead, is there not a port of OO maintained anymore?
It would appear not.
Why is it that we must use linux emulation?
Because OO is inherently a behemoth to port and apparently noone
with the skills
On Jun 22, 2005, at 7:00 AM, Todd T. Fries wrote:
[snip]
Oh, um, once you d/l the src, you need to s/^M//g on all the
Makefile's. It took me a few hours to realize the special make
program distributed with openoffice bombs out on OpenBSD with them
there. Obviously this would need to be
What I sent was based on your 1.1.x port, that is where I started at
c2k5. I got far enough to realize we needed a rather dated mozilla
devel laying around for it to build and opted for the more recent
openoffice.
The first question someone working on the port will want to know is, how
did
